Molecular Vision: Bhatia, Mol Vis 2016; 22:898-916. Table 2

Table 2. Geographic location study–Cell density as a function of distance from optic nerve head.

Comparison: Cell density	Mean 1	Mean 2	Mean Diff.	SEM of diff.	n1	n2	q	DF	Significant?	Adjusted P Value
Macula versus Mid Periphery	454	414.5	39.47	53.26	4	4	1.048	9	No	0.7462
Macula versus Far Periphery	454	205.1	248.9	53.26	4	4	6.609	9	Yes	0.003
Mid-Periphery versus Far Periphery	414.5	205.1	209.4	53.26	4	4	5.561	9	Yes	0.0087

1-way ANOVA with Tukey analysis of Cell Density. Geographic spots or locations were defined as follows from left to right as illustrated in Figure 2A— “Macula” represents the first four images, left to right. The “mid–periphery” is defined as Images 5–8. The “Far periphery” represents all the remaining images: 9-through whatever remained. The data suggest that cells in the far periphery were less dense than those in the macula and mid-periphery.