Molecular Vision 2013; 19:1985-1998 <http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v19/1985>
Received 02 May 2013 | Accepted 18 September 2013 | Published 20 September 2013

This Article

Download PDF

Citation (for Endnote)

Google Scholar

Articles by the Authors

Review: Retinal degeneration: Focus on the unfolded protein response

Marina Gorbatyuk,1 Oleg Gorbatyuk2

1Department of Vision Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233,; 2Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610

Correspondence to: Marina Gorbatyuk, Department of Vision Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233; Phone: (205) 934-6762; FAX: (205) 934-3425; email: mgortk@uab.edu.

Abstract

Purpose: Recently published literature has provided evidence that the unfolded protein response (UPR) is involved in the development of retinal degeneration.

Methods: The scope of these studies encompassed diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, glaucoma, retinal detachment, light-induced retinal degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, and inherited retinal degeneration.

Results: Subsequent studies investigating the role of individual UPR markers in retinal pathogenesis and examining the therapeutic potential of reprogramming the UPR as a method for modulating the rate of retinal degeneration have been initiated. Manipulation of UPR markers has been made possible by the use of knockout mice, pharmacological agents, and viral vector-mediated augmentation of gene expression.

Conclusions: Future research will aim at identifying specific inhibitors and/or inducers of UPR regulatory markers as well as expand the list of UPR-related animal models. Additionally, adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery is a safe and effective method for modulating gene expression, and thus is a useful research tool for manipulating individual UPR markers in affected retinas and a promising delivery vector for gene therapy in retinal degenerative disorders.

Retinal degeneration is progressive deterioration of the retinal cells, eventually culminating in their death. Certain conditions can lead to an imbalance in the retinal microenviroment, which in turn could cause retinal degeneration. These conditions include but are not limited to artery or vein occlusion in diabetic retinopathy, hypoxic retina in retinopathy of prematurity, aging in age-related macular degeneration, expression of mutant proteins in inherited retinal degeneration, traumatic injury leading to retinal detachment, and light sensitivity in the case of light-induced retinal degeneration. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the mechanism of these retinopathies, much work remains to get a clear picture of the molecular pathology of each disease. The understanding of the underlying mechanisms is complicated by the heterogeneity of cases within a particular retinopathy and by the interplay of multiple cellular signaling involved in each disease model.

The unfolded protein response (UPR) or the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response is a series of evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways aimed at restoring homeostasis under conditions of ER stress [1]. ER homeostasis can be compromised by various stimuli, including disturbances in redox regulation [2], calcium regulation [3,4], glucose deprivation [5,6], and viral infection [7,8]. During ER stress, the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER lumen activates pancreatic ER kinase (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK) [9,10], inositol-requiring kinase/endoRNase 1 (IRE1) [11], and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) [12] proteins and initiates the three associated UPR signaling pathways (Table 1, Figure 1A). The molecular chaperone glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) or binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), in addition to Ca2+ binding and protein processing functions, possesses one more key role: master initiator of early UPR signaling. In resting conditions, GRP78 is bound to these mediators. The association of GRP78 with the ER luminal domains of these mediators prevents their activation and maintains the UPR signaling machinery in an inactive state [11]. Accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER lumen triggers the dissociation of GRP78 from its quiescent UPR mediators. This dissociation from PERK, ATF6, and IRE1 satisfies the demand for appropriate protein folding. The free and active PERK, ATF6, and IRE1 then orchestrate a series of transformations known cumulatively as the UPR [13].

Increased expression of GRP78 may serve as an indicator of UPR activation [14,15]. However, once the need for the chaperone activity of GRP78 is satisfied, it gradually reassociates with PERK, IRE1, and ATF6, thus inactivating these signaling mediators, resolving the UPR signaling, and reestablishing homeostasis.

ER stress leads to the upregulation of PERK. The initial phase of UPR activation consists of translational attenuation and cell cycle arrest mediated by PERK. Dissociation of BiP from PERK initiates dimerization and autophosphorylation of the PERK kinase domain [16]. Activated PERK reduces global protein production by inducing the phosphorylation (p) of eukaryotic transcription factor 2α (eIF2α) [17]. Phosphorylation of eIF2α at Ser 51 interferes with the formation of an active 43S translation-inhibition complex and suppresses the translation [18]. At the same time, peIF2α allows translation of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) with short open reading frames in their 5′-untranslated regions, including activating transcriptional factor 4 (ATF4) [19]. ATF4 in turn controls the expression of important genes involved in apoptosis such as C/EBP-homologous protein (CHOP) and growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible 34 (GADD34) [19] (Table 1). The latter participates in a feedback loop that controls phosphorylation of eIF2α and, thus, participates in restoring protein synthesis [19].

ATF6 is best known as the cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element (CRE)/ATF transcriptional factor that regulates expression of multiple genes associated with the UPR [20]. This 90-kDa protein has a basic leucine zipper domain (bZip) for DNA binding post homo- or heterodimerization. ATF6 binds to the ER stress response elements (ERSEs), UPR element (UPRE), and ERSE-II in a promoter [21] to transmit stress signals directly from the ER to the nucleus [20]. Under ER stress conditions, ATF6 dissociates from BiP and is transported on vesicles toward the Golgi apparatus, where ATF6 undergoes processing by first the site-1 and then the site-2 proteases. The N-terminal fragment of pATF6 (cleaved form) translocates to the nucleus and promotes transcription of UPR genes, such as BiP and the transcriptional factors CHOP and X-box binding protein 1, also known as XBP1. It also promotes transcription of other proteins such as p58IPK, best known as an inhibitor of the eIF2α protein kinases PKR and PERK [22], and sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) [20].

IRE1 represents the most highly conserved branch of the UPR. IRE1’s C-terminal cytosolic effector region manifests kinase and endoRNase activity [1]. IRE1 senses unfolded proteins in the ER lumen by activating the cytoplasmic kinase and endoRNase domains [23]. The activation of IRE1 is accompanied by oligomerization and autophosphorylation within the cytosolic effector region [20]. Under ER stress conditions, IRE1 catalyzes unconventional splicing of Xbp1 mRNA, which generates a protein that differs from its unspliced variant (uXbp1). Xbp1 is a potent transactivator that regulates genes involved in ER protein synthesis, folding, glycosylation, ER-associated degradation, redox metabolism, autophagy, and vesicular trafficking [1]. IRE1 also activates c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) by recruiting the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) [24,25] in the presence of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAP3K), apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), and ASK1-interacting protein-1 (AIPI-1). This activation is associated with cell death [20,26]. IRE1 signaling is attenuated after prolonged ER stress. This process is characterized by IRE1 dephosphorylation and a decrease in endoRNase activity [20].

