Table 3 of Bhatia, Mol Vis 2016; 22:898-916.

Table 3. Geographic location study–Cell area as a function of distance from optic nerve head.

Comparison: Cell Area Mean 1 Mean 2 Mean Diff. SEM of diff. n1 n2 q DF Significant? Adjusted P Value
Macula versus Mid-Periphery 517.6 572.5 −54.91 75.5 4 4 1.029 9 No 0.7541
Macula versus Far-Periphery 517.6 1191 −673.6 75.5 4 4 12.62 9 Yes <0.0001
Mid Periphery versus Far Periphery 572.5 1191 −618.7 75.5 4 4 11.59 9 Yes <0.0001

1-way ANOVA with Tukey analysis of Cell Area. Geographic spots or locations were defined as in Figure 2A and Table 2. The data suggest that cells in the far periphery had larger cell areas than those in the macula and mid-periphery.

Bhatia, Mol Vis 2016; 22:898-916. http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v22/898

©2016 Molecular Vision http://www.molvis.org/molvis/

ISSN 1090-0535