Molecular Vision 2010; 16:1475-1486 <>
Received 29 December 2009 | Accepted 30 July 2010 | Published 4 August 2010

MicroRNA expression in human retinal pigment epithelial (ARPE-19) cells: Increased expression of microRNA-9 by N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide

R. Krishnan Kutty,1 William Samuel,1 Cynthia Jaworski,1 Todd Duncan,1 Chandrasekharam N. Nagineni,2 Nalini Raghavachari,3 Barbara Wiggert,1 T. Michael Redmond1

1Laboratory of Retinal Cell and Molecular Biology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; 2Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; 3Genomics Core Facility, Pulmonary and Vascular Medicine Branch, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence to: R. Krishnan Kutty, Laboratory of Retinal Cell and Molecular Biology, Bldg. 6, Room 112, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6 Center Dr., MSC 0608, Bethesda, MD, 20892; Phone: (301) 451-1962; FAX: (301) 402-1883; email:


Purpose: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of many cellular functions due to their ability to target mRNAs for degradation or translational inhibition. Previous studies have reported that the expression of microRNA-9 (miR-9) is regulated by retinoic acid and reactive oxygen species (ROS). We have previously shown that N-(4-hydoxyphenyl)-retinamide (4HPR), a retinoic acid derivative, induces ROS generation and apoptosis in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, known as ARPE-19 cells. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of miR-9 in ARPE-19 cells in response to 4HPR treatment, and to identify other miRNAs normally expressed in these cells.

Methods: ARPE-19 cells in culture were treated with 4HPR, the total RNA fractions were isolated, and the expression of various miRNAs and mRNAs was analyzed using real-time PCR. The miRNA expression profile of ARPE-19 cells was analyzed using microarray hybridization.

Results: Treatment of ARPE-19 cells with 4HPR resulted in apoptosis characterized by the increased expression of HMOX1 and GADD153 genes. A twofold increase in the expression of miR-9 was also observed during this response. Potential binding sites for the transcription factors encoded by CEBPA and CEBPB genes were found to be present in the putative promoter regions of all three genes encoding miR-9. 4HPR-induced miR-9 expression was associated with parallel increases in the expression of these transcription factor genes. 5-Aza-2’-deoxycytidine, a methyl transferase inhibitor, also increased the expression of miR-9 in ARPE-19 cells. Microarray hybridization analysis identified let-7b, let-7a, miR-125b, miR-24, miR-320, miR-23b, let-7e, and let-7d as the most abundant miRNAs normally expressed in ARPE-19 cells. These miRNAs are known to regulate cell growth, differentiation or development. The 4HPR treatment increased the expression of miR-16, miR-26b, miR-23a, and miR-15b in ARPE-19 cells, although these increases were modest when compared to the increase in the expression of miR-9.

Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that miR-9 is expressed in the RPE cell line ARPE-19, and its expression is increased by a retinoic acid derivative and by an inhibitor of promoter hypermethylation. Several miRNAs with inherent ability to regulate cell growth, differentiation and development are also normally expressed in ARPE-19 cells. Thus, miR-9 and other miRNAs could be important in maintaining RPE cell function.


MicroRNA (miRNA) is a class of single-stranded noncoding small (~22 nucleotides) RNA molecules known to regulate gene expression posttranscriptionally [1,2]. The miRNAs, encoded by genes localized to various chromosomes, are initially transcribed as primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs), then converted to pre-miRNAs and subsequently processed to mature miRNAs, which are essential components of the RNA-initiated silencing complex (RISC). An miRNA can function as a posttranscriptional silencer of gene expression either by destabilizing its target transcripts or by inhibiting their translation. A perfect complementarity between the miRNA and its target mRNA often results in the rapid degradation of the latter. A single miRNA can bind to the 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) of many target gene transcripts and thereby inhibit their translation. The translational repression requires only a partial complementarity between the miRNA and its target mRNAs [2]. Recent studies have identified miR-9 as one such miRNA with an important role in cell growth, differentiation, neurogenesis, immunity and oncogenesis due to its ability to target translational inhibition of many genes, including ONECUT2 (one cut homeobox 2), REST (RE1-silencing transcription factor), TLX (NR2E1, nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group E, member 1), and NFKB1 (nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells) [3-9]. The expression of miR-9 is generally suppressed in cases of cancer due to hypermethylation of the promoter regions of genes encoding it [10-13]. The expression of miR-9 is altered in brains affected by Alzheimer disease, and BACE1/beta-secretase is a target for translational inhibition by this microRNA [14,15]. Decreased expression of miR-9 is observed in presenilin-1 null mice [16]. Its expression is also reported to be regulated by retinoic acid, oxidative stress, alcohol and pro-inflammatory agents [7,9,17-19].

