Molecular Vision 2025; 31:221-229 <http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v31/221>
Received 24 December 2024 | Accepted 06 September 2025 | Published 08 September 2025

Phenotype-genotype correlation of patients with congenital cataracts and hair anomalies

Qiwei Wang,1 Xiaoshan Lin,1 Dongni Wang,1 Tingfeng Qin,1 Wan Chen,1 Jingjing Chen,1 Xulin Zhang,1 Yongbin Lin,1 Zhuoling Lin,1 Jing Li,1 Xiaoyan Li,1 J. Fielding Hejtmancik,2 Weirong Chen1

The last two authors contributed equally to this work.

1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangdong Province, China; 2Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, Rockville, MD

Correspondence to: Weirong Chen, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Xianlie South Road #54, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China; email: chenwrq@aliyun.com and Fielding Hejtmancik email: hejtmancikj@nei.nih.gov

Abstract

Purpose: Hair anomalies represent a common associated symptom of congenital cataracts. Early diagnosis is crucial for treatment and predicting prognosis. However, the insidious and nonspecific nature of the symptoms in young children makes diagnosis challenging, often necessitating tools such as whole-exome sequencing (WES) for accurate assessment. This study aims to propose a simple and expedient approach to guide clinical management by analyzing phenotype-genotype correlations.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among participants who underwent clinical examinations and WES between 2021 and 2023. Bioinformatic analysis was performed. In total, 170 unrelated congenital cataract probands were tested. The suspected pathogenic variants were validated through Sanger sequencing in both the probands and available family members. Correlation analyses were then performed, integrating clinical characteristics, cataract phenotype, and genotype data.

Results: Nine probands presented with both cataracts and hair anomalies. Potential pathogenic variants were detected in all patients with hair anomalies, including a novel variant in LSS. Phenotype-genotype analysis supports the classification of patients into two groups: hypotrichosis 14 and ichthyosis follicularis with atrichia and photophobia syndrome 2, based on the cataract phenotype, severity of the hair anomalies, and the presence of corneal pannus. These patients should be monitored closely for the development and progression of glaucoma and corneal lesions.

Conclusions: We identified nine probands with hair anomalies in our large cohort of congenital cataract probands. Using WES and comprehensive clinical examinations, we established definitive diagnoses, broadened the phenotype and genotype, and proposed phenotype-genotype correlations.

Introduction

Congenital cataract is a pathological condition in children characterized by opacity or a color alteration of the crystalline lens, leading to a deterioration of optical quality [1,2]. It constitutes a large component of blinding diseases in the pediatric population [3]. The incidence of congenital cataract ranges from 12 to 136 per 100,000 births, with a substantial proportion attributable to genetic variants [4]. A discernible phenotype-genotype correlation exists in congenital cataracts, where the timing, location, and symmetry of lens opacities provide valuable clues to specific causative genes [5]. The co-occurrence of other ocular and systemic anomalies also can guide diagnostic procedures [6,7].

A significant fraction of patients with congenital cataracts present with co-occurring systemic anomalies [8,9]. In a large Danish series of genetic congenital cataracts, approximately 7% had associated ocular abnormalities, 3% had concomitant systemic abnormalities, and another 20% occurred as part of metabolic or chromosomal syndromes [10]. Among the extraocular findings, hair anomalies are common and easily detectable. Currently reported syndromes associated with congenital cataracts and hair anomalies include hypotrichosis 14 (OMIM 618275) [11]; cataract, alopecia, oral mucosal disorder, and psoriasis-like syndrome [12]; ichthyosis follicularis with atrichia and photophobia syndrome 2 (OMIM 619016) [13]; Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, type 1 (OMIM 618625) [14]; trichothiodystrophy 1, photosensitive (OMIM 601675) [15]; and uncombable hair syndrome 2 (OMIM 617251) [16]. However, differentiating among these patient groups poses a challenge, as in early childhood, they manifest only hair and eye anomalies, with other systemic anomalies not being evident. Genetic testing, due to its time-consuming and high-cost nature, has not been widely adopted. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of these patients in their early years need refinement. By conducting detailed examinations of systemic and ocular conditions, along with whole-exome sequencing (WES), this study aims to establish a phenotype-genotype correlation for congenital cataracts associated with hair disorders. This correlation enables the genotype prediction through an analysis of cataract type, thereby guiding clinical practice.

