Molecular Vision 2011; 17:1222-1230 <>
Received 26 September 2010 | Accepted 1 May 2011 | Published 6 May 2011

Transcriptional factors associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition in choroidal neovascularization

Manabu Hirasawa,1,2 Kousuke Noda,1,3 Setsuko Noda,4 Misa Suzuki,1,5 Yoko Ozawa,1,2 Kei Shinoda,6 Makoto Inoue,7 Yoko Ogawa,2 Kazuo Tsubota,2 Susumu Ishida1,2,3

1Laboratory of Retinal Cell Biology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan; 4Department of Nursing, Tokai University School of Health Sciences, Isehara, Japan; 5Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan; 6Department of Ophthalmology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 7Kyorin Eye Center, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to: Kousuke Noda, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Ophthalmology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, N-15, W-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan; Phone: +81-11-706-5944; FAX: +81-11-706-5948; email:


Purpose: To investigate the transcriptional factors associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: Paraffin sections of CNV obtained from patients with AMD (n=12) were stained for transcriptional factors related to EMT, i.e., Snail, Slug, SIP1, and Twist. As a control, postmortem sections of ocular normal tissue were used. Furthermore, using a human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell line (ARPE-19), reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) and immunofluorescence microscopy were performed to explore the cellular localization and expression levels of EMT-associated transcriptional factors upon cytokine stimulation.

Results: Of 12 specimens, 11 CNV tissues (91.6%) showed staining for Snail localized in cellular nuclei, particularly in those of RPE cells. Snail was strongly co-localized with α-smooth muscle antigen (SMA) in RPE cells. In contrast, postmortem human retina showed no Snail staining in RPE cells. Other transcriptional factors, Slug, Twist and SIP1 were not detected in CNV or normal human retina. In ARPE-19 cells, RT–PCR and immunofluorescence microscopy showed that Snail mRNA was upregulated by transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and VEGF stimulation. Furthermore, TGF-β induced relocalization of Snail to the nucleus in RPE cells.

Conclusions: The current data indicate that Snail is a major transcriptional factor for EMT changes of RPE cells in human CNV.


Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), characterized by the formation of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), is a leading cause of irreversible blindness among people over age 50 in the western world [1]. So far, the mechanisms of CNV formation have been well analyzed, and lines of evidence have revealed that angiogenesis, inflammation, and oxidative stress are the underlying causes [1-7]. The accumulated data have led to the development of several therapeutic strategies for AMD, such as verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) [8], anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy [9], and combined therapy [10,11]. By contrast, little is known regarding the molecular mechanism(s) of tissue scar formation in CNV. Since fibrotic changes in the foveal CNV lesion result in permanent visual impairment in patients with wet AMD [12], the mechanisms of tissue fibrosis in the late stage of AMD are of great interest.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a role in physiologic and pathological conditions, for instance, in embryogenesis, tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, and tissue fibrosis [13]. During EMT, epithelial cells lose their characteristics and acquire the properties of mesenchymal cells. Upon tissue repair-associated events and tissue fibrosis, EMT is known to be triggered by inflammatory cytokines, cytotoxic stress, and DNA damage [13]. Similarly, upon CNV formation retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells have been shown to lose their junctional integrity [14] and convert morphologically to fibroblastic-shaped cells [15,16]. These facts led us to the hypothesis that EMT of RPE cells is involved in the fibrotic scar formation in AMD. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that EMT is crucial in the formation of matrix deposition and tissue fibrosis in ocular tissues [17,18]. Furthermore, inflammatory or angiogenesis-related cytokines, such as VEGF, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), tumor-necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and transforming growth factor (TGF)−β, which are known to trigger EMT changes, are found in CNV tissues [5,15,19-21]. However, whether and to what extent EMT occurs during the tissue fibrosis of CNV tissue remains unclear.

