Table 4. Forest plot based on the GG versus AA group of the random-effect model with adjusted data.
Study |
OR |
[95% Conf. Interval] |
% Weight |
Asian |
Chen 2006 [20]
|
2.490 |
1.150 |
5.370 |
6.97 |
Fuse 2006 [21]
|
1.140 |
0.480 |
2.690 |
6.48 |
Goto 2009 [27]
|
7.050 |
3.070 |
16.200 |
6.64 |
Hayashi 2010 [28]
|
4.040 |
3.000 |
5.440 |
9.34 |
Kim 2008 [23]
|
3.957 |
1.835 |
8.535 |
6.98 |
Lee 2008 [24]
|
5.220 |
1.500 |
18.200 |
4.69 |
Liu 2010 [30]
|
1.620 |
0.920 |
2.850 |
8.08 |
Mori 2007 [22]
|
3.890 |
1.860 |
8.130 |
7.15 |
Tanaka 2011 [32]
|
2.470 |
1.790 |
3.410 |
9.25 |
Yang 2010 [31]
|
2.530 |
1.190 |
5.380 |
7.06 |
Sub-total |
D+L pooled OR |
2.945 |
2.187 |
3.965 |
72.64 |
Caucasian |
Bergeron 2009 [26]
|
3.700 |
1.600 |
8.300 |
6.69 |
Hageman 2005a [19]
|
6.480 |
1.750 |
23.930 |
4.46 |
Hageman 2005b [19]
|
3.840 |
1.970 |
7.460 |
7.54 |
Hecker 2010 [29]
|
24.610 |
1.430 |
424.130 |
1.46 |
Xing 2008 [25]
|
0.310 |
0.150 |
0.640 |
7.21 |
Sub-total |
D+L pooled OR |
2.947 |
0.774 |
11.226 |
27.36 |
Overall |
D+L pooled OR |
2.788 |
1.922 |
4.046 |
100.00 |