In our cohort, variants in the LSS and SREBF1 genes are associated with syndromes involving congenital cataracts and hair anomalies. By observing the deep phenotypes of cataracts, associated ocular anomalies, and the characteristics of the hair anomalies, a definitive diagnosis can be established, even in young patients. In addition to broadening the phenotypic spectrum of LSS and SREBF1 genes, we suggest that vigilant attention is essential for detecting glaucoma and corneal erosion in this patient group to prevent visual impairment.

Methods

Participants

The present prospective study constitutes a part of an ongoing series at the Childhood Cataract Program of the Chinese Ministry of Health, China [17]. The research has been registered with ClinicalTrials (NCT05782452). The research protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the participants, consistent with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The cohort comprises 170 bilateral congenital cataract probands who were enrolled consecutively and received WES between January 2021 and June 2023.

Clinical assessments

Clinical data of the probands and their parents were collected from photographs and medical charts. This encompassed basic information, family history, and comprehensive pre- and postoperative ophthalmic and general examination findings. Photographs of the patients were taken at the time of enrollment. Pre- and postoperative anterior eye segment photographs were captured using slit-lamp photography (BX900; HAAG-STREIT AG, Bern, Switzerland) under diffuse, direct focal, and retro illumination. The cataract phenotypes were defined according to our previous reports [7]. Thorough ocular examinations, including the Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), A-scan ultrasound and B-scan ultrasound (Aviso, Quantel Médical, Clermont-Ferrand, France), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM; SW-3200L; Tianjin Suowei Electronic Technology, Tianjin, China), optical coherence tomography (CIRRUS HD-OCT 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), and Tono-Pen (Reichert, Depew, NY), were conducted to screen the anterior and posterior segment disorders.

Whole-exome sequencing

WES was performed on genomic DNA from 170 patients with congenital cataracts enrolled in the study. The WES procedure and bioinformatic analysis were described in detail in our previous study [7,18]. Briefly, the Agilent v6 targeted sequence capture library process method (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was employed, coupled with a next-generation sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Variants were aligned against the human reference genome assembly (GRCh37/hg19), and the Genome Analysis Toolkit (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used for variant identification. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor and AnnoVar were employed for variant assessment and annotation. Public databases, including the 1000 Genomes Project, ExAC, gnomAD, and ESP6500, were referenced for allele population frequencies. To identify potentially pathogenic variants, we compared them with HGMD, ClinVar, PanelApp (Structural Eye Disease v1.3), and the Cat-Map database (last updated in April 2024). Various prediction tools, including REVEL, SIFT, PolyPhen, InterVar, ClinPred, CADD, and GERP++, were employed to assess the effects of variants on protein function. The classification of variants followed the variant classification guidelines set by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology [19-21].

Correlation analysis on genotype and phenotype data

The phenotype-genotype correlation was analyzed based on the extracted phenotype and genotype data. This included ocular characteristics, hair anomalies, eyebrow and eyelash anomalies, and the causative genes.