An important group of transcriptional factors inducing EMT is the Snail family, including Snail (Snail1) and Slug (Snail2), zinc finger proteins that regulate changes in gene-expression patterns. The Snail family suppresses the expression of epithelial molecules like E-Cadherin and zonular occludens (ZO)-1 by binding to the DNA promoter region and stimulating mesenchymal changes, cell mobility, and proliferation in a variety of epithelial cells [22-24]. Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that upregulation of Snail family expression is observed in various tumors originating from epithelial cells [25-28] and in renal fibrosis [29,30], indicating the pivotal role of Snail during EMT. SIP1 (Smad interacting protein 1) is also a zinc finger protein, postulated as an invasion promoter suppressing epithelial adhesion molecule transcription [31]. Snail and SIP1 bind to overlapping promoter sequences and show similar silencing effects [32]. Another molecule known to trigger EMT mechanisms is Twist, a transcription factor containing a helix–loop–helix DNA-binding domain that regulates the Cadherin gene family [33].

The aim of this study is to explore the expression of EMT-associated transcriptional factor(s) in CNV and to determine whether cytokines found in human CNV tissues upregulate the transcription factor(s) for EMT in RPE cells.



CNV tissues were collected from 12 eyes of 12 patients with AMD (1 eye per patient; 8 males and 4 females, mean age, 67.3±5.2 years old), who underwent pals plana vitrectomy to remove the subfoveal CNV at the Keio University Hospital from 2000 to 2001. The CNV tissues were fixed in 4% PFA immediately after the excision and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections were prepared on glass slides for immunohistochemical staining. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for clinical characteristics, which are summarized in Table 1. No PDT or intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agent had been administered in any of the cases before the surgical intervention. The current study was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained before the surgery. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of the Keio University School of Medicine (Tokyo, Japan).

As a control, two postmortem sections of ocular tissues with no retinal diseases (1 section per male from 60- and 62-year-old Caucasian males), obtained from Northwest Lions Eye Bank (Seattle, WA), were used. In addition, normal retinal tissues were obtained from 40-week-old C57Bl/6 mice (n=3; CLEA, Tokyo, Japan), after the animals were sacrificed with an overdose of anesthesia (Ketamine and Xylazine). The animal experiment was conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Cell culture

The human RPE cell line ARPE-19 was cultured in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and Nutrient Mixture F-12 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD), 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin on a 35 mm or 60 mm dish (Falcon, Los Angeles, CA). Culture medium was replaced 3 times a week. Cells were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

Immunohistochemistry and morphometric analysis

Serial paraffin sections were de-paraffinised and rehydrated with a graded series of ethanol. The sections (n=3) were treated for antigen retrieval by pressure boiling in citrate buffer (0.01M, pH 6.0) for 4 min at 121 °C, washed with 0.1% Triton-X, and blocked with 10% normal goat serum (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Subsequently, the sections were reacted with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight: RPE65 (specific marker for RPE: Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) at a dilution of 1:100, α-smooth muscle actin (SMA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at a dilution of 1:500, Snail (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at a dilution of 1:100, Slug (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:250, Twist (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:650, and SIP1 (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:200. After washing, the sections were incubated with Alexa 488 or Alexa 546 conjugated goat anti-rabbit or mouse IgG (Invitrogen) diluted 1:200 in PBS for fluorescent signal detection. The nuclei of cells were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma). All antibody concentrations were determined individually by appropriate positive controls. Primary antibodies of the same isotype (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) were used as negative control. For morphometric analysis, serial sections (n=3) of CNV were stained by hematoxylin and eosin, and the degree of staining for EMT-associated transcriptional factors and tissue fibrosis was evaluated based on a 4 grade scale: - (negative), + (10% to 40%), ++ (40% to 70%), or +++ (70% to 100%).