A normally functioning retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is indispensible for vision, and impaired function as a result of oxidative stress is thought to be a major factor responsible for the development of retinal degenerative diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration [20]. ARPE-19, a cell line derived from human RPE, has been widely used to investigate the response of RPE to oxidative stress [21-25]. A previous study from our laboratory has shown that the retinoic acid derivative N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4HPR, fenretinide) can generate oxidative stress, increase the expression of HMOX1 (heme oxygenase [decycling] 1) and GADD153 (DDIT3, DNA-damage-inducible transcript 3) genes and subsequently induce apoptosis in ARPE-19 cells [26]. We reasoned that miR-9 expression could be altered during this process since its expression is reported to be regulated by both retinoic acid and oxidative stress [9,17,18]. Therefore, we investigated the expression of miR-9 in ARPE-19 cells in response to 4HPR-induced HMOX1 and GADD153 expression and apoptosis. We then identified other miRNAs normally expressed in ARPE-19 cells using microarray analysis and determined if the expression levels of some of these miRNAs were also affected by 4HPR.


Cell culture

The ARPE-19 human RPE cell line at passage 18 was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and the experiments were performed using cells from passages 20 through 24. The cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing nutrient mixture F12, 50/50 mix (Cellgro, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids and penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml), as described previously [26]. Cells were seeded onto tissue culture plates at a density of 2×105 cells/ml in complete medium and allowed to grow at 37 °C in a humidified environment of 5% CO2 in air to reach about 80% confluence (1–2 days). The culture medium was then replaced with fresh serum-free medium containing penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) before treating the cells with various agents. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4HPR) was purchased from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA) and dissolved at a concentration of 10 mM in DMSO before being added to the cell culture medium to the required concentration. The controls received an equal volume of vehicle. Treatments were performed under subdued light and other conditions for 24 h, as reported previously [26]. The ARPE-19 cells were treated with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The compound was first dissolved in DMSO before adding it to the cell culture medium to a final concentration of 1 µM. This treatment lasted 3 days, the culture medium being replaced every 24 h with fresh medium containing the compound. Sodium meta-arsenite and menadione were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, their stock solutions were prepared in water and the cells were treated with these compounds for 24 h.

Apoptosis ELISA

Detection of apoptosis in ARPE-19 cells was performed by quantitative sandwich-enzyme-immunoassay using mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against DNA and histones (Cell Death Detection Elisa kit; Roche, Indianapolis, IN), as previously described [26]. ARPE-19 cells were grown on 24-well tissue culture plates, treated with 4HPR for 24 h, and lysed by incubating with lysis buffer (250 µl/well) for 30 min at room temperature. The cell lysates were then centrifuged at 250× g for 10 min, and 10 µl aliquots of supernatants were removed and analyzed using ELISA. The absorbance at 405 nm was measured using a Victor2 Multilabel Counter (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA).

Microarray analysis

Microarray hybridization analysis was performed using NCode miRNA Expression Profiling Services (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Total RNA was isolated from untreated ARPE-19 cells using TRIzol Reagent, and its quality analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. Small RNA was enriched from total RNA (20 μg) using the PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit. The enriched miRNA fraction (2.4 μg) was Poly(A) tailed, labeled with Alexa Fluor (NCode miRNA Labeling System) and hybridized to NCode Multi-Species miRNA Microarrays for 4 h at 62 °C. Two RNA samples were analyzed using this procedure on different microarrays containing duplicate spots of each miRNA probe. Hybridization and washing of the arrays were performed according to the standard protocol described in NCode miRNA Labeling System Manual. The arrays were scanned on a GenePix 400B Microarray Scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and images were then analyzed using the GenePix software.

Quantitative real-time RT–PCR analysis

For quantitative real-time RT–PCR analysis of various transcripts, 2 µg of total RNA extracted from ARPE-19 cells with RNeasy Protect Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). After reverse transcription, 5 µl of cDNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time PCR, which was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix and other reagents from Applied Biosystems. The manufacturer's default thermal cycling conditions were followed. Each PCR reaction (20 µl) was set up by using validated TaqMan probes (labeled with reporter dye FAM at the 5′ end) and primers specific for each gene (GADD153, HMOX1, CEBPA, CEBPB, and TGM2 with assay identification numbers Hs00358796_g1, Hs00157965_m1, Hs00269972_s1, Hs00270923_s1, and Hs00190278_m1, respectively). A human GAPDH (part number: 4352934E) gene was used as the endogenous control. Gene amplification data were analyzed using Applied Biosystems 7500 System Sequence Detection Software version 1.2.3. The results were expressed as n-fold induction in gene expression, calculated using the ΔΔCT method.

For real-time PCR analysis of miRNAs, total RNA fraction containing miRNAs was prepared from ARPE-19 cells using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RT–PCR analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System using individual TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (miR-107, miR-125b, miR-15a, miR-16, miR-193b, miR-210, let-7a, let-7c, let-7d, miR-98, miR-9, miR-34a, miR-26b, miR-24, miR-23a, miR-223, miR-15b, miR-128a, miR-204, or miR-224), TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix, No AmpErase UNG (Applied Biosystems). RNU48 was used as the endogenous control and the ΔΔCT method was employed to estimate miRNA expression.