Results

We conducted WES on 170 congenital cataract probands and identified potential pathogenic variants in 71.2% (121 patients, data not shown). Among them, 51.8% were male, and 48.2% were female. The median age of the enrolled patients was 56 months (range, 2-168 months). Nine patients with hair anomalies carried candidate pathogenic variants in either LSS or SREBF1, which were absent in patients without hair anomalies (Figure 1, Appendix 1). Specifically, seven probands and one affected family member carried compound heterozygous variants in LSS, and two probands and one affected family member carried heterozygous variants in SREBF1 (Figure 2, and Appendix 2). Eight different variants in the LSS gene were identified, including a novel truncation variant (c.1306C>T p.Gln436Ter), six variants previously reported by our group [7], and one known missense variant (c.1025T>G). The LSS c.1025T>G variant was identified as a recurrent variant, while the remaining seven variants were found exclusively in our cohort [7]. One pathogenic variant in the SREBF1 gene was identified in two unrelated probands. Screening of their family members revealed that the SREBF1 variant in family 8 was inherited from the affected father, while the variant in family 9 was a de novo variant. All the identified variants in the LSS and SREBF1 genes occurred in evolutionary regions conserved in mammals through Xenopus and zebrafish (Figure 3). The clinical characteristics of the 11 patients with hair anomalies are listed in Appendix 1. We observed variations in the severity of abnormal hair conditions among the probands: six patients have completely absent hair, while the remainder have sparse and brittle hair. The six patients with alopecia also lack eyelashes and eyebrows. Additionally, patient F9 II:1 has ichthyosis and congenital glaucoma, and affected individuals in family 8 also have disordered teeth. All 11 patients have bilateral cataracts, with 8 presenting with bilateral nuclear cataracts and 3 presenting with bilateral cortical cataracts (the types of cataracts in patients F1 II:1, F2 II:1, F6 II:1, and F7 II:1 were confirmed from their medical records before surgery). Three patients have corneal pannus, two patients have glaucoma, and two patients presented with genitourinary system anomalies. Notably, no intellectual disability or developmental delay was observed in any of the affected individuals.

We examined the phenotype-genotype correlations for all probands and their affected family members, including combined hair anomalies, congenital cataract morphology, and other ocular findings (Figure 4). We found that all patients with nuclear cataracts carry variants in the LSS gene, while those with cortical cataracts carry variants in the SREBF1 gene. Furthermore, patients with complete alopecia and without eyebrows and eyelashes carry variants in the LSS gene. Among patients with brittle hair, normal eyebrows, and normal eyelashes, two carry LSS variants, while three carry SREBF1 variants. Additionally, we observed that all three patients carrying SREBF1 variants also have corneal pannus, while none of the patients with LSS variants do. Glaucoma was diagnosed in two patients: one with LSS compound heterozygous variants presenting as secondary glaucoma in the right eye and another with an SREBF1 variant presenting as bilateral congenital glaucoma.

Illustrative case 1-- Patient F9 II:1 (heterozygous variant of SREBF1 c.1669C>T Arg557Cys NM_001005291.3) first visited our clinic at the age of 4 years due to blurred vision in both eyes. A corneal epithelial defect was observed, with corneal pannus and cortical lens opacities in both eyes (Figure 5A-D), The cup-to-disc ratio was 0.5 in the right eye and 0.8 in the left eye. The white-to-white measurement for both eyes was 12 mm, with an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 28 mm Hg in the right eye and 26 mm Hg in the left eye. B-scan ultrasound indicated bilateral large cups. The diagnosis of bilateral congenital glaucoma, congenital cataracts, corneal erosions, and vascularizing keratitis was made. The patient also presented with sparse hair, recurrent oral ulcers, dystrophic nails, and rough skin, with normal eyebrows and eyelashes. She was previously diagnosed with suspected ichthyosis. Skin histopathology revealed dilated hair follicles with keratin plugs. Currently, her skin shows no apparent anomalies. Despite treatment with IOP-lowering medications, her glaucoma progressed and could not be controlled. Subsequently, bilateral trabeculectomy and iridotomy were performed. Two years after surgery, due to inadequate control of right eye glaucoma, the patient underwent cyclophotocoagulation of the right eye. Currently, the 9-year-old patient has her glaucoma under control, with no significant progression of cataracts observed during regular follow-up visits.

