Molecular Vision 2010; 16:1353-1360
Received 3 March 2010 | Accepted 12 July 2010 | Published 15 July 2010
The first two authors contributed equally to this study
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 2Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; 3Joint Shantou International Eye Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
Correspondence to: Prof. C.P. Pang, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Phone: +852 27623169; FAX: +852 27159490; email:firstname.lastname@example.org
Purpose: Retinitis pigmentosa 1 (RP1) is a major gene responsible for both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (RP). We have previously identified three disease-causing mutations out of 174 RP patients. In this study, we investigated a new cohort of Chinese RP patients to further evaluate the contribution of RP1 mutations to cause RP.
Methods: A group of 55 nonsyndromic RP patients, the majority of them isolated cases or without information on family history, were screened for mutations in the entire coding sequences of RP1, using direct DNA sequencing. All detected variants were genotyped in 190 controls, while the three putative mutations were additionally genotyped in 362 controls subjects. Web-based programs, including PolyPhen, Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT), Prediction of Pathological Mutations (PMUT), Single Amino Acid Polymorphism Disease-Association Predictor (SAP), ScanProsite, and ClustalW2, were used to predict the potential functional and structural impacts of the missense variants on RP1.
Results: A total of 14 sequence changes were identified. Among them, five were novel and found only in the RP patients. Two missense variants (p.K1370E and p.R1652L), which are conserved in primates, were predicted to have functional and structural impacts on the RP1 protein. The other three variants (c.787+34T>C, p.I408L and p.L2015L) were considered benign.
Conclusions: If these two novel missense variants are in fact pathogenic, then RP1 mutations account for approximately 2.18% (5/229) of RP cases in our Chinese cohort; this is similar to other ethnic groups. However, a relatively higher frequency of missense mutations found in the Chinese patients may suggest an ethnic diversity in the RP1 mutation patterns.
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP; OMIM 268000; Mendelian Inheritance in Man; National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD) refers to a heterogeneous group of inherited retinal dystrophies characterized by night blindness and progressive loss of visual field due to the degeneration of rod photoreceptors in the retina. In the late stage, the central vision will be affected, resulting in irreversible blindness . Prevalence of RP is between 1/4,000 [2-5] and 1/6,000  in western countries. Among Chinese, the prevalence was 1/3,784 in a dispersed region of China . In the Peking eye study, the estimated prevalence was as high as 1/1,000 among people aged over 40 in northern China .
RP can present as autosomal recessive (arRP, 10%–45%), autosomal dominant (adRP, 10%–30%), or X-linked (xlRP, 0%–15%). Around 35%–50% of RP cases have been denoted as simplex RP (sRP) because of the absence of known family history of RP or segregation pattern [2,3,5,6,9-11]. More than 40 genes have been identified to cause RP, of which 20, 26, and two genes were responsible for adRP, arRP, and xlRP, respectively (RetNet, the Retinal Information Network, provided in the public domain by the University of Texas Houston Health Science Center, Houston, TX, accessed March 7, 2010). The RP1 locus was mapped by linkage testing in a large adRP family in southeastern Kentucky [12,13]. The gene subsequently linked to adRP was named retinitis pigmentosa 1 (RP1, OMIM 603937) . Later studies revealed that mutations in RP1 cause both dominant [14-17] and recessive forms of RP [18,19]. Most RP1 mutations are single nucleotide substitutions that produce a premature stop codon or insertion/deletion changes, resulting in a truncated protein in Caucasian populations . These mutations were predicted to truncate the RP1 protein by approximately 50% to 70% of the full length. Only a few missense variants, such as p.T373I , p.K663N , p.A669T , p.D984G , and p.L1808P , have been found to be disease causing. RP1 is expressed prominently, if not only, in the photoreceptor cells of the retina [15,19,22,23] and is involved in the correct orientation and higher order stacking of outer segment discs . RP1 is a microtubule-associated protein forming part of the photoreceptor axoneme  and thus plays an important role in photoreceptor function.