The expression of selected miRNAs in ARPE-19 cells was verified by real-time PCR employing NCode SYBR Green miRNA qRT–PCR Kit and NCode miRNA First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). Total RNA samples (1 μg) were first treated with DNase I and then subjected to a polyadenylation reaction before first strand cDNA synthesis with SuperScript III and Universal RT Primer (Invitrogen). Each PCR reaction was performed using a forward primer specific for the tested miRNA and the Universal qPCR Primer. The miRNAs were analyzed and their forward primer sequences were determined as: let-7b, TGA GGT AGT AGG TTG TGT GGT T; miR-125b, TCC CTG AGA CCC TAA CTT GTG A; miR-24, TGG CTC AGT TCA GCA GGA ACA G; miR-23b, ATC ACA TTG CCA GGG ATT ACC; let-7e, TGA GGT AGG AGG TTG TAT AGT; miR-210, CTG TGC GTG TGA CAG CGG CTG A; miR-193B, AAC TGG CCC TCA AAG TCC CGC TTT; miR-423–3P, AGC TCG GTC TGA GGC CCC TCA G. For the analysis of statistical significance, Student’s paired t-test was used. All values have been expressed as mean±SD, n=4; p<0.05 denotes statistically significant differences. The results shown are representative of three different experiments.

Search for potential transcription factor binding sites

DNA sequences (1 kb) upstream of the genes transcribing miR-9 or other miRNAs were examined for the presence of potential transcription factor binding sites. The following Web-based software packages were used, each with default parameters: TESS - Transcription Element Search System [27] and the MatInspector program from Genomatix.


We analyzed the expression of miR-9 in ARPE-19 cells in response to 4HPR treatment. The cells were treated with varying concentrations of 4HPR for 24 h, and the miR-9 expression was measured using real-time RT–PCR. An increase in miR-9 expression was observed with increasing concentration of 4HPR (Figure 1). A ~2 fold increase in miR-9 expression was detected when the concentration of 4HPR reached 10 µM. Dimethyl sulfoxide, the vehicle used in this study to dissolve 4HPR, had no effect on the miR-9 expression by itself. ARPE-19 cells from passages 20 to 24 did not show detectable variation in miR-9 expression or its response to 4HPR treatment (data not shown). The 4HPR treatment induced apoptosis, as expected, as indicated by the generation of mono- and oligonucleosomes in the treated cells. We also analyzed the expression of two genes, HMOX1 (a marker for oxidative stress) and GADD153, since we have previously shown that their expression is highly increased during 4HPR-induced apoptosis of ARPE-19 cells [26]. The 4HPR-dependent increase in miR-9 expression paralleled increases in the expression of HMOX1and GADD153. Thus, treatment of ARPE-19 cells with 4HPR induces expression of miR-9 along with established markers of oxidative stress and apoptosis.

The miR-9 expression in ARPE-19 cells in response to 4HPR treatment was further investigated. Earlier work from our laboratory has shown that 4HPR-induced apoptosis of ARPE-19 cells is preceded by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [26]. The increase in HMOX1 expression is a consequence of oxidative stress. We examined the possibility that the observed increase in the expression of miR-9 in 4HPR-treated cells is mediated by oxidative stress, rather than by 4HPR directly. ARPE-19 cells were treated with menadione and sodium arsenite, agents known to cause oxidative stress, and the miR-9 expression and HMOX1 expression were then analyzed. Both of these agents induced HMOX1 expression as expected, but the miR-9 expression was not affected significantly (Figure 2). Thus, oxidative stress per se does not appear to mediate the effect of 4HPR on miR-9 expression.

We analyzed the putative promoter regions of three genes encoding miR-9 for regulatory elements. As shown in Figure 3, potential binding sites for CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (CEBP) transcription factors, CEBP-α and CEBP-β, are present in the 5′-flanking regions of MIR9–1, MIR9–2, and MIR9–3 genes. Thus, it is possible that these transcription factors could regulate the expression of miR-9. As shown in Figure 4, the increase in the expression of miR-9 due to 4HPR is associated with parallel increases in the expression of CEBPA and CEBPB, the genes encoding CEBP-α and CEBPB-β, respectively.

The expression of miR-9 genes could be suppressed by the hypermethylation of their promoter regions [10]. Treatment of cells with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine, a methyl transferase inhibitor, can alleviate this suppression. The expression of miR-9 in ARPE-19 cells increased approximately threefold in response to the treatment (Figure 5). TGM2, a gene known to be regulated by hypermethylation [28], was also induced as expected.