The primary goal of the UPR is to reestablish homeostasis while maintaining a prosurvival signaling environment. However, if the ER capacity to deal with persistent stress is insufficient, the UPR-associated signaling shifts from a prosurvival to a proapoptotic cascade that eventually becomes dominant and leads to cell death. This shift can result in the accumulation of proapoptotic CHOP and IRE-regulated JNK apoptosis [27,28]. This dual nature of UPR-associated signaling has in fact been likened to the “yin” and “yang” with the prosurvival GRP78 (yang) and proapoptotic CHOP (yin) signaling comprising opposing components of the same larger cellular mechanism [13].

The unfolded protein response and retinal degenerative diseases

The ER stress response has been recently proposed as a contributing factor to retinal degenerative disease [29,30]. The fact that UPR activation can induce retinal cell death in mice has been previously reported [31]. Despite the physiologic responses from retinas treated with tunicamycin or N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) or retinas with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) that had not been assessed with electroretinogram (ERG), these authors clearly demonstrated that the activation of ER stress by itself could provoke retinal degeneration. In real-world conditions, activation of the ER stress response often occurs in retinas with other preexisting complications, and little is known about the cellular consequences of the UPR upon physiologic levels of ER stress in vivo [29].

For the past decade, our attention has been drawn to the role of the UPR in retinal degenerative diseases. The majority of the studies on retinal degenerative diseases identified the UPR as a common cellular pathway involved in retinal diseases but were unable to ascertain its exact role in the disease process. Although there have been valuable insights into the interplay of the UPR and retinal pathology, it remains unclear whether the UPR is directly responsible for causing retinal degeneration or alternately if UPR activation is in response to retinal cell death. This key question remains to be answered by future research. With that said, in this review we will summarize the active status of research regarding the UPR in retinal degenerative diseases and will highlight progress that has been recently made in our understanding of UPR’s precise role.

Diabetic retinopathy

Recently, the Eye Disease Prevalence Research Group reported that “one in every 12 individuals with diabetes age 40 years and over has vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy.” This frightening number points to the importance of investigating the mechanism of diabetic retinopathy (DR), which remains unresolved. In the case of DR, the cellular signaling pathways leading to vision impairment and retinal neovascularization are of particular interest.

A study demonstrating UPR involvement in the cellular mechanism of DR was conducted in 2006 by Ikesugi et al. [32]. The authors demonstrated that glucose fluctuation, in particular hypoglycemia and not hyperglycemia, activated UPR-specific enzymes in pericytes, cells that participate in the proliferation of DR. These studies were conducted in cultured pericytes. However, subsequent work in diabetic Akita mouse [33] and rat retinas [34] demonstrated the activation of the ER stress response, suggesting that it may be one of the earlier events in DR progression.

Retinopathy of prematurity

A study conducted with the mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) demonstrated that GRP78 is significantly upregulated in the OIR retina at the RNA and protein levels. In addition, the expression of ATF4 and the amount of phosphorylated eIF2α were also significantly upregulated suggesting that ER stress is enhanced in the OIR retina [33]. Recently, Nakamura et al. [35] also established a link between ER stress and the pathological neovascularization in the DR retina and demonstrated that the triggering of ER stress by injection of tunicamycin or thapsigargin in mouse OIR retinas accelerated retinal neovascularization. These data point to the UPR as a cellular signaling cascade that could be reprogrammed to reduce neovascularization and halt the proliferation of DR.

Glaucoma

Glaucoma is a term for a heterogeneous group of ocular neuropathies leading to gradual axonal degeneration in the optic nerve, progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells, visual impairment, and irreversible blindness. It has been estimated that 80 million people will be affected by this disease in 2020 worldwide [36]. Emerging evidence indicates that increased IOP, decreased neutrophine supply [37,38], hypoxia [39], excitotoxicity [40,41], oxidative stress [42], and autoimmune [43-45] processes all interact as pathogenic markers and may collectively be responsible for the development and progression of glaucoma.

Recently, transgenic mice expressing the mutant myocilin (MYOC) (Y437) mimicking human phenotypes seen in patients with primary angle glaucoma (POAG) have been developed [46]. These mice have been used to study the mechanism of POAG. The results have demonstrated that chronic and persistent ER stress is associated with trabecular meshwork cell death and elevation of IOP in Tg-MYOC(Y437H) mice. The authors proposed that ER stress in these mice is linked to the pathogenesis of POAG and may be a therapeutic target in human patients [46].

Retinal detachment

Retinal detachment (RD) is a common cause of human visual impairment and can be provoked by microenvironmental events such as the presence of one or more small holes or tears in the retina or traumatic injury, such as that sustained in an accident or in combat. This disorder is characterized by the peeling of the retina away from its underlying layer of support tissue. This separates the retina from the back of the eye and causes the retina to detach. The detached portion of the retina does not function properly resulting in a blur or a blind spot in the visual field. Progression of retinal detachment results in an increasing blurring and loss of the visual field with significant or total loss of vision likely unless the detachment is repaired.

A study conducted with a rat model of retinal detachment demonstrated that GRP78 and CHOP/GADD153 mRNA and protein levels were elevated in retinas in a time-dependent manner [47]. Elevated expression of GRP78 was observed in all layers of the retina in rats with retinal detachment while expression of the CHOP was most prominent in photoreceptors. The authors therefore concluded that the ER stress-related markers were upregulated in response to retinal detachment.

Another study conducted in the rat model of RD also confirmed previous results by detecting the proapoptotic CHOP mRNA and protein levels as they were upregulated from day 1 to day 7 post-detachment [48]. These studies also suggested that ER stress–mediated apoptosis is involved in retinal detachment-induced photoreceptor cell death.

Light-induced retinal degeneration

The role of ER stress in light-induced retinal degeneration has recently been verified. In 2008, Yang et al. [49] found that after light exposure, the ER stress markers GRP78/BiP, caspase-12, peIF2 alpha, and PERK were significantly upregulated in a time-dependent manner. Interestingly, the authors observed that the upregulation of these proteins coincided with apoptosis of the photoreceptors. Based on these observations, the authors proposed that ER stress plays an important role in light-induced photoreceptor apoptosis and that, consequently, ER stress modulators could be strong therapeutic candidates for treating retinal degeneration. We have also demonstrated that BiP and CHOP expression is elevated in the retina of BALB/c mice exposed to constant light and peaks at 4 h after light exposure [50]. Furthermore, a study of 661W cells, a mouse retinal photoreceptor-derived cell line, exposed to light and mice with light-induced retinal degeneration demonstrated that light exposure induces upregulation of polyubiquitinated proteins, S-opsin aggregation, and an increase in BiP and CHOP mRNA levels and cell death [51]. This study used 661W cells as an effective in vitro model for the photoreceptor cell response to visible light since these cultured cells demonstrate light-induced cell death in a manner similar to that observed in vivo [52,53]. Given these findings and our own observations, we believe that the manipulation of ER stress markers may also be helpful in treating this environmental form of retinal degeneration.