We previously evaluated the mutation profiles of RP1 in Chinese RP patients by studying unrelated RP patients with mixed phenotypes. We found that RP1 mutations (p.R677X and p.D984G) accounted for about 1.2% of overall RP [21,26,27], apparently lower than that in other populations [1,28]. Recently, we identified two truncation mutations causing arRP in a Chinese family . In this study, we screened for additional RP patients and control subjects to complement the mutation profile of RP1 in Chinese patients.
All study subjects recruited were of Chinese ethnicity and were given complete ocular examinations, including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, electroretinography, and fundus photography. Diagnosis of nonsyndromic RP was based on ophthalmic investigations and absence of systemic signs associated with syndromic RP. Subjects were confirmed to be free of any other major eye diseases, except mild senile cataract in some elderly subjects. In total, 55 unrelated RP patients were recruited, including 32 females and 23 males, with ages ranging from 19 to 84 years. Inheritance patterns of the disease were defined according to the family history of the subjects. In some cases, however, there was no information about the family structure for heredity classification. The control subjects were all unrelated, older than 60 years, and had no family history of RP from which 190 of them (53 males and 137 females) were from Hong Kong and had been described in our previous studies [26,27]. We also added another 362 controls for validation of the putative mutations: 35 subjects from Hong Kong (11 males and 24 females, age range 70 to 90 years), 180 from Beijing in northern China  (88 males and 92 females, age range 60 to 89 years), and 147 from Shantou in southern China (53 males and 94 females, age range 63 to 96 years). All controls received routine follow-up and complete ophthalmic examination to ensure that they remained free of RP or other major eye diseases except mild senile cataract. Written informed consents were obtained from all study subjects after explanation of the nature of the study. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human Research, the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the respective review board on human subject research at each participating academic institution. Peripheral venous whole blood, 5 ml, was collected from each patient in EDTA tubes and stored at −80 °C before genetic analysis.
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using a commercial kit (QIAamp DNA Blood kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief the frozen whole blood samples were thawed and blood cells lysed in QIAGEN Protease and Buffer AL in the kit. The DNA was obtained by precipitation. Twenty-six amplicons covering all three coding exons and the exon–intron boundaries of RP1, as previously described [21,26], were amplified in all patients and the 190 Hong Kong controls by PCR and analyzed by direct DNA sequencing using dye-termination chemistry (Big-Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Reaction Kit; ver. 3.1; Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA) on a DNA sequencer (3130XL; Applied Biosystems), according to the supplier’s protocol. The DNA sequences were compared with the human RP1 (ENSG00000104237) sequence in the Ensembl database. Any rare variants detected were double confirmed by bidirectional sequencing. The novel putative mutations were further genotyped in the additional 362 control subjects.
We defined a variant as “novel” if it had not been reported in the literature or registered in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) database (provided in the public domain by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD). A variant was regarded as potentially disease causing if it was (1) expected to alter the amino acid sequence of the protein, (2) exclusively observed in patients with RP, while completely absent from the control subjects, and (3) predicted to alter the protein structure or function through in silico analysis.
For the common RP1 sequence variants with minor allele frequency >5% detected in both patients and controls, genotype frequencies were compared between the two groups in a dominant genetic model using the χ2 test in SPSS (ver.15.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A Bonferroni method was used to correct the p values in multiple comparisons. For the rare missense variants detected exclusively in the RP patients, we used four web-based programs to evaluate possible biologic effects of the amino acid substitution on the structure and function of the RP1 protein, including (1) Polymorphism Phenotyping (PolyPhen provided by the Bork Group and the Sunyaev Lab, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), (2) Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT, provided in the public domain by the J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD), (3) Prediction of Pathological Mutations (PMUT, provided by the Molecular Recognition and Bioinformatics Group, Institute for Research in Biomedicine-Barcelona Science Park and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain), and (4) the Single Amino Acid Polymorphism Disease-Association Predictor (SAP disease-association predictor, provided by the Sapred Team, Center for Bioinformatics, Peking University, Beijing, China). Possible alterations of protein motifs and functional sites were assessed by scanning through the PROSITE database (ScanProsite, provided by the Swiss-Prot group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland). We further examined evolutionary conservation of the amino acid residues in these variants by multiple sequence alignment using the ClustalW2 program (provided by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK).