We next used microarray hybridization analysis to obtain a broad view of the microRNA species normally expressed in ARPE-19 cells. Small RNA preparation, which was enriched from total RNA isolated from untreated ARPE-19 cells, was employed for hybridization analysis on a microarray containing duplicate spots of each miRNA probe. The microarray analysis, when repeated using a second RNA sample, yielded similar results. The microarray data are provided at GEO (GSE23107). The relative expression levels of 62 miRNA (out of 366 human miRNAs tested) expressed substantially in these cells are shown in Figure 6. The most abundant miRNAs expressed in ARPE-19 cells were let-7b, let-7a, miR-125b, miR-24, miR-320, miR-23b, let-7e, and let-7d. The microarray analysis failed to detect the miR-9 expression in ARPE-19 cells. This could be due to the limited sensitivity of microarray analysis in comparison to real-time RT–PCR, where the target is detected after multiple cycles of amplification.

The microarray results were validated by analyzing the expression of selected miRNAs using real-time PCR analysis. Let-7b, miR-125b, miR-24, miR-23b, and let-7e represented the most abundant ones, while miR-210, miR-193b and miR-423 represented the less abundant ones. The amplification and dissociation plots (Figure 7) clearly indicate that all the miRNAs tested are present in the RNA preparations obtained from the ARPE-19 cells. Several miRNAs expressed in ARPE-19 cells are also reported or predicted to be neural retina-specific (Figure 8).

We analyzed the response of selected miRNAs in ARPE-19 cells to 4HPR treatment using real-time RT–PCR analysis (Figure 9). Most of the miRNAs tested were selected from microarray results shown in Figure 6 to represent both the most abundant as well as the less abundant miRNAs. The miR-98, miR-223, miR-15b, and miR-128a were included to represent the ones not detected by microarray analysis. We also tested miR-204 and miR-224 because they are reported to be expressed in mouse RPE [29,30]. Although all the tested miRNAs, including miR-204 and miR-224, were found to be expressed in ARPE-19 cells, the majority did not respond to 4HPR treatment. Increases in the expression of miR-16, miR-26b, miR-23a, and miR-15b were observed following 4HPR treatment; however, these increases were modest when compared to the approximately twofold increase observed for miR-9. The 5′-flanking regions (~1 kb) of genes generating miR-16, miR-26b, miR-23a, miR-15b, miR-223, and let-7a were analyzed for the presence of consensus binding sites for CEBP-α and CEBP-β. The genes for miR-16, miR-15b, and miR-223 as well as one of the three genes encoding let-7a were found to contain potential binding sites for these transcription factors (data not shown).


Although microRNA expression and function in the mammalian eye has been investigated [29,31-37], information about miRNA expression and function in the RPE is limited. An exception is the reported detection of miR-204 and miR-224 in mouse RPE using in situ hybridization [29,30]. Here we demonstrate that miR-9 is expressed in ARPE-19 cells, and that its expression is increased when these cells are exposed to 4HPR. The increase in miR-9 expression by 4HPR was associated with apoptosis, as indicated by mono- and oligonucleosomes formation, and with large increases in HMOX1 and GADD153 expression. The 4HPR-induced apoptosis and increases in GADD153 and HMOX1 expression in ARPE-19 cells are preceded by an increase in reactive oxygen species generation in ARPE-19 cells [26]. Taken together, these facts are consistent with a model of miR-9 activation due to reactive oxygen species generated from 4HPR treatment. Indeed, increase of miR-9 expression following oxidative stress induced by metal sulfates has been reported [18]. However, our results eliminate oxidative stress as a direct regulator of the miR-9 expression in ARPE-19 cells. Menadione and arsenite, agents well known to cause oxidative stress, failed to increase the miR-9 expression in these cells. In contrast, the expression of HMOX1, a marker for oxidative stress, was highly increased in cells treated with these agents, as expected. 4HPR is a derivative of all-trans-retinoic acid, which has been shown to be a regulator of miR-9 expression [17]. All-trans-retinoic acid is also known to regulate gene expression through its effects upon the expression of CEBP transcription factors [38,39]. Our sequence analysis indicated that putative CEBP binding sites are present on potential promoter regions of all three genes encoding miR-9 precursors (MIR9–1, MIR9–2, and MIR9–3). Our observation that the expression of genes encoding CEBP-α and CEBP-β increased in ARPE-19 cells in response to 4HPR treatment suggests that these transcription factors could be involved in the regulation of miR-9 expression. The 4HPR treatment also significantly increased the expression of miR-15b, miR-16, miR-23a, and miR-26b. However, putative binding sites for CEBP-α and CEBP-β were absent in the promoter regions of the genes encoding miR-23a and miR-26b. Thus, factors other than CEBP-α and CEBP-β are indicated in the regulation of expression of these miRNAs by 4HPR.