Age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a multifactorial disease affecting an estimated 10 million Americans and 50 million people worldwide with several risk factors, including aging, genetic predisposition, smoking, obesity, and hypertension [54,55]. Recently, animal models of AMD, which manifest some of the features of the human disease, have become available [56]. However, due to the complexity and progressive characteristics of AMD, the majority of these models do not recapitulate the full spectrum of the human AMD pathology.

For example, ER stress could be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of AMD and, with oxidative stress, could trigger inflammation and disease [57]. However, another study suggested that in addition to oxidative stress, impaired phagocytosis, elevation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and exposure to light can provide ideal conditions for the development of retinal degeneration in the macular region. That said, in human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells, oxidative stress leads to inhibition of proteosomal activity and aggresomal accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins [58,59], thus suggesting that prolonged oxidative stress is in turn capable of activating the ER stress response.

Yoshikawa et al. aimed at determining how ER stress affects the expression of tight junction molecules in RPE cells [60]. To do this, they exposed cultured ARPE-19 cells, a human RPE cell line, with the ER stress inducers tunicamycin and thapsigargin. This study also revealed that induction of ER stress in ARPE-19 cells not only led to elevated gene expression from the UPR and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) but also provoked increased expression of tight junction proteins, thus altering the function of RPE cells. This alteration of protein expression and cellular function may be yet another way in which the ER stress response could be involved in the pathogenesis of AMD.

The proposed effects of light-induced damage of RPE and oxidative stress on AMD were recently tested in albino rats [61]. The levels of spliced Xbp1 and GRP78 increased in the retina but were remarkably suppressed in the RPE. This suppression correlated with an increase in the antioxidant genes nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2, superoxide dismutase 2, and nitrotyrosine 3, which are markers of oxidative stress. These findings suggested that the disruption of Xbp1 activation may be linked to decreased antioxidant gene expression and increased oxidative stress during light-induced damage in the RPE, thus leading to RPE pathogenesis.

Inherited retinal degeneration

Involvement of the UPR in the mechanism of inherited retinal degeneration has been studied in vitro and in vivo. In a study of inherited early-onset macular degenerative disease, ARPE-19 cells were used in investigating the mechanisms of malattia leventinese and Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy [62], which previously were thought to be linked to the R345W mutant of fibulin-3. That same study found that overexpression of R345W fibulin-3 caused activation of the UPR and increased VEGF expression when compared with overexpression of the wild-type protein. This suggested that the ER stress response leads to RPE dysfunction and contributes to the pathogenesis of these disorders.

Subsequent availability of animal and Drosophila models of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) has allowed scientists to extensively study the UPR in the degenerating retina. For example, in the Drosophila retina expressing the ninaEG69D protein, a homolog of mammalian opsin, leading to an autosomal dominant RP (adRP), splicing of Xbp1 (the IRE pathway), and induction of hsc3 (Drosophila homolog of GRP78/BiP) have been demonstrated [63]. Another study of Drosophila expressing the Rh1P37H, a homolog of mammalian P23H rhodopsin (RHO) demonstrated that the activation of Ire/Xbp1 signaling is associated with the suppression of photoreceptor neuron degeneration and blindness when the valosin containing protein, an ER-associated degradation effector and binding partner of Rh1P37H, was genetically inactivated [64]. This study suggested activated Ire1 signaling was associated with a therapeutic effect on the fly’s retina.

We have also observed the activation of this signaling pathway in adRP transgenic rat retinas expressing the P23H RHO [65], S334ter RHO [66], and mouse retinas expressing T17M RHO [67]. This splicing has been observed in parallel with activation of PERK and ATF6 (P23H and S334ter RHO rats) signaling and has confirmed that ER stress contributes to the mechanism of adRP.

Activation of the UPR has also been shown in another adRP model produced by the R69H and R129S mutants of carbonic anhydrase IV [68]. Using a transient expression system in COS-7 cells, the authors found that the underlying retinal molecular pathogenesis was associated with impaired protein trafficking to the cell surface and with activation of ER stress markers. In addition, the expression of both CA IV mutants induced elevated levels of BiP and CHOP associated with apoptotic cell death.

In addition to adRP, the cellular signaling of autosomal recessive RP (ARRP) retina has also been investigated. Progression of ARRP is closely associated with the UPR [69]. The retinas of rd1 mice carrying the nonsense mutation within rod cyclic guanosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase β subunit express the hallmarks of the activated UPR such as increased protein levels of BiP, caspase-12, and peIF2α in a time-dependent manner. These changes were accompanied by photoreceptor apoptosis suggesting that the ER stress contributed to retinal pathogenesis in rd1 mice.

In other forms of inherited retinal degeneration such as achromatopsia, progressive cone dystrophy, and AMD previously linked to the R563H and Q655X mutations of the cyclic nucleotide gated channel alpha 3 (CNGA3) subunits, activation of the UPR has also been demonstrated [70]. In 661W cells, these proteins display altered degradation rates and are retained in the ER. This ER retention was associated with increased expression of the UPR-related markers pPERK, BiP, and CHOP and with decreased cell viability. These results led to the proposal that ER stress can arise from expression of localization-defective CNG channels, and may represent a contributing factor to photoreceptor degeneration.

The most recent studies have linked ER stress to retinal degeneration, raising the question of whether ER stress is protective or proapoptotic. Recent work in mice [61,71] and flies [29] has demonstrated that the UPR may be beneficial to retinal cells during retinal degeneration and that the activation of UPR markers could be a part of retinal cellular defense. Mendes et al. proposed that mild ER stress protects photoreceptor neurons from various death stimuli in adult Drosophila [29]. Another study with animal models of retinal degeneration suggested that therapies aimed at reduction of ER stress or upregulation of ER stress-induced protective molecules in the retina could be beneficial for preserving vision [62].

Role of individual unfolded protein response markers in the mechanism of retinal degeneration

A great deal of literature suggests that UPR signaling could be targeted for therapeutic intervention in the degeneration of impaired retinal neurons. Reprogramming of the UPR could slow the rate of retinal deterioration [65,72] and in some cases even result in long-term survival of retinal cells [73]. Several methods for manipulating individual UPR markers have recently been explored. These include the use of knockout mice, pharmacological agents, and regulation of gene expression via viral vector-mediated gene delivery.

Transgenic and knockout mice to study the unfolded protein response

Development of knockout mice is important in defining the role of the UPR in the mechanism of retinal degeneration. Several mouse models allow monitoring of the UPR. These include ERAI mice expressing the XBP-1-venus fusion protein [74], ATF6α, ATF6β [75], and IRE [76] knockout mice as well as commercially available ATF4, eIF2a, PERK, caspase-12, caspase-7, and CHOP knockout mice. With the exception of the capsase-12 knockout mice provided by the mutant mouse regional resource center supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the remaining strains are commercially available from Jackson Laboratories.