Based on family information, the 55 nonsyndromic RP patients presented with mixed inheritance patterns, with five (9.09%) being classified as adRP, five (9.09%) as arRP, two (3.6%) as xlRP, and 23 (41.8%) as sRP. The remaining 20 patients had an unknown inheritance pattern due to the lack of familial data.
A total of 14 RP1 variants were identified (Table 1). Among them, six (p.R872H, p.N985Y, p.A1670T, p.S1691P, p.Q1725Q, and p.C2033Y) were common SNPs registered in the SNP database. These six SNPs were found at high frequencies among the control subjects. Association analyses showed that none of them was significantly associated with RP (pcorr>0.05). Therefore, they were not considered disease-causing mutations.
We also identified eight rare variants, three of which (p.G706R, p.Q1008Q, and c.6542C>T) occurred in both the case and control subjects. The remaining five were novel and not detected in the 552 control subjects from different areas of China. Two of them (p.L2015L and intronic c.787+34T>C) did not lead to amino acid change, while the other three (p.I408L, p.K1370E, and p.R1652L) were missense changes.
The impact of variant p.I408L was predicted to be “Borderline” by PolyPhen, “Tolerated” by SIFT, and “Neutral” by PMUT, with a maximum reliability index of 9 (Table 2). The Grantham score was 5. Based on these assessments, p.I408L is less likely to be a disease-causing mutation. The variant p.K1370E was predicted as “Potentially damaging” and “Potentially Intolerant” by PolyPhen and SIFT, respectively. Although predicted to be “Pathological” by PMUT (reliability index of 0). The Grantham score for this substitution was 56, being moderately conservative. Therefore, p.K1370E is potentially disease causing. For the p.R1652L variant, the predictions were “Possibly damaging” by PolyPhen, “Potentially Intolerant” by SIFT, and “Pathological” (reliability index of 7) by PMUT. With a Grantham score of 102, p.R1652L should be moderately radical and highly likely to be a functional mutation. PROSITE scanning showed that no structural or functional domain was present at or around these two residues. However, the variant p.R1652L was predicted to abolish one possible protein kinase C phosphorylation site on the RP1 protein (Table 3). Determination of the evolutionary conservation of p.K1370E and p.R1652L by multiple amino acid sequence alignment of the human RP1 with the protein sequences derived from chimpanzee, rhesus monkey, dog, horse, murine, and cattle showed that both residues 1370 and 1652 in RP1 were conserved among the primates (Figure 1).
In the present study, we sequenced the RP1 gene in 55 newly recruited Chinese RP patients and identified five novel variants, providing new information about the variation pattern of the gene. Of the five variants, three missense variants were exclusively found in RP patients and absent in the 552 control subjects. Therefore, they are considered excellent candidate disease-causing mutations. Unfortunately, as the family members of these three patients did not provide consent to join our study, we were not able to perform segregation analysis for the putative mutations. We therefore used in silico analysis to provide some insights into their impacts. The three programs, i.e., PolyPhen, SIFT, and the Grantham score, are frequently used algorithms in the prediction of the functionality of missense SNPs [31,32]. However, their predictions may sometimes be inconsistent, although strong concordances have been observed . We therefore applied the PMUT program to provide additional assessment. By using these tools we would expect that p.I408L is less likely to be a functional mutation (Table 2), although a segregation study would be of great interest to confirm its role. This variant occurred in a patient with adRP. Ocular and electroretinography examinations revealed a typical sign of RP (data not shown). By mutational analyses of rhodopsin (RHO, OMIM 180380), photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor (NR2E3, OMIM 604485), and neural retina leucine zipper (NRL, OMIM 162080) , we did not find any variants in this subject (data not shown). Therefore, the adRP in this patient is likely to be caused by another yet-to-be-identified mutation. In contrast, the variant p.R1652L was likely to be a deleterious substitution with consistent predictions by PolyPhen, SIFT, PMUT, and Grantham score. Variant p.K1370E was also predicted to be deleterious by the four programs, although with a lower reliability index (Table 2). Meanwhile p.R1652 and p.K1370 were conserved among primates (Figure 1). They are located in the region of the RP1 polypeptide where many mutations occur. Furthermore, p.R1652L was predicted to abolish one possible protein kinase C phosphorylation site on the protein (Table 3). Protein phosphorylation is an important posttranslational modification process that can alter the conformation and thus function and localization of the protein . The predicted abolishment of the phosphorylation site can affect the normal functioning of RP1. As a whole, our results are consistent for pathologic roles of p.R1652L and p.K1370E in RP. The patients with these postulated mutations had typical clinical presentations of RP (Figure 2), although the clinical presentations appear less severe than the truncation mutation carrier . Notably, the p.R1652L and p.K1370E carriers were classified as sRP because their parents did not have the disease. Thus, these two variants could be de novo mutations causing adRP or could cause arRP in a digenic pattern co-dominantly with another yet-to-identify mutation, which is worth further investigation.
