Figure 5 of Kinoshita, Mol Vis 2019; 25:890-901.


Figure 5. Longitudinal evaluation of ERG phenotype in adult Grm6nob8 mice. Comparison of dark- (A) and light-adapted (C) electroretinograms (ERGs) from young adult (4 weeks) and old (68 weeks) Grm6nob8 mice. Flash strength (in log cd s/m2) is indicated on the left of each set of waveforms. B: Amplitude of dark-adapted a- and b-waves plotted as a function of flash luminance. D: Amplitude of the light-adapted b-wave plotted as a function of flash luminance. In B and D, each plot indicates average +/− standard error of four to five mice. Time course change in the maximum response (Rmax, E) and sensitivity (K, F) parameters of the dark-adapted b-wave amplitude. When the Rmax and K values of 4-week old mice were compared to those of older mice, the differences were not statistically significant (Aspin-Welch’s t test, p>0.05).