In our laboratory, we have validated the role of UPR markers including CASP-7, CHOP, and BiP in the progression of adRP using CASP-7, CHOP knockout mice, and overexpression of human BiP cDNA by subretinal adeno-associated viral vector delivery (AAV-BiP/Grp78). These studies have led us to conclude that the rate of retinal degeneration in adRP animals could be modulated by reprograming the UPR. For example, CASP-7 and CHOP are proapoptotic and are activated in adRP animal models [65-67,72]. However, ablations of these two proapoptotic proteins in the T17M RHO retina gave us contrasting results [71,72]. For example, T17M RHO CASP-7−/− mice displayed significant preservation of photoreceptors and their function from P30 to P90 compared to the control mice. CASP-7 ablation also protected these mice from a light-induced decrease in ERG responses and apoptosis [72]. Ablation of the proapoptotic CHOP, however, surprisingly expedited retinal degeneration in T17M RHO mice [71]. Dark-adapted ERG analysis demonstrated that by 1 month T17M RHO CHOP−/− mice already exhibited a 70% reduction in a-wave amplitude compared to T17M RHO mice, which was associated with a 22%–24% decrease in the thickness of the outer nuclear layer. Investigating the mechanism of these observed phenomena, we found that the therapeutic effect resulting from ablation of CASP-7 in T17M RHO retinas was associated with 1) the reprogramming of the UPR through downregulation of the pATF6 (ATF6 signaling) and ATF4 (PERK signaling) proteins, 2) activation of mammalian target of rapamycin/protein kinase B (mTOR/AKT) by increased production of phosphorylated AKT, and 3) decrease in JNK-induced apoptosis via inhibition of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1-TNFα-TRAF2-pJNK pathway (Figure 1B). Alternatively, ablation of CHOP in T17M RHO retinas upregulated the PERK pathway by increasing levels of peIF2α and diminished IRE1 signaling, thus resulting in decreased spliced Xbp1 (Figure 1C). The findings of these two studies conducted with T17M RHO mice suggest that downregulation of the PERK pathway could be a novel therapeutic strategy for treating adRP.

A recent study of AMD that used the conditional RPE knockout of Xbp1 in the mouse retina demonstrated the importance of the XBP1 gene in regulating antioxidant defense in the RPE, and showed that impaired activation of XBP1 may contribute to RPE dysfunction and cell death during retinal degeneration and AMD [61]. The mice in this study expressed less superoxide dismutase 1, superoxide dismutase 2, and catalase in the RPE and experienced increased oxidative stress. The defensive role of XBP1 was also investigated in a study of the Drosophila model of retinal degeneration, which found that decreased Xbp1 gene dosage accelerated retinal degeneration in adRP retinas [63].

The role of the ATF4 transcription factor was recently explored with ATF4 knockout mice with diabetic retinas induced by streptozotocin [77]. The study found that loss of ATF4 activity markedly attenuated high glucose-induced production of intercellular adhesion molecule 1, TNF-α, and VEGF. The same study also demonstrated that adenovirus-mediated transduction of ATF4 resulted in elevated intracellular levels of adhesion molecule 1 and VEGF in Müller cells [78], thus suggesting that ATF4 plays a critical role in retinal inflammation signaling and Müller cell–derived inflammatory cytokine production in the diabetic retina. Our laboratory has also validated the role of ATF4 in the activation of ER stress in mouse retinas of OIR (data not shown) [79]. Our findings revealed that the downregulation of ATF4 induced a decrease in VEGF protein and mRNA leading to a subsequent decrease in neovascularization of the hypoxic retina, thus inhibiting disease progression.

Pharmacological modulation of unfolded protein response markers in animal models of retinal degeneration

The role of individual UPR markers in the progression of human disease was also recently studied with the help of chemical chaperons and pharmacological compounds that augmented either the activity or expression of their target molecules. The first class of modulators include sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA) and tauroursodeoxy-cholicacid (TUDCA), which have their origins in traditional Chinese medicine and have been used in humans for various diseases including retinal degeneration [28].

The study of the preservation of retinal ganglia cells (RGCs) by PBA treatment in the rat model of retinal ischemic injury was initiated in 2007 by Jeng et al. [73]. This study demonstrated that nearly 100% of the RGCs were preserved in treated animals compared with controls after preischemic intraperitoneal injection with 100 or 400 mg/kg PBA. Later studies discovered that the chemical chaperone, PBA, rescued the glaucoma phenotypes of Tg-MYOCY437H mice that activate the UPR trabecular meshwork and promote trafficking and secretion of mutant MYOC. This activation is triggered by accumulation of mutant MYOC within the ER [46,80]. An additional study with PBA was conducted in conjunction with the expression of the CNGA3 R563H and Q655X subunits in 661W cells [70]. This study demonstrated that PBA alone with TUDCA had the ability to reprogram the UPR when present in the medium. Under these conditions, spliced Xbp1, BiP, and CHOP mRNAs were significantly reduced suggesting modulation of the ER stress response. Moreover, the maturation and trafficking of localization-defective CNG channels were shown in TUDCA- and PBA-treated cells.

In another study conducted in the rat model of retinal detachment, Mantopoulos et al. concluded that TUDCA treatment does not affect ER stress levels induced by retinal detachment but decreases the level of apoptosis, inhibiting the activity of caspase-3 and -9 and preventing a decrease in the thickness of the outer nuclear layer [81]. The discrepancy between these studies suggests that additional work needs to be done to carefully characterize the therapeutic mechanism of TUDCA.

Commercial availability of pharmacological agents to selectively modulate UPR markers has facilitated the study of individual UPR components and their roles in the progression of retinal degeneration. For example, the role of caspase-12 in mice with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS), which leads to severe retinal degeneration, was recently described [82]. The study found that the level of apoptosis in BBS−/− mice was reduced from 36% to 26% in response to treatment with the caspase-12 inhibitor. Guanabenz, an inhibitor of the eIF2α phosphatase GADD34, maintained high levels of peIF2α and blocked CAP-dependent translation, thus reducing the apoptosis level to 14%. The authors proposed that the inhibition of CAP-dependent translation in the context of retinal degeneration could prevent deleterious protein overloading in the photoreceptors, thus facilitating their survival. The same study also suggested a more efficient way to maintain photoreceptors by simultaneously increasing BiP activity, inhibiting CAP-dependent translation, and inactivating caspase-12. In our own experimental mouse model (hT17M RHO CHOP−/−), a greater than eightfold increase in peIF2a, a translational inhibitor, was observed with accelerated retinal degeneration [71]. Therefore, a decrease in photoreceptor-specific gene expression including mouse and human rhodopsin, as well as cone-rod homeobox and neural retina leucine zipper transcription factors, was unsurprisingly observed together with the accumulation of rhodopsin protein in the outer nuclear layer. Regarding RHO protein, at this point it is not known if it remains within the ER or passes to the Golgi via transport membranes. However, disrupted RHO trafficking and an increase in peIF2α are the hallmarks of accelerated retinal degeneration. The observed increase in peIF2α also demands closer consideration of the details of our experiments. Although this increase is not surprising, it was not originally tested as a primary cause of the expedited retinal degeneration. Therefore, at this point it is not clear whether this increase directly accelerated retinal degeneration in T17M RHO mice or was perhaps in response to a potential decrease in GADD34. It is also not clear if the increase in peIF2α demonstrated by Mockel et al. could provide a therapeutic effect in BBS-deficient mice and if such a therapeutic effect would be sustained, since the study was conducted in mouse retinal explants. Therefore, the discrepancy between our study and Mockel et al.’s demands a more careful examination in the future of the role of peIF2.