In our previous studies, we identified two RP1 mutations, p.R677X and p.D984G, in two out of 173 Hong Kong Chinese RP patients [21,26]. Recently we identified two truncation mutations (c.5_6delGT and c.4941_4942insT) causing arRP in a Chinese pedigree . Combining these findings with the two missense mutations detected in the current study, the total contribution of RP1 mutations is approximately 2.18% (5/229, 95% confidence interval 0.93%–5.0%) in our Chinese cohort. So far, studies evaluating the RP1 in other Chinese RP cohorts are limited. Recently, Sheng et al.  identified the p.N985Y variant as the disease-causing mutation for adRP, being co-segregated with the disease in the pedigree and absent in 105 controls. Interestingly, the p.N985Y variant was found to be very common in our study cohort, presenting in 14.2% (27/190) of control subjects. We do not know whether the pedigree is of Han Chinese ethnicity due to the lack of data in the Sheng et al.  report. We would expect, however, that ethnic diversity of the RP1 mutation pattern also exists within Chinese populations. In the study of Sheng et al.,  another three missense variants (p.P63I, p.G79E, and p.P903L) were also found to occur at high frequencies and exclusively in the patient group, although the disease-causative properties remained inconclusive . In contrast, no truncation mutation was found in their cohort. In light of their findings and ours, missense RP1 mutations may be playing a prominent role in the genetic epidemiology of RP in Chinese populations. Further studies in other Chinese cohorts with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm this.
To date, at least 41 RP1 mutations that are causative for RP have been reported, most of which are truncation mutations. It is noteworthy that, at least one-half of the known missense mutations occur in Chinese RP patients (Table 4), while only three out of 33 (9%) known truncations have been identified in all the published Chinese RP1 mutations (Figure 3). In contrast, most known truncation mutations were detected in other populations, with the most frequent mutation, p.R677X, presenting in approximately 3% of adRP patients in the United States ; it has also presented at relatively high frequencies in the UK  and Italian  populations. Hence, there are distinctly differential RP1 mutation patterns existing, if not globally, at least between the Chinese and Caucasian populations.
So far, most confirmed pathologic mutations in RP1 among different populations are nonsense or frameshift mutations located in exon 4. These mutant transcripts are predicted to be insensitive to the nonsense-mediated decay pathway, leading to the production of truncated proteins lacking one-half to two-thirds of the C-terminal portion . As it has been suggested that haploinsufficiency of RP1 is not causative for RP , these truncated proteins may exert their role in the pathogenesis of RP through a dominant negative effect. Likewise, the missense mutations may also play a role in RP etiology through a similar mechanism, which has yet to be elucidated by functional assays.
In summary, we have identified two novel missense mutations (p.R1652L and p.K1370E). These mutations were predicted to have functional impacts on RP1 and are likely to be pathogenic. In light of these findings along with the findings of our previous studies, both RP1 truncation and missense mutations may contribute to the etiology of RP, accounting for approximately 2.18% of RP cases in our Chinese cohort, similar to other populations. Nevertheless, the Chinese population has a disproportionally high frequency of missense mutations, providing further insights into the ethnic diversity of the genetic epidemiology of RP.
The work in this paper was supported in part by a block grant of the University Grants Committee Hong Kong and the Endowment Fund for Lim Por-Yen Eye Genetics Research Centre, Hong Kong. We also express our greatest appreciation to all the participants in the study.