ARPE-19 cells were cultured and then were treated with recombinant human TGF-β (10 ng/ml; R&D systems Minneapolis, MN) or VEGF (10 ng/ml; R&D systems) for 8 h. Cells were then fixed with cold methanol/acetone (1:1) for 5 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 20 min and were blocked with 10% normal goat serum (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for 20 min. Cells were incubated with the following primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight: Snail (goat anti-rabbit; Abcam) and N-cadherin (BD Transduction Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Cells were then treated with the Alexa 546-conjugated secondary antibody (goat-anti mouse or rabbit, 1:200; Invitrogen) for 60 min. The nuclei of cells were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma).

Reverse transcription PCR

ARPE-19 cells were cultured in serum free medium for 24 h and then exposed to TGF-β (10 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), VEGF (10 ng/ml), CTGF (10 ng/ml; Cell Science, Canton, MA), bFGF (10 ng/ml; Invitrogen), and IGF-1 (10 ng/ml; R&D systems) for 4 h at 37 °C. Total RNA was extracted from ARPE-19 cells by the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcription (RT) was performed using the First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR products were obtained after 30 cycles of amplification with an annealing temperature of 55 °C using a platinum PCR supermix (Invitrogen). PCR primers were as follows: 5′-AAT CGG AAG CCT AAC TAC AG −3′ (forward), 5′- GGA AGA GGC TGA AGT AGA G −3′ (reverse) for Snail [34]; 5′- GAA GAG CTA CGA GCT GCC-3′ (forward), and 5′- TGA TCC ACA TCT GCT GGA-3′ (reverse) for β-actin [35]. PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Quantification of band density was performed using NIH Image 1.41 software (developed by Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The experiments were performed in duplicate and independently repeated 3 times.

Statistical analyses

All results were expressed as mean±SEM with n-numbers as indicated. Student’s t test was used for statistical comparison between the groups. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.


Transcriptional factors for EMT in human CNV tissues

To determine whether transcriptional factors for EMT are expressed in retinal tissue under normal conditions, we first stained normal human and mouse retina with antibodies against EMT-associated transcriptional factors. Snail was not detected in the RPE layer of normal retina (Figure 1). Similarly, the other transcriptional factors for EMT, Slug, Twist, and SIP1 were also undetectable in the RPE layer of normal retina (data not shown).

Next we stained for these same factors in surgically excised CNV tissues, tissues composed of blood vessels, stromal cells, and pigmented cells in a fibrous interstitium. The pigmented cells are stained with RPE65, indicating that the cells originated from RPE cells (Figure 2A,B). In CNV tissues, Snail was predominantly detected in the nuclei of the pigmented cells (Figure 2C,D), but it was also found in the nuclei of fibroblast-shaped cells and vascular endothelial cells. Signals for Slug, Twist, and SIP1 were undetectable in the cell nuclei of the CNV tissues (data not shown).

Immunostaining for Snail in the nuclei of RPE65-positive cells was found in 11 of 12 CNV specimens (91.6%, Figure 2 and Table 2). Morphometric analysis showed that CNV tissues with Snail-positive RPE cells (++ or +++) are associated with higher fibrotic changes (++ or +++) in comparison with those containing less Snail-positive RPE cells (Table 2), indicating a relationship between Snail expression and tissue fibrosis in RPE cells. On the cellular level, Snail–positive RPE cells (++ or +++) co-expressed α-SMA (Figure 3, Table 2).

Snail expression in cultured human RPE cells

To explore the cytokines that induce transcription of Snail in RPE cells, we stimulated ARPE-19 cells with candidate cytokines and examined the levels of Snail mRNA. First, to determine whether RPE cells constitutively express Snail, we stained ARPE-19 cells with the antibody against Snail. At 2 days after passage, Snail was strongly stained in both the cell nuclei and cytoplasm of cultured RPE cells (Figure 4A). By contrast, after cell-cell contact was established at 7 days after passage, the signal intensity for Snail was reduced in the nuclei and showed faint staining in the cytoplasm compared to those at 2 days after passage (Figure 4B), suggesting that production and cellular localization of Snail in RPE cells is related to the cell density and/or maturation of cell-cell contact.