Another recent study by Chiang et al. [83] demonstrated that selective activation of ATF6 and PERK prevented the cellular accumulation of mutant rhodopsin. These experiments were performed with stable human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells expressing TetON-ATF6f treated with doxycycline A and with sensitized HEK293 stable cell lines expressing Fv2E-PERK treated with the dimerizing molecule AP20187. The authors concluded that ATF6 signaling may be especially useful in treating retinal degenerative diseases arising from rhodopsin misfolding by preferentially clearing mutant rhodopsin and abnormal rhodopsin aggregates. Another study conducted by the same group also described that selective activation of IRE with 1NM-PP1 in mammalian cells expressing P23H RHO, robustly promoted the degradation of misfolded P23H RHO via proteasomal and lysosomal degradation pathways without affecting its wild-type counterpart [84]. Together, these studies emphasized that IRE1 and ATF6 signaling may be particularly helpful in preventing chronic ER stress in animal models of retinal degeneration.

The role of GRP78 in the mechanisms of retinal degeneration was also recently examined. The BiP Inducer Protein X (BIX) was tested in mice with tunicamycin or NMDA-induced retinal degeneration [85]. The findings showed that coadministration of BIX (5 nmol) significantly reduced retinal cell death and CHOP expression in RGCs induced by intravitreal injection of tunicamycin or NMDA. Another study of BIX conducted in 661W cells revealed a protective effect of BIX against light-induced cell death [51]. Our group also demonstrated that overexpression of the BiP slowed the rate of retinal degeneration in rats with retinitis pigmentosa [65] (see below). These studies are all in agreement with Chai et al. [86], who proposed that downregulation of GRP78 played a role in the degeneration of trabecular meshwork cells in patients with POAG. This proposal provided molecular insights into the pathogenesis of POAG and suggested that GRP78 may have the potential to be a target for developing new therapies for ER stress–induced trabecular meshwork cell apoptosis.

Viral gene delivery of unfolded protein response markers

Lentivirus, adenovirus, and adeno-associated vectors (AAV) are effective in delivering genes of interest to the retina and RPE for ocular gene therapy [87]. The use of AAV has become a valuable tool gene therapy. A new variant of this gene transfer system, engineered for ocular diseases, allows effective delivery of genes to the ocular retina after injection into the eye’s easily accessible vitreous humor [88].These latest achievements in AAV-based gene transfer should facilitate the study of molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis due to AAV’s broad cellular tropism, DNA-based genome, lack of known pathogenicity, and broad array of serotypes with unique tissue specificities.

AAV has been used to deliver a wide variety of genes to the retina. For example, the rat diabetic model injected with streptozotocin has been used to validate P58IPK, a 58-kDa inhibitor of protein kinase, as a therapeutic target for diabetic retinopathy. Interestingly, this kinase plays an important role in preventing ER stress [89]. Overexpression of P58IPK was achieved with intravitreal injection of (rAAV2)-P58(IPK), which led to a decrease in the mRNA and protein levels for CHOP, TNFα, and VEGF. This also resulted in a remarkable decrease in vascularization of diabetic retinas demonstrating the protective role of P58IPK.

Our laboratory recently validated the molecular chaperone GRP78/BiP as a therapeutic target for adRP in rat retinas expressing P23H RHO (Figure 1D) [65]. We demonstrated that BiP overexpression alleviated ER stress by reducing the levels of cleaved pATF6, peIF2α, and the proapoptotic protein CHOP. We also registered a sustained increase in ERG amplitudes during a 3-month period and later confirmed this result in injected animals monitored over 6 months (data not shown). In addition, we found that the exogenous form of BiP complexed with caspase-12 and the BH3-only protein BiK, which may have contributed to the antiapoptotic activity of BiP. Thus, we concluded that the therapeutic effect provided by overexpressed BiP is due to suppression of apoptosis rather than to the promotion of rhodopsin folding. Similar results have been obtained by Cheetham’s group [90]. The authors revealed that BiP overexpression does not enhance P23H RHO trafficking in SK-N-SHn cells, but is important for maintaining the solubility of rhodopsin in the ER.

Future perspectives

The rapid increase in the study of ER stress in different models of retinal degeneration has improved our understanding of the mechanisms of retinopathy and highlighted the role of the UPR and individual UPR markers in the pathogenesis of retinal degeneration. This suggests that the UPR markers could be potential therapeutic targets, manipulation of which could alter the rate of retinal degeneration and provide for the survival of retinal neuronal cells. Future work should concentrate on the search for pharmacological molecules that selectively inhibit or induce individual UPR markers. Additionally, an expansion of the list of available UPR animal models will facilitate identifying specific roles for every UPR component in the pathogenesis of retinal degeneration. These approaches, in combination with AAV gene delivery, should be useful tools in manipulating individual UPR markers and performing gene therapy for reprogramming the UPR.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support by the Foundation Fighting Blindness, and by NIH grant R01EY020905.

