Table 3 of Huang, Mol Vis 2013; 19:1211-1221.
Genotype contrast | Na | Cases/Controls | OR (95% CI) | Significance (Z test)b | Heterogeneity(Q test) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z | P | Q | I2 (%) | P | ||||
overall | 4 | 554/551 | ||||||
T versus C | 1.15 (0.86–1.56) | 0.98 | 0.32 | 7.96 | 62.3 | 0.04 | ||
TT versus CC | 1.50 (0.71–3.16) | 1.07 | 0.28 | 10.51 | 71.5 | 0.01 | ||
CT versus CC | 0.90 (0.69–1.18) | 0.72 | 0.47 | 5.72 | 47.6 | 0.12 | ||
TT versus CT | 1.74 (1.22–2.48) | 3.09 | 0 | 3.96 | 24.2 | 0.26 | ||
(CT+TT) versus CC | 0.98 (0.65–1.49) | 0.05 | 0.95 | 7.72 | 61.1 | 0.05 | ||
TT versus (CC+CT) | 1.69 (0.98–2.89) | 1.92 | 0.05 | 6.63 | 54.8 | 0.08 | ||
(CC+TT) versus CT | 1.23 (0.97–1.57) | 1.73 | 0.08 | 2.84 | 0 | 0.41 | ||
wet AMD | 4 | 414/551 | ||||||
T versus C | 1.13 (0.83–1.54) | 0.8 | 0.42 | 7.32 | 59 | 0.06 | ||
TT versus CC | 1.44 (0.68–3.05) | 0.95 | 0.34 | 9.5 | 68.4 | 0.02 | ||
CT versus CC | 0.82 (0.54–1.26) | 0.87 | 0.38 | 6.12 | 51 | 0.1 | ||
TT versus CT | 1.82 (1.22–2.71) | 2.97 | 0 | 2.51 | 0 | 0.47 | ||
(CT+TT) versus CC | 0.94 (0.60–1.48) | 0.24 | 0.81 | 7.86 | 61.8 | 0.04 | ||
TT versus (CC+CT) | 1.63 (1.13–2.35) | 2.66 | 0 | 5.24 | 42.7 | 0.15 | ||
(CC+TT) versus CT | 1.25 (0.96–1.63) | 1.69 | 0.09 | 3.07 | 2.4 | 0.38 |