Expression of miR-9 is also known to be regulated by hypermethylation of the promoter regions of genes encoding this microRNA. This epigenetic repression of miR-9 expression has been reported to be a contributing factor to breast and colorectal cancer development [10-12]. Our results show that the miR-9 expression in ARPE-19 cells is regulated by this mechanism. Treatment of the ARPE-19 cells with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine to block DNA methylation resulted in increased expression of both miR-9 and TGM2, a gene known to be regulated by hypermethylation [28]. The potential role of epigenetic regulation of miR-9 or other microRNAs in RPE pathophysiology is not yet known, although it has been implicated in cancer and aging [40,41].

The ability of miR-9 to target many genes for translational repression makes it a potentially effective regulator of cell growth, differentiation, neurogenesis, immunity and cancer. There appears to be a large number of potential targets for this microRNA; 936 conserved targets of miR-9 are reported in TargetScan release 5.2. However, only a few of them have been verified experimentally. MiR-9 is reported to control the secretory response of insulin-producing cells by diminishing the expression of the ONECUT2 transcription factor, a regulator of Granuphilin expression [3]. The transcription factor REST, a silencer of neuronal gene expression, is also a target of miR-9 whose expression is downregulated in Huntington’s disease [4]. MiR-9 is reported to accelerate neural stem cell differentiation by suppressing the expression of the nuclear receptor TLX [5]. Another target for miR-9 is BACE1/beta-secretase, whose activity is elevated in brains affected by Alzheimer disease [14]. The transcription factor NF-KappaB1 is reported to be targeted by this microRNA during growth of ovarian cancer cells and in monocytes and neutrophils exposed to pro-inflammatory agents [6,7]. Several components of the Fgf signaling pathway are targeted by miR-9 during late embryonic development in zebrafish [8]. Translational repression by miR-9 is also reported for E-cadherin in the SK-Hep-1 hepatoma cell line [42], Foxg1 in developing mouse brains [43] and the BK channel splice variant in rat striatal neurons during alcohol adaptation [19]. ONECUT2 appears to be an interesting target since it has been reported that this transcription factor regulates the expression of MITF, a gene important for RPE physiology [44]. NF-KappaB1 could also be an important target during the response of RPE to pro-inflammatory agents or oxidative stress.

We demonstrated using microarray analysis that a large number of miRNAs are normally expressed in the RPE cell line, ARPE-19. RT–PCR analysis was employed to verify the expression of several miRNAs. The most abundant miRNAs that were detected in ARPE-19 cells were let-7b, let-7a, miR-125b, miR-24, miR-320, miR-23b, let-7e, and let-7d. The let-7 family of microRNAs are important regulators of differentiation and development, and their deregulation is often associated with cancer [45,46]. MiR-125b is a novel regulator of the tumor suppressor p53 [47] as well as many genes involved in neuronal differentiation [48]. MiR-24 has been shown to regulate several cell cycle genes, the activin type 1 receptor ALK4 and dihydrofolate reductase [49-51]. MiR-320 regulates cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and cell proliferation by targeting heat-shock protein 20 and transferrin receptor 1, respectively [52,53]. MiR-23b is reported to regulate cell differentiation by targeting Smad proteins [54]. The potential role of these microRNAs in regulating RPE function remains to be elucidated. It should be noted that microarray analysis did not detect miR-9 expression in ARPE-19 cells. The sensitivity of microarray analysis is highly limited when compared to real-time RT–PCR, the method we first employed to detect it.

Since ARPE-19 cells are a widely employed and useful experimental model, it is sensible to determine how well the population of miRNAs corresponds to what is observed in retinal tissue. Two groups of investigators have studied miRNA expression in mouse retinas, using both array hybridization techniques. Among the 69 miRNAs identified in this study, the 77 reported by Xu et al. [37] and 75 reported by Shen et al. [55], 30 are common to all three sets. The two studies based upon extraction of miRNA from retinal tissue have a total of 40 miRNAs in common. Interestingly, the ARPE-19 cells have a similar degree of commonality with the 2 data sets from retinas, having 43 in common with each.

The hybridization studies above have been complemented by an informatics approach. Working from a collection of retinal genes, Arora et al. [33] produced a list of miRNAs predicted to target the 3′-untranslated regions of their mRNA sequences. The authors then demonstrated the expression of a selection of the miRNAs using PCR. Several of the verified miRNAs are present in all three hybridization data sets (miR-29, miR-107, let-7d, miR-23a, and miR-143); three others (miR-124, miR-106, and miR-143) are present in at least one of the hybridization data sets. MiR-135 and miR-200, although validated, were not found in any of the hybridization data sets. However, this validation was performed using PCR, and like miR-9 in the present study, the expression of miR-135 and miR-200 may be undetectable by hybridization. Only 10 of the miRNAs found collectively in the three hybridization studies were not among those predicted. Interestingly, 5 of these (miR-184, miR-210, miR-31, miR-335, and miR-92) were deemed to be “retina specific” in expression, according to the tissue survey conducted by Xu et al. [37]. Thus, it appears that the predictive value of the informatics approach is fruitful.