References

  1. Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011; 334:1081-6. [PMID: 22116877]
  2. Hagiwara M, Nagata K. Redox-dependent protein quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum: folding to degradation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012; 16:1119-28. [PMID: 22229892]
  3. Ma Y, Hendershot LM. ER chaperone functions during normal and stress conditions. J Chem Neuroanat. 2004; 28:51-65. [PMID: 15363491]
  4. Krebs J, Groenendyk J, Michalak M. Ca2+-signaling, alternative splicing and endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. Neurochem Res. 2011; 36:1198-211. [PMID: 21365449]
  5. Csala M, Kereszturi E, Mandl J, Banhegyi G. The endoplasmic reticulum as the extracellular space inside the cell: role in protein folding and glycosylation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012; 16:1100-8. [PMID: 22149109]
  6. Roth J, Zuber C, Park S, Jang I, Lee Y, Kysela KG, Le Fourn V, Santimaria R, Guhl B, Cho JW. Protein N-glycosylation, protein folding, and protein quality control. Mol Cells. 2010; 30:497-506. [PMID: 21340671]
  7. He B. Viruses, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and interferon responses. Cell Death Differ. 2006; 13:393-403. [PMID: 16397582]
  8. Roy CR, Salcedo SP, Gorvel JP. Pathogen-endoplasmic-reticulum interactions: in through the out door. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006; 6:136-47. [PMID: 16491138]
  9. Fels DR, Koumenis C. The PERK/eIF2alpha/ATF4 module of the UPR in hypoxia resistance and tumor growth. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006; 5:723-8. [PMID: 16861899]
  10. Szegezdi E, Logue SE, Gorman AM, Samali A. Mediators of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. EMBO Rep. 2006; 7:880-5. [PMID: 16953201]
  11. Ron D, Hubbard SR. How IRE1 reacts to ER stress. Cell. 2008; 132:24-6. [PMID: 18191217]
  12. Sommer T, Jarosch E. BiP binding keeps ATF6 at bay. Dev Cell. 2002; 3:1-2. [PMID: 12110159]
  13. Schönthal AH. Pharmacological targeting of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013; 85:653-66. [PMID: 23000916]
  14. Zhang LH, Zhang X. Roles of GRP78 in physiology and cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2010; 110:1299-305. [PMID: 20506407]
  15. Luo B, Lee AS. The critical roles of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones and unfolded protein response in tumorigenesis and anticancer therapies. Oncogene. 2013; 32:805-18. [PMID: 22508478]
  16. Chakrabarti A, Chen AW, Varner JD. A review of the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011; 108:2777-93. [PMID: 21809331]
  17. Wei J, Rahman S, Ayaub EA, Dickhout JG, Ask K. Protein misfolding and endoplasmic reticulum stress in chronic lung disease. Chest. 2013; 143:1098-105. [PMID: 23546482]
  18. Krishnamoorthy T, Pavitt GD, Zhang F, Dever TE, Hinnebusch AG. Tight binding of the phosphorylated alpha subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) to the regulatory subunits of guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B is required for inhibition of translation initiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21:5018-30. [PMID: 11438658]
  19. Maurel M, Chevet E. Endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling: the microRNA connection. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013; 304:C1117-26. [PMID: 23515532]
  20. Bravo R, Parra V, Gatica D, Rodriguez AE, Torrealba N, Paredes F, Wang ZV, Zorzano A, Hill JA, Jaimovich E, Quest AF, Lavandero S. Endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response: dynamics and metabolic integration. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol.. 2013; 301:215-90. [PMID: 23317820]
  21. Yamamoto K, Yoshida H, Kokame K, Kaufman RJ, Mori K. Differential contributions of ATF6 and XBP1 to the activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-responsive cis-acting elements ERSE, UPRE and ERSE-II. J Biochem. 2004; 136:343-50. [PMID: 15598891]
  22. Rutkowski DT, Kang SW, Goodman AG, Garrison JL, Taunton J, Katze MG, Kaufman RJ, Hegde RS. The role of p58IPK in protecting the stressed endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 2007; 18:3681-91. [PMID: 17567950]
  23. Li H, Korennykh AV, Behrman SL, Walter P. Mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1 signals by dynamic clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107:16113-8. [PMID: 20798350]
  24. Urano F, Bertolotti A, Ron D. IRE1 and efferent signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci. 2000; 113:3697-702. [PMID: 11034898]
  25. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Chung P, Harding HP, Ron D. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science. 2000; 287:664-6. [PMID: 10650002]
  26. Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Murakami S. Role of the unfolded protein response in cell death. Apoptosis. 2006; 11:5-13. [PMID: 16374548]
  27. Nishitoh H, Matsuzawa A, Tobiume K, Saegusa K, Takeda K, Inoue K, Hori S, Kakizuka A, Ichijo H. ASK1 is essential for endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced neuronal cell death triggered by expanded polyglutamine repeats. Genes Dev. 2002; 16:1345-55. [PMID: 12050113]
  28. Haeri M, Knox BE. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Unfolded Protein Response Pathways: Potential for Treating Age-related Retinal Degeneration. J Ophthalmic Vis Res.. 2012; 7:45-59. [PMID: 22737387]
  29. Mendes CS, Levet C, Chatelain G, Dourlen P, Fouillet A, Dichtel-Danjoy ML, Gambis A, Ryoo HD, Steller H, Mollereau B. ER stress protects from retinal degeneration. EMBO J. 2009; 28:1296-307. [PMID: 19339992]
  30. Athanasiou D, Aguila M, Bevilacqua D, Novoselov SS, Parfitt DA, Cheetham ME. The cell stress machinery and retinal degeneration. FEBS Lett. 2013; 587:2008-17. [PMID: 23684651]
  31. Shimazawa M, Inokuchi Y, Ito Y, Murata H, Aihara M, Miura M, Araie M, Hara H. Involvement of ER stress in retinal cell death. Mol Vis. 2007; 13:578-87. [PMID: 17438523]
  32. Ikesugi K, Mulhern ML, Madson CJ, Hosoya K, Terasaki T, Kador PF, Shinohara T. Induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress in retinal pericytes by glucose deprivation. Curr Eye Res. 2006; 31:947-53. [PMID: 17114120]
  33. Li J, Wang JJ, Yu Q, Wang M, Zhang SX. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is implicated in retinal inflammation and diabetic retinopathy. FEBS Lett. 2009; 583:1521-7. [PMID: 19364508]
  34. Li B, Wang HS, Li GG, Zhao MJ, Zhao MH. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the early stage of diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 2011; 48:103-11. [PMID: 19924374]
  35. Nakamura S, Takizawa H, Shimazawa M, Hashimoto Y, Sugitani S, Tsuruma K, Hara H. Mild Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Promotes Retinal Neovascularization via Induction of BiP/GRP78. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:e60517 [PMID: 23544152]
