Received 29 December 2010 | Accepted 23 May 2011 | Published 27 May 2011
The first two authors contributed equally to the work
1Laboratory For Molecular Reproduction and Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India; 2Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
Correspondence to: Dr. Rima Dada, Additional Professor, Laboratory For Molecular Reproduction and Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India-110029; Phone: +91-11-26546716; FAX: +91-11-26588663; email: email@example.com
Purpose: To screen the paired box gene 6 (PAX6) gene in irido-fundal coloboma.
Methods: The entire coding region of PAX6 including intron-exon boundaries was amplified from cases (n=30) and controls (n=30). All sequences were analyzed against the ensemble sequence (ENSG00000007372) for PAX6.
Results: DNA sequence analysis of patients and controls revealed a total of three nucleotide changes (g.31815391Cytosine>Thymine; Glycine72Glycine and g.31812215Thymine>Guanine) of which one was neutral/synonymous change and the remaining two were intronic changes. Of these 3 changes, 2 were novel and one was already reported change. All these changes were non-pathogenic, according to in silico analysis.
Conclusions: In our study no pathogenic PAX6 mutation were identified. This suggests involvement of other coloboma genes. This study expands the SNP spectrum of PAX6, only rare variations which are not causative have been found. Since this is a pilot study in the north Indian population, results should be confirmed in different populations by similar studies. Familial cases are required for determining the underlying genetic loci accounting for this clinical phenotype and may lead to better understanding of disease pathogenesis.
Congenital malformations of the eyeball appear to occur more frequently in certain countries like India and Sri Lanka, accounting for approximately 25% of cases of visual impairment and blindness . Ocular coloboma is a congenital, common, and heterogeneous malformation which includes a spectrum of anomalies ranging from iris coloboma to clinical anophthalmos. Ocular coloboma, as an isolated defect, is usually inherited as an autosomal dominant disorder, although autosomal recessive inheritance also occurs. Coloboma is a hole in one of the structures of the eye, such as the iris, retina, choroid, or optic disc. If coloboma is present both in iris and retina it is known as irido-fundal coloboma. According to coloboma location in the retina and whether it involves the optic nerve or not, coloboma is classified into six types by Gopal : (I) this involves the optic nerve and is the biggest type of coloboma (Figure 1). Vision is generally quite poor in this type; (II) involves the optic nerve but it is smaller than type I, so vision is poor but not as bad as in type I coloboma; (III) this just misses the optic nerve (Figure 2) so vision can be quite good. However if associated with increased axial length and resulting high myopic refractive error (spectacle number) the vision can be decreased; (IV) this coloboma involves only the optic nerve but not much retina that surrounds it. Vision can be good to average depending on how much the optic nerve is distorted; (V) this coloboma is in the periphery and does not involve the optic nerve as well as the main area of the retina (Figure 3). As far as vision is considered it is quite good in this type and any problem in vision might not be noticed by the patient; (VI) these are partially aborted attempts at forming coloboma. Vision is unaffected in this type of coloboma.
The estimated prevalence of coloboma is 1 in 10,000 in the world population [3,4]. Coloboma associated with other syndromes may cause up to 10% of the childhood blindness . The genetic basis of coloboma remains elusive. Recent studies suggest that earlier developmental processes in eye are controlled by a complex network of transcriptional factors, cell cycle regulators and diffusible signaling molecules .
Paired box gene 6 (PAX6), a member of the paired box family of transcription factors, has been identified as a key regulator of eye development in both vertebrates and invertebrates [7-9]. During early mouse eye development, expression of Pax6 has been shown in the presumptive lens ectoderm, lens placode, lens vesicle and optic vesicle [10,11]. At later stages, Pax6 is found in epithelia of conjunctiva, cornea, lens, and ciliary body and in the neural retina [12,13]. In humans, mutations in PAX6 have been demonstrated in several patients with aniridia [14-17], a panocular disease that is associated with iris hypoplasia, corneal opacification, cataract, foveal dysplasia, and other diseases .
PAX6 is located on chromosome 11p13 acts as transcriptional regulator of other genes that are associated with coloboma. This gene contains 14 exons and encodes a 422-amino acid polypeptide containing two DNA-binding domains, a bipartite paired domain, and a paired type homeodomain . The paired domain, which is coded by exons 5–7 of PAX6, has two subdomains: the relatively conserved 74-amino acid NH2-terminal sub-domain and the more divergent 54-amino acid COOH-terminal subdomain. The latter sub-domain is a common place for mutations [19,20]. Currently there are around 500 mutations that have been reported (Human PAX6 Allelic Variant Database (HPAVD). Most PAX6 nonsense mutations lead to aniridia, while missense mutations are related to foveal hypoplasia, congenital cataracts, or anterior segment anomalies [21,22].
In this preliminary pilot study we have screened PAX6 for mutations in irido-fundal coloboma patients (n=30) and normal healthy controls (n=30).