In summary, we have shown that miR-9 is expressed in the RPE cell line known as ARPE-19 and that its expression increases during 4HPR-induced apoptosis. The 4HPR-induced miR-9 expression was associated with parallel increases in the expression of CEBPA and CEBPB transcription factor genes. Potential binding sites for these transcription factors were present in the putative promoter regions of all three genes encoding miR-9. The miR-9 expression in ARPE-9 cells was also increased in response to treatment with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine, a methyl transferase inhibitor, thus indicating that the gene(s) encoding this microRNA could be epigenetically regulated via hypermethylation of their promoter regions. Microarray analysis showed that a large number of miRNAs are normally expressed in ARPE-19 cells, the most abundant ones being let-7b, let-7a, miR-125b, miR-24, miR-23b, let-7e, and let-7d. The miR-9 and other microRNAs could play an important role in maintaining RPE cell function.


This study was supported by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Eye Institute and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Note: While this manuscript was under review, Wang et al. [56] reported on the expression of miRNAs in fetal human RPE and the possible role of miR-204 and miR-211 in regulating epithelial physiology.


  1. Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004; 431:350-5. [PMID: 15372042]
  2. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004; 116:281-97. [PMID: 14744438]
  3. Plaisance V, Abderrahmani A, Perret-Menoud V, Jacquemin P, Lemaigre F, Regazzi R. MicroRNA-9 controls the expression of Granuphilin/Slp4 and the secretory response of insulin-producing cells. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281:26932-42. [PMID: 16831872]
  4. Packer AN, Xing Y, Harper SQ, Jones L, Davidson BL. The bifunctional microRNA miR-9/miR-9* regulates REST and CoREST and is downregulated in Huntington's disease. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:14341-6. [PMID: 19118166]
  5. Zhao C, Sun G, Li S, Shi Y. A feedback regulatory loop involving microRNA-9 and nuclear receptor TLX in neural stem cell fate determination. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009; 16:365-71. [PMID: 19330006]
  6. Guo LM, Pu Y, Han Z, Liu T, Li YX, Liu M, Li X, Tang H. MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1. FEBS J. 2009; 276:5537-46. [PMID: 19702828]
  7. Bazzoni F, Rossato M, Fabbri M, Gaudiosi D, Mirolo M, Mori L, Tamassia N, Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Locati M. Induction and regulatory function of miR-9 in human monocytes and neutrophils exposed to proinflammatory signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106:5282-7. [PMID: 19289835]
  8. Leucht C, Stigloher C, Wizenmann A, Klafke R, Folchert A, Bally-Cuif L. MicroRNA-9 directs late organizer activity of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11:641-8. [PMID: 18454145]
  9. Sempere LF, Freemantle S, Pitha-Rowe I, Moss E, Dmitrovsky E, Ambros V. Expression profiling of mammalian microRNAs uncovers a subset of brain-expressed microRNAs with possible roles in murine and human neuronal differentiation. Genome Biol. 2004; 5:R13 [PMID: 15003116]
  10. Lehmann U, Hasemeier B, Christgen M, Muller M, Romermann D, Langer F, Kreipe H. Epigenetic inactivation of microRNA gene hsa-mir-9–1 in human breast cancer. J Pathol. 2008; 214:17-24. [PMID: 17948228]
  11. Hsu PY, Deatherage DE, Rodriguez BA, Liyanarachchi S, Weng YI, Zuo T, Liu J, Cheng AS, Huang TH. Xenoestrogen-induced epigenetic repression of microRNA-9–3 in breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2009; 69:5936-45. [PMID: 19549897]
  12. Bandres E, Agirre X, Bitarte N, Ramirez N, Zarate R, Roman-Gomez J, Prosper F, Garcia-Foncillas J. Epigenetic regulation of microRNA expression in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009; 125:2737-43. [PMID: 19521961]
  13. Omura N, Li CP, Li A, Hong SM, Walter K, Jimeno A, Hidalgo M, Goggins M. Genome-wide profiling of methylated promoters in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008; 7:1146-56. [PMID: 18535405]
  14. Hébert SS, Horre K, Nicolai L, Papadopoulou AS, Mandemakers W, Silahtaroglu AN, Kauppinen S, Delacourte A, De Strooper B. Loss of microRNA cluster miR-29a/b-1 in sporadic Alzheimer's disease correlates with increased BACE1/beta-secretase expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105:6415-20. [PMID: 18434550]