Next, at 7 days after passage we stimulated ARPE-19 cells with cytokines, TGF-β, TNF-α, VEGF, CTGF, bFGF, and IGF-1, previously found in human CNV samples. Among them, TGF-β and VEGF significantly upregulated Snail mRNA (Figure 5AB). However, the mRNA level of Snail was not changed with stimulation of the other cytokines. Furthermore, fluorescence microscopy depicted the enhanced staining of Snail in the nucleus and cytoplasm of ARPE-19 cells stimulated with TGF-β at 7 days after passage (Figure 5C), indicating a role for TGF-β in the upregulation and nuclear relocalization of Snail in RPE cells. By contrast, VEGF enhanced immunoreactivity of Snail mainly in the cytoplasm, but not in the nucleus (Figure 5C).

Snail and N-cadherin in cultured human RPE cells

To study the relationship between Snail and adherence junctions in epithelial integrity, we stained ARPE-19 cells with antibodies against Snail and N-cadherin before and after establishment of cell-cell contact and with or without TGF-β stimulation. The major cadherin expressed by RPE cells in culture is N-cadherin [36], making N-cadherin a good marker for adherence junction formation in RPE cells.

At 2 days after passage, ARPE-19 showed an increase in Snail expression and a disrupted N-cadherin network (Figure 6A). However, once the cells established the cell-cell contact, N-cadherin expression was markedly upregulated and Snail expression decreased (Figure 6B). Furthermore, TGF-β stimulation caused upregulation of Snail expression and disruption of N-cadherin expression after establishment of cell-cell contact (Figure 6C,D).


In the present study, we investigate the expression and localization of EMT-associated transcriptional factors in surgically excised CNV tissues and cultured human RPE cells. The current data indicate that RPE cells migrating into CNV tissues undergo EMT changes mediated by the transcriptional factor, Snail. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the localization of Snail in CNV tissues, a hallmark of wet AMD.

During EMT, epithelial cells lose their polarity and cellular junctions and gain mesenchymal, fibroblast-like morphology and properties [13]. The cellular process is regulated by EMT-associated transcriptional factors such as Snail, Slug, Twist, and SIP1 via suppression of genes encoding adhesion molecules [23]. It has been shown in human tissues that epithelial-derived carcinoma cells and trans-differentiated epithelial cells during tissue fibrosis, both of which have a fibroblast-like morphology, express transcriptional factors relevant to EMT [37,38]. Recently, it has been proposed that EMT can be classified into 3 subtypes, type 1–3 EMTs, based on the biologic context [39]. In brief, type 1 EMTs are associated with implantation and embryo formation. Type 2 EMTs are associated with wound healing, tissue regeneration, and organ fibrosis. The type 2 EMTs begin as part of a repair-associated event that normally generates fibroblasts and other related cells. Type 3 EMTs occur in neoplastic cells that have previously undergone genetic and epigenetic changes. In ocular tissues, the type 2 EMT had been reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) [40,41]. Similar to the proliferative fibrous tissues formed in PVR, CNV tissues contain fibroblasts or cellular constituents with fibroblast-like morphology. In the current study, 92% of the excised CNV tissues showed Snail localization in migrated RPE cells, whereas Slug, Twist, and SIP1 were not detected. By contrast, none of the EMT-associated transcriptional factors was found in normal retinal tissues. Therefore, the current data indicate that Snail is the predominant transcriptional factor mediating EMT (type 2 EMTs) of RPE cells and is induced under the pathological condition of CNV.

Our data show that Snail expression correlates with α-SMA, an established marker for myofibroblasts, and with the amount of tissue fibrosis in CNV tissues. Previously it was reported that choroidal fibroblasts originating from mesenchymal perivascular supporting cells contributed to tissue fibrosis in CNV [42]. In addition to the fibroblasts, the current immunofluorescence study demonstrates that flattened RPE65-positive cells with a fibroblast-like phenotype also express α-SMA with nuclear localization of Snail. CNV tissues in which RPE cells showed higher nuclear localization of Snail positively correlated with the fibrosis score. Furthermore, the in vitro study showed that cultured RPE cells strongly expressed Snail with disrupted N-cadherin formation before establishing the cell-cell contact, indicating the relevance of Snail to N-cadherin formation in RPE cells. Thus, the current data suggest that the fibroblast-like cells originating, at least in part, from RPE cells undergo type 2 EMTs via the transcriptional factor Snail and contribute to the fibrotic response in the scaring of CNV in concert with fibroblasts [42].