  36. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:262-7. [PMID: 16488940]
  37. Mansour-Robaey S, Clarke DB, Wang YC, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Effects of ocular injury and administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on survival and regrowth of axotomized retinal ganglion cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:1632-6. [PMID: 8127857]
  38. Zweifel LS, Kuruvilla R, Ginty DD. Functions and mechanisms of retrograde neurotrophin signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6:615-25. [PMID: 16062170]
  39. Tezel G, Wax MB. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in the glaucomatous retina and optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:1348-56. [PMID: 15364715]
  40. Vorwerk CK, Naskar R, Schuettauf F, Zurakowski D, McDermott LM, Quinto KM, Dreyer EB. Excitotoxicity can be mediated through an interaction within the optic nerve; activation of cell body NMDA receptors is not required. Vet Ophthalmol. 2001; 4:201-4. [PMID: 11722784]
  41. Naskar R, Vorwerk CK, Dreyer EB. Concurrent downregulation of a glutamate transporter and receptor in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:1940-4. [PMID: 10845620]
  42. Erdurmuş M, Yagci R, Atis O, Karadag R, Akbas A, Hepsen IF. Antioxidant status and oxidative stress in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2011; 36:713-8. [PMID: 21780920]
  43. Tezel G, Yang X, Yang J, Wax MB. Role of tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 in the death of retinal ganglion cells following optic nerve crush injury in mice. Brain Res. 2004; 996:202-12. [PMID: 14697498]
  44. Tezel G, Wax MB. The immune system and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15:80-4. [PMID: 15021215]
  45. Tezel G, Yang J, Wax MB. Heat shock proteins, immunity and glaucoma. Brain Res Bull. 2004; 62:473-80. [PMID: 15036560]
  46. Zode GS, Kuehn MH, Nishimura DY, Searby CC, Mohan K, Grozdanic SD, Bugge K, Anderson MG, Clark AF, Stone EM, Sheffield VC. Reduction of ER stress via a chemical chaperone prevents disease phenotypes in a mouse model of primary open angle glaucoma. J Clin Invest. 2011; 121:3542-53. [PMID: 21821918]
  47. Liu H, Qian J, Wang F, Sun X, Xu X, Xu W, Zhang X, Zhang X. Expression of two endoplasmic reticulum stress markers, GRP78 and GADD153, in rat retinal detachment model and its implication. Eye (Lond). 2010; 24:137-44. [PMID: 19218986]
  48. Zhu H, Qian J, Wang W, Yan Q, Xu Y, Jiang Y, Zhang L, Lu F, Hu W, Zhang X, Wang F, Sun X. RNA Interference of GADD153 Protects Photoreceptors from Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptosis after Retinal Detachment. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:e59339 [PMID: 23555658]
  49. Yang LP, Wu LM, Guo XJ, Li Y, Tso MO. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is activated in light-induced retinal degeneration. J Neurosci Res. 2008; 86:910-9. [PMID: 17929311]
  50. Kroeger H, Messah C, Ahern K, Gee J, Joseph V, Matthes MT, Yasumura D, Gorbatyuk MS, Chiang WC, LaVail MM, Lin JH. Induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress genes, BiP and chop, in genetic and environmental models of retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:7590-9. [PMID: 23074209]
  51. Nakanishi T, Shimazawa M, Sugitani S, Kudo T, Imai S, Inokuchi Y, Tsuruma K, Hara H. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in light-induced photoreceptor degeneration in mice. J Neurochem. 2013; 125:111-24. [PMID: 23216380]
  52. Krishnamoorthy RR, Crawford MJ, Chaturvedi MM, Jain SK, Aggarwal BB, Al-Ubaidi MR, Agarwal N. Photo-oxidative stress down-modulates the activity of nuclear factor-kappaB via involvement of caspase-1, leading to apoptosis of photoreceptor cells. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274:3734-43. [PMID: 9920926]
  53. Tanaka J, Nakanishi T, Ogawa K, Tsuruma K, Shimazawa M, Shimoda H, Hara H. Purple rice extract and anthocyanidins of the constituents protect against light-induced retinal damage in vitro and in vivo. J Agric Food Chem. 2011; 59:528-36. [PMID: 21175193]
  54. Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2606-17. [PMID: 18550876]
  55. Ding X, Patel M, Chan CC. Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28:1-18. [PMID: 19026761]
  56. Pennesi ME, Neuringer M, Courtney RJ. Animal models of age related macular degeneration. Mol Aspects Med. 2012; 33:487-509. [PMID: 22705444]
  57. Libby RT, Gould DB. Endoplasmic reticulum stress as a primary pathogenic mechanism leading to age-related macular degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010; 664:403-9. [PMID: 20238041]
  58. Li Y, Wang YS, Shen XF, Hui YN, Han J, Zhao W, Zhu J. Alterations of activity and intracellular distribution of the 20S proteasome in ageing retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp Gerontol. 2008; 43:1114-22. [PMID: 18817863]
  59. Ryhänen T, Hyttinen JM, Kopitz J, Rilla K, Kuusisto E, Mannermaa E, Viiri J, Holmberg CI, Immonen I, Meri S, Parkkinen J, Eskelinen EL, Uusitalo H, Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. Crosstalk between Hsp70 molecular chaperone, lysosomes and proteasomes in autophagy-mediated proteolysis in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2009; 13:3616-31. [PMID: 19017362]
  60. Yoshikawa T, Ogata N, Izuta H, Shimazawa M, Hara H, Takahashi K. Increased expression of tight junctions in ARPE-19 cells under endoplasmic reticulum stress. Curr Eye Res. 2011; 36:1153-63. [PMID: 21978097]
  61. Zhong Y, Li J, Wang JJ, Chen C, Tran JT, Saadi A, Yu Q, Le YZ, Mandal MN, Anderson RE, Zhang SX. X-box binding protein 1 is essential for the anti-oxidant defense and cell survival in the retinal pigment epithelium. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e38616 [PMID: 22715395]
  62. Roybal CN, Marmorstein LY, Vander Jagt DL, Abcouwer SF. Aberrant accumulation of fibulin-3 in the endoplasmic reticulum leads to activation of the unfolded protein response and VEGF expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:3973-9. [PMID: 16249470]
  63. Ryoo HD, Domingos PM, Kang MJ, Steller H. Unfolded protein response in a Drosophila model for retinal degeneration. EMBO J. 2007; 26:242-52. [PMID: 17170705]
  64. Griciuc A, Aron L, Roux MJ, Klein R, Giangrande A, Ueffing M. Inactivation of VCP/ter94 suppresses retinal pathology caused by misfolded rhodopsin in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6:6 [PMID: 20865169]
  65. Gorbatyuk MS, Knox T, LaVail MM, Gorbatyuk OS, Noorwez SM, Hauswirth WW, Lin JH, Muzyczka N, Lewin AS. Restoration of visual function in P23H rhodopsin transgenic rats by gene delivery of BiP/Grp78. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107:5961-6. [PMID: 20231467]
  66. Shinde VM, Sizova OS, Lin JH, LaVail MM, Gorbatyuk MS. ER stress in retinal degeneration in S334ter Rho rats. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e33266 [PMID: 22432009]