Illustrative case 2-- Patient F7 II:1 (compound heterozygous variants of LSS c.1306C>T Gln436Ter and c.1025T>G Ile342Ser NM_002340.6) presented in our clinic at 3 months of age with whitish pupils, which were noticed by her parents at birth. During the examination, nuclear opacities of the lens were observed in both eyes. The IOP was 16 mm Hg in the right eye and 15 mm Hg in the left eye, and the axial length (ALs) were 18.59 mm in the right eye and 18.61 mm in the left eye. Congenital cataracts were diagnosed. Alopecia and the absence of eyebrows and eyelashes had been present since infancy. Subsequently, bilateral cataract extraction was performed, along with posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy. Two years after surgery, an increase in IOP in the right eye was noted, with a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7 in the right eye and 0.3 in the left eye. The IOP was 29.5 mm Hg in the right eye and 11.5 mm Hg in the left eye, and ALs were 24.82 in the right eye and 21.45 mm in the left eye. B-scan ultrasound indicated a large cup in the right eye (Figure 5E, F), and UBM revealed angle closure in the right eye (Figure 5G, H). The diagnosis of secondary glaucoma in the right eye was made. Despite treatment with IOP-lowering medications, glaucoma progression remained uncontrolled, leading to the implantation of a drainage device in the right eye at the age of 2 years. Currently, the patient, aged 4 years and 7 months, has her glaucoma under control, with ongoing regular follow-ups.

Discussion

We conducted comprehensive clinical examinations and WES analysis for 170 probands with congenital cataracts and identified potential pathogenic variants in 71.2% of patients. Among them, nine patients had concurrent hair anomalies, and candidate pathogenic variants were identified in either LSS or SREBF1, including a novel variant in LSS. The establishment of phenotype-genotype correlations makes it possible to predict genotypes based on phenotypes.

The diagnostic yield in this study (121/170, 71.2%) is higher than that in previous size-comparable studies [22,23]. This difference can be attributed to several factors related to our study design and patient selection [2,7]. First, our study exclusively enrolled patients with bilateral congenital cataracts. This specific patient group is more likely to have a genetic etiology, as opposed to unilateral or acquired cataracts, which may have a higher incidence of nongenetic causes. Second, a significant proportion (41.76%) of the patients in our cohort had a family history of congenital cataracts. The inclusion of familial cases increases the likelihood of identifying pathogenic variants, as these families are more prone to monogenic inheritance patterns. Additionally, our cohort had a relatively high median age of 56 months, which allowed for more comprehensive clinical assessments and accurate phenotyping, potentially aiding in the identification of associated genetic variants.

The establishment of phenotype-genotype correlations might contribute to diagnostic precision through the analysis of cataract deep phenotypes and extralenticular and extraocular signs, offering valuable guidance for clinical treatment. Previous studies have suggested phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity in congenital cataracts [22]. Therefore, genetic testing is often employed for disease diagnosis. However, the widespread adoption of this technology faces challenges due to its high cost, time-consuming nature, and interpretative complexities, particularly in some countries and regions [24]. Our previous study demonstrated that by objectively and meticulously assessing lens, ocular, and extraocular findings, correlations could be established between specific genes and their deep phenotypes [7]. In the present cohort, all patients with nuclear cataracts exhibited variants in the LSS gene, while those with cortical cataracts presented variants in the SREBF1 gene. Furthermore, all three patients carrying SREBF1 variants had photophobia and corneal pannus, while patients carrying LSS variants did not, emphasizing the importance of protecting the cornea in the former group to mitigate the risk of severe complications and their consequences. In this study, all patients with alopecia and absent eyebrows and eyelashes carried variants in the LSS gene, while all children with SREBF1 gene variants presented with sparse hair, although some patients with LSS variants presented similarly, so this finding alone cannot discriminate between the two groups. Based on these findings, we propose categorizing patients with nuclear cataracts, alopecia, and absent eyebrows and eyelashes as having hypotrichosis 14 due to LSS gene variants, while cortical cataracts and corneal vascularization are indicative of ichthyosis follicularis with atrichia and photophobia syndrome 2 caused by SREBF1 gene variants.

Previous studies have suggested a tentative genotype-phenotype correlation for LSS variants, with variants occurring within the N-terminus associated with hair loss and variants toward the C-terminus linked to ocular abnormalities [11]. However, our study found that all patients with LSS gene variants exhibited both cataracts and alopecia, and their variants were not confined to the N-terminus or C-terminus. Additionally, other studies analyzing previously reported LSS patients found that there was no absolute correlation between LSS variants and phenotypes [25,26]. This underscores the complexity of genotype-phenotype correlations in LSS-related disorders and highlights the need for further research to better understand these relationships.