It has been shown that EMT is triggered by cytokine signaling, for instance, TGF-β, VEGF [43], and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [44], which initiate a transcriptional dedifferentiation program correlating with morphological and functional changes [45]. Alternatively, it has also been documented that RPE are transdifferentiated to a mesenchymal phenotype by cytokines, e.g., TGF-β [41] and TNF-α [44]. In accord with previous reports using other cell lines [46,47], the current data demonstrate that Snail expression was upregulated by stimulation of TGF-β and VEGF in cultured human RPE cells. Furthermore, our immunostaining data demonstrate that TGF-β induced nuclear relocalization of Snail and disrupted N-cadherin formation in cultured RPE cells. Since cellular constituents in CNV tissues have been reported to express TGF-β and VEGF [21], the current data suggest that these inflammatory cytokines may induce Snail expression in RPE cells and play a role in the tissue fibrosis of CNV.

In summary, we showed the presence of Snail in human CNV tissues and the role of VEGF and TGF-β in the upregulation and relocalization of Snail in human RPE cells. The data indicate that Snail is a major transcriptional factor for EMT of RPE cells and is involved in the mechanism of scar formation of CNV at the late stage of AMD.


This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (05–045–0337) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, which provided generous funds for laboratory equipment used in this project. We would like to thank Haruna Koizumi and Ichie Kawamori for their support.