  15. Lukiw WJ. Micro-RNA speciation in fetal, adult and Alzheimer's disease hippocampus. Neuroreport. 2007; 18:297-300. [PMID: 17314675]
  16. Krichevsky AM, King KS, Donahue CP, Khrapko K, Kosik KS. A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development. RNA. 2003; 9:1274-81. [PMID: 13130141]
  17. Zhao JJ, Sun DG, Wang J, Liu SR, Zhang CY, Zhu MX, Ma X. Retinoic acid downregulates microRNAs to induce abnormal development of spinal cord in spina bifida rat model. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008; 24:485-92. [PMID: 17962954]
  18. Lukiw WJ, Pogue AI. Induction of specific micro RNA (miRNA) species by ROS-generating metal sulfates in primary human brain cells. J Inorg Biochem. 2007; 101:1265-9. [PMID: 17629564]
  19. Pietrzykowski AZ, Friesen RM, Martin GE, Puig SI, Nowak CL, Wynne PM, Siegelmann HT, Treistman SN. Posttranscriptional regulation of BK channel splice variant stability by miR-9 underlies neuroadaptation to alcohol. Neuron. 2008; 59:274-87. [PMID: 18667155]
  20. Cai J, Nelson KC, Wu M, Sternberg P, , Jr Jones DP. Oxidative damage and protection of the RPE. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000; 19:205-21. [PMID: 10674708]
  21. Alizadeh M, Wada M, Gelfman CM, Handa JT, Hjelmeland LM. Downregulation of differentiation specific gene expression by oxidative stress in ARPE-19 cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42:2706-13. [PMID: 11581219]
  22. Dunn KC, Aotaki-Keen AE, Putkey FR, Hjelmeland LM. ARPE-19, a human retinal pigment epithelial cell line with differentiated properties. Exp Eye Res. 1996; 62:155-69. [PMID: 8698076]
  23. Gao X, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Talalay P. Powerful and prolonged protection of human retinal pigment epithelial cells, keratinocytes, and mouse leukemia cells against oxidative damage: the indirect antioxidant effects of sulforaphane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98:15221-6. [PMID: 11752465]
  24. King A, Gottlieb E, Brooks DG, Murphy MP, Dunaief JL. Mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species mediate blue light-induced death of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Photochem Photobiol. 2004; 79:470-5. [PMID: 15191057]
  25. Thurman JM, Renner B, Kunchithapautham K, Ferreira VP, Pangburn MK, Ablonczy Z, Tomlinson S, Holers VM, Rohrer B. Oxidative stress renders retinal pigment epithelial cells susceptible to complement-mediated injury. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284:16939-47. [PMID: 19386604]
  26. Samuel W, Kutty RK, Nagineni S, Vijayasarathy C, Chandraratna RA, Wiggert BN. -(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide induces apoptosis in human retinal pigment epithelial cells: retinoic acid receptors regulate apoptosis, reactive oxygen species generation, and the expression of heme oxygenase-1 and Gadd153. J Cell Physiol. 2006; 209:854-65. [PMID: 16972258]
  27. Schug J. Using TESS to predict transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequence. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2008; Chapter 2:Unit 2 6.
  28. Lu S, Davies PJ. Regulation of the expression of the tissue transglutaminase gene by DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997; 94:4692-7. [PMID: 9114053]
  29. Karali M, Peluso I, Marigo V, Banfi S. Identification and characterization of microRNAs expressed in the mouse eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:509-15. [PMID: 17251443]
  30. Deo M, Yu JY, Chung KH, Tippens M, Turner DL. Detection of mammalian microRNA expression by in situ hybridization with RNA oligonucleotides. Dev Dyn. 2006; 235:2538-48. [PMID: 16736490]
  31. Xu S. microRNA expression in the eyes and their significance in relation to functions. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28:87-116. [PMID: 19071227]
  32. Lavker RM, Jia Y, Ryan DG. The tiny world of microRNAs in the cross hairs of the mammalian eye. Hum Genomics. 2009; 3:332-48. [PMID: 19706364]
  33. Arora A, McKay GJ, Simpson DA. Prediction and verification of miRNA expression in human and rat retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:3962-7. [PMID: 17724173]
  34. Huang KM, Dentchev T, Stambolian D. MiRNA expression in the eye. Mamm Genome. 2008; 19:510-6. [PMID: 18648874]
  35. Loscher CJ, Hokamp K, Kenna PF, Ivens AC, Humphries P, Palfi A, Farrar GJ. Altered retinal microRNA expression profile in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Genome Biol. 2007; 8:R248 [PMID: 18034880]