This study broadens the phenotypic spectrum of LSS and SREBF1 genes. Glaucoma, not previously reported in congenital cataracts linked with hair anomalies, occurred in 18.2% of the cases (2/11) in this cohort. One patient developed secondary glaucoma following cataract surgery, a condition that may be attributable to either the surgical intervention or underlying genetic factors. In contrast, another patient with an SREBF1 gene variant developed glaucoma without undergoing cataract surgery, highlighting the potential role of genetic predisposition in glaucoma development within this patient group. Given the serious threat childhood glaucoma poses to vision, characterized by insidious visual impairment and unclear pathogenesis [27], it is crucial to maintain vigilant monitoring for this condition in high-risk patients. This applies to both preoperative assessments and postoperative follow-ups, as early detection can help prevent avoidable visual impairment and ensure timely intervention.

Multiple genes have been reported to be associated with cataracts and hair anomalies in various sterol and cholesterol metabolic pathways [11,13,28]. Among them, the membrane-bound transcription factor protease, site 1 (MBTPS1) and the membrane-bound transcription factor protease, site 2 (MBTPS2) genes encode site 1 protease and site 2 protease, respectively. They collaborate in cholesterol biosynthesis by cleaving sterol regulatory element–binding proteins (SREBPs) and site 1 protease itself [12]. SREBPs, encoded by SREBF1 and SREBF2, are transcription factors that bind to the specific sequence sterol regulatory element in the promoter regions of lipogenes, thereby regulating the biosynthesis of cholesterol and fatty acids [13]. Another gene involved in the cholesterol pathway is LSS (OMIM 600909), which encodes lanosterol synthase, catalyzing the conversion of (S)-2,3-oxidosqualene to lanosterol, thereby participating in the biosynthesis of cholesterol [11,29]. The correlation among these genes in the cholesterol metabolic pathway may elucidate the shared clinical spectrum observed in these syndromes.

This study has some limitations. Specifically, functional analyses of the identified variants were not performed in this study, and the cohort size was limited. Future research should continue to refine the phenotypic and genotypic correlation studies of the LSS and SREBF1 genes and further enhance our understanding of these complex diseases.

Conclusion

In our large cohort of probands with congenital cataracts, we identified nine probands with hair anomalies and expanded the phenotypes and genotypes for these disorders. Using standardized WES and comprehensive clinical examinations, we established genotype-phenotype correlations. These correlations allowed for definitive clinical diagnosis and the prediction of genotype through phenotype analysis.

Appendix 1. Clinical and genetic information of the affected patients at the time of inclusion.

Appendix 2. Sanger validation.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the patients and their families for their kind participation in the study. Disclosures: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Funding: This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFC2008200); the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515012102); National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 81700812.