  1. Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2606-17. [PMID: 18550876]
  2. Donoso LA, Kim D, Frost A, Callahan A, Hageman G. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006; 51:137-52. [PMID: 16500214]
  3. Green WR. Histopathology of age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 1999; 5:27 [PMID: 10562651]
  4. Grossniklaus HE, Ling JX, Wallace TM, Dithmar S, Lawson DH, Cohen C, Elner VM, Elner SG, Sternberg P, Jr. Macrophage and retinal pigment epithelium expression of angiogenic cytokines in choroidal neovascularization. Mol Vis. 2002; 8:119-26. [PMID: 11979237]
  5. Schlingemann RO. Role of growth factors and the wound healing response in age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 242:91-101. [PMID: 14685874]
  6. Winkler BS, Boulton ME, Gottsch JD, Sternberg P. Oxidative damage and age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 1999; 5:32 [PMID: 10562656]
  7. Zarbin MA. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:598-614. [PMID: 15078679]
  8. Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L, Henshaw K. Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; 4:CD002030 [PMID: 16235294]
  9. Ip MS, Scott IU, Brown GC, Brown MM, Ho AC, Huang SS, Recchia FM. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor pharmacotherapy for age-related macular degeneration: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:1837-46. [PMID: 18929163]
  10. Kumar A, Gopalakrishnan K, Sinha S. Combination photodynamic therapy and intravitreal ranibizumab in neovascular AMD in a north Indian population: a pilot study. Retina. 2008; 28:1132-7. [PMID: 18779720]
  11. Smith BT, Dhalla MS, Shah GK, Blinder KJ, Ryan EH, , Jr Mittra RA. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2008; 28:675-81. [PMID: 18463509]
  12. Riusala A, Sarna S, Immonen I. Visual acuity and structural findings in old age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 243:947-50. [PMID: 15834599]
  13. Thiery JP, Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7:131-42. [PMID: 16493418]
  14. Bailey TA, Kanuga N, Romero IA, Greenwood J, Luthert PJ, Cheetham ME. Oxidative stress affects the junctional integrity of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:675-84. [PMID: 14744914]
  15. Lopez PF, Sippy BD, Lambert HM, Thach AB, Hinton DR. Transdifferentiated retinal pigment epithelial cells are immunoreactive for vascular endothelial growth factor in surgically excised age-related macular degeneration-related choroidal neovascular membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996; 37:855-68. [PMID: 8603870]
  16. Watanabe D, Takagi H, Suzuma K, Oh H, Ohashi H, Honda Y. Expression of connective tissue growth factor and its potential role in choroidal neovascularization. Retina. 2005; 25:911-8. [PMID: 16205572]
  17. Saika S, Kono-Saika S, Tanaka T, Yamanaka O, Ohnishi Y, Sato M, Muragaki Y, Ooshima A, Yoo J, Flanders KC, Roberts AB. Smad3 is required for dedifferentiation of retinal pigment epithelium following retinal detachment in mice. Lab Invest. 2004; 84:1245-58. [PMID: 15273699]
  18. Saika S, Yamanaka O, Flanders KC, Okada Y, Miyamoto T, Sumioka T, Shirai K, Kitano A, Miyazaki K, Tanaka S, Ikeda K. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition as a therapeutic target for prevention of ocular tissue fibrosis. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2008; 8:69-76. [PMID: 18393925]
  19. Amin R, Puklin JE, Frank RN. Growth factor localization in choroidal neovascular membranes of age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35:3178-88. [PMID: 7519180]
  20. He S, Jin ML, Worpel V, Hinton DR. A role for connective tissue growth factor in the pathogenesis of choroidal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003; 121:1283-8. [PMID: 12963611]
  21. Oh H, Takagi H, Takagi C, Suzuma K, Otani A, Ishida K, Matsumura M, Ogura Y, Honda Y. The potential angiogenic role of macrophages in the formation of choroidal neovascular membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40:1891-8. [PMID: 10440240]
  22. Barrallo-Gimeno A, Nieto MA. The Snail genes as inducers of cell movement and survival: implications in development and cancer. Development. 2005; 132:3151-61. [PMID: 15983400]
  23. Katoh M, Katoh M. Comparative genomics on SNAI1, SNAI2, and SNAI3 orthologs. Oncol Rep. 2005; 14:1083-6. [PMID: 16142376]
  24. Nieto MA, Bennett MF, Sargent MG, Wilkinson DG. Cloning and developmental expression of Sna, a murine homologue of the Drosophila snail gene. Development. 1992; 116:227-37. [PMID: 1483390]
  25. Blanco MJ, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrio D, Locascio A, Cano A, Palacios J, Nieto MA. Correlation of Snail expression with histological grade and lymph node status in breast carcinomas. Oncogene. 2002; 21:3241-6. [PMID: 12082640]
  26. Jiao W, Miyazaki K, Kitajima Y. Inverse correlation between E-cadherin and Snail expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 2002; 86:98-101. [PMID: 11857019]