The research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki in the treatment of the subject reported herein. The study was approved by institutional review board (IRB # IRB00006862) of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and all participants gave their written informed consent. A total of thirty coloboma patients presented at the Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences (AIIMS, New Delhi, India) were enrolled in this study. Clinical evaluation involved fundoscopy (direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy), slitlamp-biomicroscopy, and retinoscopy. Of these patients, 18 were males and 12 were females. Mean age of presentation was 16.32 years. Diagnosis of coloboma involved the presence of deficient of iris tissue and presence of coloboma in retina on clinical examination. All cases were sporadic without any family history. All cases secondary to causes like trauma etc. were excluded from the study.
After informed consent, detailed personal, medical, and occupational history was collected and a family tree up to three generations was drawn. Thirty ethnically matched normal individuals without any ocular disorder were enrolled as controls. Health information was obtained from controls through the questionnaire; all underwent ophthalmological examination and a blood sample (5 ml) was collected in EDTA (EDTA) vacutainers (Greiner Bio-One, GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany) from patients and controls for DNA extraction. DNA was extracted from whole blood samples of all patients and controls using the phenol-chloroform method.
Each reaction was performed in a 25 µl mixture containing 0.2 µM each primer, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 2.5 µl of 10× PCR buffer (Biogene, New Delhi, India) with 2.5 mM MgCl2, and approximately 100 ng genomic DNA. PCR was performed in thermal cycler (My Cycler; BioRad, Gurgaon, India) under the conditions shown in Table 1.
All PCR products were analyzed on 1.8% agarose gel stained with ethidium-bromide (EtBr; 10 mg/ml). Agarose gels were analyzed using the Gel Documentation System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Amplified PCR products were purified using gel/PCR DNA fragments extraction kit (Catalog number DF100; Geneaid Biotech Ltd., Sijhih City, Taiwan). Purified PCR products were outsourced for sequencing at Molecular Cloning Laboratories (MCLAB, South San Francisco, CA).
DNA sequences were compared with the human PAX6 reference sequence.
DNA sequence analysis of patients and controls revealed a total of three nucleotide changes. Of which one was neutral/synonymous and novel change. The remaining two changes were intronic, one of which was novel. Details of these cases are tabulated (Table 2).
A novel single nucleotide change from cytosine (C) to thymine (T) at genomic position g. 31815391 (Figure 4) was present in one case but absent in controls. The alteration is located in intron 9 (IVS9+40). This change was registered at GenBank with accession number HQ397715.
In this mutation a single nucleotide T was replaced by guanine (G) at genomic position g.31823250; cDNA position c.216; codon 72 resulted in a codon change GGT>GGG which predicts a synonymous change p.Gly72Gly (p.G72G; Figure 5). This change was present as heterozygous change in 29 cases and 20 controls; and as a homozygous change in one case. This change was novel and registered at GenBank with accession number HQ397714.
A single nucleotide change from T to G at genomic position g.31812215 (Figure 6) was present in six cases and one control. The alteration is located in intron 12 (IVS13–42).
Improved splice site prediction for both intronic changes showed that the location of these changes is not present at a splice site and may not create splicing error in the PAX6 protein.
The genetic basis of coloboma remains elusive. Recent studies suggest that earlier developmental process in the eye are controlled by a complex network of transcriptional factors, cell cycle regulators, and diffusible signaling molecules . Mutations in these genes may lead to ocular coloboma. It has been proposed that PAX6 acts as a transcriptional regulator of many other genes involved in ocular development. PAX6 mutations have been identified in sporadic aniridia cases from different populations  as well as in familial aniridia cases [14-16]. In this study we have screened PAX6 in irido-fundal coloboma patients and controls and we observed 3 changes (2 intronic changes and one synonymous/neutral change). However, no pathogenic PAX6 mutation was identified in our patients.
Mutations in PAX2 were identified in individuals with ocular coloboma in renal coloboma syndrome . PAX2 is a member of a multi-gene family containing a paired box domain that was identical in Drosophila and subsequently in vertebrates . PAX2 expression is critical for development of urogenital tract, central nervous system (CNS), inner ear, and optic nerve. Further studies suggest that PAX2 mutations are not common in patients with isolated ocular coloboma and associated anomalies .
The absence of PAX6 mutations in our study population suggests the involvement of other coloboma genes showed by Zhang et al. . This study expands the SNP spectrum of PAX6, only rare variations which are not causative have been found. Since this is a pilot study in the north Indian population, our results should be confirmed in different populations by similar studies. However, the absence of PAX6 mutations in selected population do not rule out the possibility of involvement of this gene in coloboma. Friling et al.  have shown the deletion of the whole gene (11p) in a patient with uveal colobomata. So there is still a possibility for PAX6 to be involved in coloboma cases which can be detected by CGH array. As the frequency of the congenital blindness is more in Asian countries , where a majority of the population has vitamin A deficiency which is required for normal expression of several genes involved in ocular morphogenesis. Vitamin A is critical during eye development and optic fissure fails to close in vitamin A deficient embryos . It has been reported that Pitx2 expression is downregulated in vitamin A deficient embryos and this gene is required for optic fissure closure. Epidemiological evidences has shown the teratogenic effect of vitamin A deficiency during pregnancy. Thus screening of the candidate gene is required in large number of cases. Familial cases are required for determination of the underlying genetic loci accounting for this clinical phenotype which may lead to better understanding of disease pathogenesis in near future.
The authors would like to thank the families of the patients for their co-operation. The authors also thank AIIMS for providing financial support.