References

  1. Hejtmancik JF. Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008; 19:134-49. [PMID: 18035564]
  2. Gillespie RL, O’Sullivan J, Ashworth J, Bhaskar S, Williams S, Biswas S, Kehdi E, Ramsden SC, Clayton-Smith J, Black GC, Lloyd IC. Personalized diagnosis and management of congenital cataract by next-generation sequencing. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121:2124-37.e1.-, 2. [PMID: 25148791]
  3. Solebo AL, Teoh L, Rahi J. Epidemiology of blindness in children. Arch Dis Child. 2017; 102:853-7. [PMID: 28465303]
  4. Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Biology of Inherited Cataracts and Opportunities for Treatment. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2019; 5:123-49. [PMID: 31525139]
  5. Shoshany N, Hejtmancik JF, Shiels A, Datiles M. Congenital and Hereditary Cataracts: Epidemiology and Genetics. In: Kraus CL (ed). Pediatric Cataract Surgery and IOL Implantation. Springer: New York; 2020. pp 3–24.
  6. Wang Q, Qin T, Tan H, Ding X, Lin X, Li J, Lin Z, Sun L, Lin H, Chen W. Broadening the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of MAF in three Chinese Han congenital cataracts families. Am J Med Genet A. 2022; 188:2888-98. [PMID: 36097645]
  7. Wang Q, Wang D, Qin T, Zhang X, Lin X, Chen J, Chen W, Zhao L, Huang W, Lin Z, Li J, Dongye M, Wu X, Wang X, Li X, Lin Y, Tan H, Liu Y, Lin H, Chen W. Early Diagnosis of Syndromic Congenital Cataracts in a Large Cohort of Congenital Cataracts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024; 263:206-13. [PMID: 38184101]
  8. Ang MJ, Afshari NA. Cataract and systemic disease: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021; 49:118-27. [PMID: 33426783]
  9. Ma AS, Grigg JR, Ho G, Prokudin I, Farnsworth E, Holman K, Cheng A, Billson FA, Martin F, Fraser C, Mowat D, Smith J, Christodoulou J, Flaherty M, Bennetts B, Jamieson RV. Sporadic and Familial Congenital Cataracts: Mutational Spectrum and New Diagnoses Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2016; 37:371-84. [PMID: 26694549]
  10. Haargaard B, Wohlfahrt J, Fledelius HC, Rosenberg T, Melbye M. A nationwide Danish study of 1027 cases of congenital/infantile cataracts: etiological and clinical classifications. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:2292-8. [PMID: 15582089]
  11. Romano MT, Tafazzoli A, Mattern M, Sivalingam S, Wolf S, Rupp A, Thiele H, Altmüller J, Nürnberg P, Ellwanger J, Gambon R, Baumer A, Kohlschmidt N, Metze D, Holdenrieder S, Paus R, Lütjohann D, Frank J, Geyer M, Bertolini M, Kokordelis P, Betz RC. Bi-allelic Mutations in LSS, Encoding Lanosterol Synthase, Cause Autosomal-Recessive Hypotrichosis Simplex. Am J Hum Genet. 2018; 103:777-85. [PMID: 30401459]
  12. Chen F, Ni C, Wang X, Cheng R, Pan C, Wang Y, Liang J, Zhang J, Cheng J, Chin YE, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Guo Y, Chen S, Htun S, Mathes EF, de Alba Campomanes AG, Slavotinek AM, Zhang S, Li M, Yao Z. S1P defects cause a new entity of cataract, alopecia, oral mucosal disorder, and psoriasis-like syndrome. EMBO Mol Med. 2022; 14e14904 [PMID: 35362222]
  13. Wang H, Humbatova A, Liu Y, Qin W, Lee M, Cesarato N, Kortüm F, Kumar S, Romano MT, Dai S, Mo R, Sivalingam S, Motameny S, Wu Y, Wang X, Niu X, Geng S, Bornholdt D, Kroisel PM, Tadini G, Walter SD, Hauck F, Girisha KM, Calza AM, Bottani A, Altmüller J, Buness A, Yang S, Sun X, Ma L, Kutsche K, Grzeschik KH, Betz RC, Lin Z. Mutations in SREBF1, Encoding Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Transcription Factor 1, Cause Autosomal-Dominant IFAP Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2020; 107:34-45. [PMID: 32497488]
  14. Ajeawung NF, Nguyen TTM, Lu L, Kucharski TJ, Rousseau J, Molidperee S, Atienza J, Gamache I, Jin W, Plon SE, Lee BH, Teodoro JG, Wang LL, Campeau PM. Mutations in ANAPC1, Encoding a Scaffold Subunit of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex, Cause Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Type 1. Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 105:625-30. [PMID: 31303264]
