Table 3 of Chen, Mol Vis 2015; 21:1272-1280.


Table 3. Results of leave-one-out sensitivity analysis.

Study excluded OR, 95% CI
G versus T* GG versus TT* GT versus TT* (GG+GT) versus TT* GG versus (GT+TT)*
Qiang, Y, 2004 0.85 (0.78–0.92) 0.74 (0.62–0.87) 0.77 (0.68–0.88) 0.76 (0.68–0.86) 0.87 (0.75–1.01)
Zhu, JY(a), 2014 0.85 (0.79–0.92) 0.73 (0.62–0.86) 0.81 (0.73–0.92) 0.79 (0.70–0.88) 0.83 (0.72–0.95)
Zhu, JY(b), 2014 0.83 (0.77–0.89) 0.69 (0.60–0.81) 0.79 (0.70–0.88) 0.76 (0.69–0.85) 0.80 (0.70–0.92)
Jiao, X(a), 2012 0.82 (0.76–0.89) 0.69 (0.59–0.81) 0.77 (0.69–0.87) 0.75 (0.67–0.84) 0.81 (0.71–0.94)
Jiao, X(b), 2012 0.83 (0.77–0.90) 0.70 (0.61–0.82) 0.79 (0.71–0.89) 0.77 (0.69–0.86) 0.81 (0.71–0.93)
Hayashi, H(a), 2011 0.82 (0.76–0.89) 0.68 (0.58–0.80) 0.80 (0.70–0.90) 0.76 (0.68–0.86) 0.78 (0.68–0.90)
Hayashi, H(b), 2011 0.82 (0.75–0.90) 0.69 (0.58–0.83) 0.75 (0.66–0.86) 0.74 (0.65–0.84) 0.83 (0.70–0.97)