  27. Rosivatz E, Becker I, Specht K, Fricke E, Luber B, Busch R, Hofler H, Becker KF. Differential expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulators snail, SIP1, and twist in gastric cancer. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161:1881-91. [PMID: 12414534]
  28. Waldmann J, Feldmann G, Slater EP, Langer P, Buchholz M, Ramaswamy A, Saeger W, Rothmund M, Fendrich V. Expression of the zinc-finger transcription factor Snail in adrenocortical carcinoma is associated with decreased survival. Br J Cancer. 2008; 99:1900-7. [PMID: 19018264]
  29. Boutet A, De Frutos CA, Maxwell PH, Mayol MJ, Romero J, Nieto MA. Snail activation disrupts tissue homeostasis and induces fibrosis in the adult kidney. EMBO J. 2006; 25:5603-13. [PMID: 17093497]
  30. Boutet A, Esteban MA, Maxwell PH, Nieto MA. Reactivation of Snail genes in renal fibrosis and carcinomas: a process of reversed embryogenesis? Cell Cycle. 2007; 6:638-42. [PMID: 17374993]
  31. Comijn J, Berx G, Vermassen P, Verschueren K, van Grunsven L, Bruyneel E, Mareel M, Huylebroeck D, van Roy F. The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion. Mol Cell. 2001; 7:1267-78. [PMID: 11430829]
  32. Burke JM. Epithelial phenotype and the RPE: is the answer blowing in the Wnt? Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008; 27:579-95. [PMID: 18775790]
  33. Oda H, Tsukita S, Takeichi M. Dynamic behavior of the cadherin-based cell-cell adhesion system during Drosophila gastrulation. Dev Biol. 1998; 203:435-50. [PMID: 9808792]
  34. Espineda CE, Chang JH, Twiss J, Rajasekaran SA, Rajasekaran AK. Repression of Na,K-ATPase beta1-subunit by the transcription factor snail in carcinoma. Mol Biol Cell. 2004; 15:1364-73. [PMID: 14699059]
  35. Liu XH, Kirschenbaum A, Lu M, Yao S, Dosoretz A, Holland JF, Levine AC. Prostaglandin E2 induces hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha stabilization and nuclear localization in a human prostate cancer cell line. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277:50081-6. [PMID: 12401798]
  36. Van Aken EH, De Wever O, Van Hoorde L, Bruyneel E, De Laey JJ, Mareel MM. Invasion of retinal pigment epithelial cells: N-cadherin, hepatocyte growth factor, and focal adhesion kinase. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44:463-72. [PMID: 12556370]
  37. Elloul S, Elstrand MB, Nesland JM, Trope CG, Kvalheim G, Goldberg I, Reich R, Davidson B. Snail, Slug, and Smad-interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 103:1631-43. [PMID: 15742334]
  38. Kojc N, Zidar N, Gale N, Poljak M, Fujs Komlos K, Cardesa A, Hofler H, Becker KF. Transcription factors Snail, Slug, Twist, and SIP1 in spindle cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Virchows Arch. 2009; 454:549-55. [PMID: 19381684]
  39. Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009; 119:1420-8. [PMID: 19487818]
  40. Grisanti S, Guidry C. Transdifferentiation of retinal pigment epithelial cells from epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36:391-405. [PMID: 7531185]
  41. Parapuram SK, Chang B, Li L, Hartung RA, Chalam KV, Nair-Menon JU, Hunt DM, Hunt RC. Differential effects of TGFbeta and vitreous on the transformation of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:5965-74. [PMID: 19578024]
  42. Kent D, Sheridan C. Choroidal neovascularization: a wound healing perspective. Mol Vis. 2003; 9:747-55. [PMID: 14735062]
  43. Gonzalez-Moreno O, Lecanda J, Green JE, Segura V, Catena R, Serrano D, Calvo A. VEGF elicits epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)-like cells via an autocrine loop. Exp Cell Res. 2010; 316:554-67. [PMID: 20006606]
  44. Takahashi E, Nagano O, Ishimoto T, Yae T, Suzuki Y, Shinoda T, Nakamura S, Niwa S, Ikeda S, Koga H, Tanihara H, Saya H. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulates transforming growth factor-beta-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transition by promoting hyaluronan-CD44-moesin interaction. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285:4060-73. [PMID: 19965872]
  45. Vetter G, Le Bechec A, Muller J, Muller A, Moes M, Yatskou M, Al Tanoury Z, Poch O, Vallar L, Friederich E. Time-resolved analysis of transcriptional events during SNAI1-triggered epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 385:485-91. [PMID: 19442650]
  46. Peinado H, Quintanilla M, Cano A. Transforming growth factor beta-1 induces snail transcription factor in epithelial cell lines: mechanisms for epithelial mesenchymal transitions. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278:21113-23. [PMID: 12665527]
  47. Wanami LS, Chen HY, Peiro S, Garcia de Herreros A, Bachelder RE. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A stimulates Snail expression in breast tumor cells: implications for tumor progression. Exp Cell Res. 2008; 314:2448-53. [PMID: 18554584]