  67. Kunte MM, Choudhury S, Manheim JF, Shinde VM, Miura M, Chiodo VA, Hauswirth WW, Gorbatyuk OS, Gorbatyuk MS. ER stress is involved in T17M rhodopsin-induced retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:3792-800. [PMID: 22589437]
  68. Datta R, Waheed A, Bonapace G, Shah GN, Sly WS. Pathogenesis of retinitis pigmentosa associated with apoptosis-inducing mutations in carbonic anhydrase IV. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106:3437-42. [PMID: 19211803]
  69. Yang LP, Wu LM, Guo XJ, Tso MO. Activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress in degenerating photoreceptors of the rd1 mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:5191-8. [PMID: 17962473]
  70. Duricka DL, Brown RL, Varnum MD. Defective trafficking of cone photoreceptor CNG channels induces the unfolded protein response and ER-stress-associated cell death. Biochem J. 2012; 441:685-96. [PMID: 21992067]
  71. Nashine S, Bhootada Y, Lewin A, Gorbatyuk M. Ablation of C/EBP Homologous Protein Does Not Protect T17M RHO Mice from Retinal Degeneration. PLoS ONE. 2013; [PMID: 23646198]
  72. Choudhury S, Bhootada Y, Gorbatyuk O, Gorbatyuk M. Caspase-7 ablation modulates UPR, reprograms TRAF2-JNK apoptosis and protects T17M rhodopsin mice from severe retinal degeneration. Cell Death Dis. 2013; 4:e528 [PMID: 23470535]
  73. Jeng YY, Lin NT, Chang PH, Huang YP, Pang VF, Liu CH, Lin CT. Retinal ischemic injury rescued by sodium 4-phenylbutyrate in a rat model. Exp Eye Res. 2007; 84:486-92. [PMID: 17178414]
  74. Iwawaki T, Akai R, Kohno K, Miura M. A transgenic mouse model for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Med. 2004; 10:98-102. [PMID: 14702639]
  75. Yamamoto K, Sato T, Matsui T, Sato M, Okada T, Yoshida H, Harada A, Mori K. Transcriptional induction of mammalian ER quality control proteins is mediated by single or combined action of ATF6alpha and XBP1. Dev Cell. 2007; 13:365-76. [PMID: 17765680]
  76. Bertolotti A, Wang X, Novoa I, Jungreis R, Schlessinger K, Cho JH, West AB, Ron D. Increased sensitivity to dextran sodium sulfate colitis in IRE1beta-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107:585-93. [PMID: 11238559]
  77. Chen Y, Wang JJ, Li J, Hosoya KI, Ratan R, Townes T, Zhang SX. Activating transcription factor 4 mediates hyperglycaemia-induced endothelial inflammation and retinal vascular leakage through activation of STAT3 in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012; 55:2533-45. [PMID: 22660795]
  78. Zhong Y, Li J, Chen Y, Wang JJ, Ratan R, Zhang SX. Activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress by hyperglycemia is essential for Muller cell-derived inflammatory cytokine production in diabetes. Diabetes. 2012; 61:492-504. [PMID: 22228718]
  79. Wang X, Wang G, Kunte M, Shinde V, Gorbatyuk M. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Genetic Manipulation of ATF4 in a Mouse Modulation of Angiogenesis by Genetic Manipulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54:5995-6002. [PMID: 23942974]
  80. Zode GS, Bugge KE, Mohan K, Grozdanic SD, Peters JC, Koehn DR, Anderson MG, Kardon RH, Stone EM, Sheffield VC. Topical ocular sodium 4-phenylbutyrate rescues glaucoma in a myocilin mouse model of primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:1557-65. [PMID: 22328638]
  81. Mantopoulos D, Murakami Y, Comander J, Thanos A, Roh M, Miller JW, Vavvas DG. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) protects photoreceptors from cell death after experimental retinal detachment. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e24245 [PMID: 21961034]
  82. Mockel A, Obringer C, Hakvoort TB, Seeliger M, Lamers WH, Stoetzel C, Dollfus H, Marion V. Pharmacological modulation of the retinal unfolded protein response in Bardet-Biedl syndrome reduces apoptosis and preserves light detection ability. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287:37483-94. [PMID: 22869374]
  83. Chiang WC, Hiramatsu N, Messah C, Kroeger H, Lin JH. Selective activation of ATF6 and PERK endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathways prevent mutant rhodopsin accumulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:7159-66. [PMID: 22956602]
  84. Chiang WC, Messah C, Lin JH. IRE1 directs proteasomal and lysosomal degradation of misfolded rhodopsin. Mol Biol Cell. 2012; 23:758-70. [PMID: 22219383]
  85. Inokuchi Y, Nakajima Y, Shimazawa M, Kurita T, Kubo M, Saito A, Sajiki H, Kudo T, Aihara M, Imaizumi K, Araie M, Hara H. Effect of an inducer of BiP, a molecular chaperone, on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced retinal cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:334-44. [PMID: 18757512]
  86. Chai F, Luo R, Li Y, Bai Y, He Y, Wei Y, Yan Z, Ge J, Zhuo Y. Down-regulation of GRP78 in human glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cells. Mol Vis. 2010; 16:1122-31. [PMID: 20664690]
  87. Rossmiller B, Mao H, Lewin AS. Gene therapy in animal models of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Mol Vis. 2012; 18:2479-96. [PMID: 23077406]
  88. Dalkara D, Byrne LC, Klimczak RR, Visel M, Yin L, Merigan WH, Flannery JG, Schaffer DV. In vivo-directed evolution of a new adeno-associated virus for therapeutic outer retinal gene delivery from the vitreous. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5:89a76 [PMID: 23761039]
  89. Yang H, Liu R, Cui Z, Chen ZQ, Yan S, Pei H, Li B. Functional characterization of 58-kilodalton inhibitor of protein kinase in protecting against diabetic retinopathy via the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Mol Vis. 2011; 17:78-84. [PMID: 21245960]
  90. Athanasiou D, Kosmaoglou M, Kanuga N, Novoselov SS, Paton AW, Paton JC, Chapple JP, Cheetham ME. BiP prevents rod opsin aggregation. Mol Biol Cell. 2012; 23:3522-31. [PMID: 22855534]
  91. Nishitoh H, Saitoh M, Mochida Y, Takeda K, Nakano H, Rothe M, Miyazono K, Ichijo H. ASK1 is essential for JNK/SAPK activation by TRAF2. Mol Cell. 1998; 2:389-95. [PMID: 9774977]
  92. Yoneda T, Imaizumi K, Oono K, Yui D, Gomi F, Katayama T, Tohyama M. Activation of caspase-12, an endoplastic reticulum (ER) resident caspase, through tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2-dependent mechanism in response to the ER stress. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:13935-40. [PMID: 11278723]
  93. Rao RV, Hermel E, Castro-Obregon S, del Rio G, Ellerby LM, Ellerby HM, Bredesen DE. Coupling endoplasmic reticulum stress to the cell death program. Mechanism of caspase activation. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:33869-74. [PMID: 11448953]
  94. Kaur J, Mencl S, Sahaboglu A, Farinelli P, van Veen T, Zrenner E, Ekstrom P, Paquet-Durand F, Arango-Gonzalez B. Calpain and PARP activation during photoreceptor cell death in P23H and S334ter rhodopsin mutant rats. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e22181 [PMID: 21765948]