  15. Faghri S, Tamura D, Kraemer KH, Digiovanna JJ. Trichothiodystrophy: a systematic review of 112 published cases characterises a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. J Med Genet. 2008; 45:609-21. [PMID: 18603627]
  16. FB ÜB. Cau L, Tafazzoli A, Méchin MC, Wolf S, Romano MT, Valentin F, Wiegmann H, Huchenq A, Kandil R, Garcia Bartels N, Kilic A, George S, Ralser DJ, Bergner S, Ferguson DJP, Oprisoreanu AM, Wehner M, Thiele H, Altmüller J, Nürnberg P, Swan D, Houniet D, Büchner A, Weibel L, Wagner N, Grimalt R, Bygum A, Serre G, Blume-Peytavi U, Sprecher E, Schoch S, Oji V, Hamm H, Farrant P, Simon M, Betz RC. Mutations in Three Genes Encoding Proteins Involved in Hair Shaft Formation Cause Uncombable Hair Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2016; 99:1292-304.
  17. Lin H, Long E, Chen W, Liu Y. Documenting rare disease data in China. Science. 2015; 349:1064 [PMID: 26339020]
  18. Wang Q, Qin T, Wang X, Li J, Lin X, Wang D, Lin Z, Zhang X, Li X, Lin H, Chen W. Whole-Exome Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis in a Patient with Warburg Micro Syndrome. Genes (Basel). 2022; 13:2364 [PMID: 36553631]
  19. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, Flicek P, Cunningham F. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016; 17:122 [PMID: 27268795]
  20. Zhou P, He N, Zhang JW, Lin ZJ, Wang J, Yan LM, Meng H, Tang B, Li BM, Liu XR, Shi YW, Zhai QX, Yi YH, Liao WP. Novel mutations and phenotypes of epilepsy-associated genes in epileptic encephalopathies. Genes Brain Behav. 2018; 17e12456 [PMID: 29314583]
  21. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20:1297-303. [PMID: 20644199]
  22. Rechsteiner D, Issler L, Koller S, Lang E, Bähr L, Feil S, Rüegger CM, Kottke R, Toelle SP, Zweifel N, Steindl K, Joset P, Zweier M, Suter AA, Gogoll L, Haas C, Berger W, Gerth-Kahlert C. Genetic Analysis in a Swiss Cohort of Bilateral Congenital Cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021; 139:691-700. [PMID: 34014271]
  23. Lecca M, Mauri L, Gana S, Del Longo A, Morelli F, Nicotra R, Plumari M, Galli J, Sirchia F, Valente EM, Cavallari U, Mazza M, Signorini S, Errichiello E. Novel molecular, structural and clinical findings in an Italian cohort of congenital cataract. Clin Genet. 2024; 106:403-12. [PMID: 38840272]
  24. Reuter CM, Kohler JN, Bonner D, Zastrow D, Fernandez L, Dries A, Marwaha S, Davidson J, Brokamp E, Herzog M, Hong J, Macnamara E, Rosenfeld JA, Schoch K, Spillmann R, Loscalzo J, Krier J, Stoler J, Sweetser D, Palmer CGS, Phillips JA, Shashi V, Adams DA, Yang Y, Ashley EA, Fisher PG, Mulvihill JJ, Bernstein JA, Wheeler MT, Undiagnosed Diseases Network. Yield of whole exome sequencing in undiagnosed patients facing insurance coverage barriers to genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2019; 28:1107-18. [PMID: 31478310]
  25. Guo D, Zhang Q. A case of LSS-associated congenital nuclear cataract with hypotrichosis and literature review. Am J Med Genet A. 2023; 191:2398-401. [PMID: 37455568]
  26. Tan Y, Tian H, Mai J, Wang H, Yang M, Liu S. A case of congenital cataracts with hypotrichosis caused by compound heterozygous variants in the LSS gene. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024; 12e2320 [PMID: 37947113]
  27. Wang J, Wu X, Wang Q, Zhou F, Chen H, Chen W, Lin D, Zhang X, Wang R, Chen J, Liu Z, Lin Z, Li X, Li J, Han Y, Liu Y, Lin H, Chen W. Incidence of and risk factors for suspected and definitive glaucoma after bilateral congenital cataract surgery: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024; 108:476-83. [PMID: 36828619]
  28. Carvalho DR, Speck-Martins CE, Brum JM, Ferreira CR, Sobreira NLM. Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia with elevated plasma lysosomal enzymes caused by homozygous variant in MBTPS1. Am J Med Genet A. 2020; 182:1796-800. [PMID: 32420688]
  29. Zhao M, Mei T, Shang B, Zou B, Lian Q, Xu W, Wu K, Lai Y, Liu C, Wei L, Zhu J, Zhang K, Liu Y, Zhao L. Defect of LSS Disrupts Lens Development in Cataractogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9788422 [PMID: 34926465]