Table 3 of
Tariq, Mol Vis 2013; 19:710-717. Table 3 of
Tariq, Mol Vis 2013; 19:710-717.
Table 3. Analysis of association of Pro12Ala polymorphism of PPARγ with NPDR and PDR.
| NPDR | NPDR versus Controls | NPDR versus DNR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n=90 | χ2 (p) | OR(95%CI) | χ2 (p) | OR(95%CI) | |
| Pro/Pro | 71(79%) | 0.92 | DM=0.92(0.5–1.69) | 3.93 | DM=0.77(0.40–1.45) |
| Pro/Ala | 19(21%) | (0.63) | (0.14) | ||
| Ala/Ala | 0 | ||||
| Pro | 161(89%) | 0.18 | 0.89(0.48–1.61) | 2.09 | 0.67(0.37–1.19) |
| Ala | 19(11%) | (0.68) | (0.15) | ||
| PDR | PDR versus Controls | PDR versus DNR | |||
| n=90 | |||||
| Pro/Pro | 78(86.7%) | 3.73 | DM=0.53(0.23–1.1) | 7.26 | DM=0.44(0.21–0.91) |
| Pro/Ala | 12(13.3%) | (0.15) | (0.03) | ||
| Ala/Ala | 0 | ||||
| Pro | 168(93%) | 3.51 | 0.54(0.26–1.08) | 7.91 | 0.4(0.2–0.8) |
| Ala | 12(7%) | (0.06) | (0.005) | ||
| PDR versus NPDR | |||||
| Pro/Pro | - | 1.91 | DM=0.57(0.24–1.4) | ||
| Pro/Ala | - | (0.17) | |||
| Ala/Ala | - | ||||
| Pro | - | 1.73 | 0.61(0.27–1.36) | ||
| Ala | - | (0.19) | |||