  36. Ryan DG, Oliveira-Fernandes M, Lavker RM. MicroRNAs of the mammalian eye display distinct and overlapping tissue specificity. Mol Vis. 2006; 12:1175-84. [PMID: 17102797]
  37. Xu S, Witmer PD, Lumayag S, Kovacs B, Valle D. MicroRNA (miRNA) transcriptome of mouse retina and identification of a sensory organ-specific miRNA cluster. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:25053-66. [PMID: 17597072]
  38. Lee IH, Lee JH, Lee MJ, Lee SY, Kim IS. Involvement of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha in haptoglobin gene expression by all-trans-retinoic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 294:956-61. [PMID: 12074569]
  39. Masaki T, Matsuura T, Ohkawa K, Miyamura T, Okazaki I, Watanabe T, Suzuki T. All-trans retinoic acid down-regulates human albumin gene expression through the induction of C/EBPbeta-LIP. Biochem J. 2006; 397:345-53. [PMID: 16608438]
  40. Liang R, Bates DJ, Wang E. Epigenetic control of microRNA expression and aging. Curr Genomics. 2009; 10:184-93. [PMID: 19881911]
  41. Weber B, Stresemann C, Brueckner B, Lyko F. Methylation of human microRNA genes in normal and neoplastic cells. Cell Cycle. 2007; 6:1001-5. [PMID: 17457051]
  42. Hao-Xiang T, Qian W, Lian-Zhou C, Xiao-Hui H, Jin-Song C, Xin-Hui F, Liang-Qi C, Xi-Ling C, Wen L, Long-Juan Z. MicroRNA-9 reduces cell invasion and E-cadherin secretion in SK-Hep-1 cell. Med Oncol. 2009; [PMID: 19572217]
  43. Shibata M, Kurokawa D, Nakao H, Ohmura T, Aizawa S. MicroRNA-9 modulates Cajal-Retzius cell differentiation by suppressing Foxg1 expression in mouse medial pallium. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:10415-21. [PMID: 18842901]
  44. Jacquemin P, Lannoy VJ, O'Sullivan J, Read A, Lemaigre FP, Rousseau GG. The transcription factor onecut-2 controls the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001; 285:1200-5. [PMID: 11478782]
  45. Roush S, Slack FJ. The let-7 family of microRNAs. Trends Cell Biol. 2008; 18:505-16. [PMID: 18774294]
  46. Büssing I, Slack FJ, Grosshans H. let-7 microRNAs in development, stem cells and cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2008; 14:400-9. [PMID: 18674967]
  47. Le MT, Teh C, Shyh-Chang N, Xie H, Zhou B, Korzh V, Lodish HF, Lim B. MicroRNA-125b is a novel negative regulator of p53. Genes Dev. 2009; 23:862-76. [PMID: 19293287]
  48. Le MT, Xie H, Zhou B, Chia PH, Rizk P, Um M, Udolph G, Yang H, Lim B, Lodish HF. MicroRNA-125b promotes neuronal differentiation in human cells by repressing multiple targets. Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 29:5290-305. [PMID: 19635812]
  49. Lal A, Navarro F, Maher CA, Maliszewski LE, Yan N, O'Day E, Chowdhury D, Dykxhoorn DM, Tsai P, Hofmann O, Becker KG, Gorospe M, Hide W, Lieberman J. miR-24 Inhibits cell proliferation by targeting E2F2, MYC, and other cell-cycle genes via binding to “seedless” 3′UTR microRNA recognition elements. Mol Cell. 2009; 35:610-25. [PMID: 19748357]
  50. Mishra PJ, Humeniuk R, Longo-Sorbello GS, Banerjee D, Bertino A, Jr. miR-24 microRNA binding-site polymorphism in dihydrofolate reductase gene leads to methotrexate resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104:13513-8. [PMID: 17686970]
  51. Wang Q, Huang Z, Xue H, Jin C, Ju XL, Han JD, Chen YG. MicroRNA miR-24 inhibits erythropoiesis by targeting activin type I receptor ALK4. Blood. 2008; 111:588-95. [PMID: 17906079]
  52. Ren XP, Wu J, Wang X, Sartor MA, Qian J, Jones K, Nicolaou P, Pritchard TJ, Fan GC. MicroRNA-320 is involved in the regulation of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury by targeting heat-shock protein 20. Circulation. 2009; 119:2357-66. [PMID: 19380620]
  53. Schaar DG, Medina DJ, Moore DF, Strair RK, Ting Y. miR-320 targets transferrin receptor 1 (CD71) and inhibits cell proliferation. Exp Hematol. 2009; 37:245-55. [PMID: 19135902]
  54. Rogler CE, Levoci L, Ader T, Massimi A, Tchaikovskaya T, Norel R, Rogler LE. MicroRNA-23b cluster microRNAs regulate transforming growth factor-beta/bone morphogenetic protein signaling and liver stem cell differentiation by targeting Smads. Hepatology. 2009; 50:575-84. [PMID: 19582816]
  55. Shen J, Yang X, Xie B, Chen Y, Swaim M, Hackett SF, Campochiaro PA. MicroRNAs regulate ocular neovascularization. Mol Ther. 2008; 16:1208-16. [PMID: 18500251]
  56. Wang FE, Zhang C, Maminishkis A, Dong L, Zhi C, Li R, Zhao J, Majerciak V, Gaur AB, Chen S, Miller SS. MicroRNA-204/211 alters epithelial physiology. FASEB J. 2010; 24:1552-71. [PMID: 20056717]