Table 5 of Bhatia, Mol Vis 2016; 22:898-916.

Table 5. Geographic location study–Eccentricity as a function of distance from optic nerve head.

Comparison: eccentricity Mean 1 Mean 2 Mean Diff. SEM of diff. n1 n2 q DF Significant? Adjusted P Value
Macula versus Mid-Periphery 0.5274 0.5813 −0.05385 0.01396 4 4 5.455 9 Yes 0.0097
Macula versus Far-Periphery 0.5274 0.6733 −0.1459 0.01396 4 4 14.78 9 Yes <0.0001
Mid-Periphery versus Far-Periphery 0.5813 0.6733 −0.09209 0.01396 4 4 9.327 9 Yes 0.0003

1-way ANOVA with Tukey analysis of eccentricity. Geographic spots or locations were defined as in Figure 2A and Table 2. The data suggest that cells in the far periphery were more eccentric than those in the macula and mid-periphery. Also, cells in the macula were less eccentric than those in the mid-periphery.

Bhatia, Mol Vis 2016; 22:898-916. http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v22/898

©2016 Molecular Vision http://www.molvis.org/molvis/

ISSN 1090-0535