Molecular Vision 2012; 18:504-511 <http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v18/a55>
Received 5 December 2011 | Accepted 21 February 2012 | Published 24 February 2012

Identification and study of a FBN1 gene mutation in a Chinese family with ectopia lentis

Hongyi Li,1 Wei Qu,1 Bo Meng,1 Shuihua Zhang,1 Tao Yang,2 Shangzhi Huang,2 Huiping Yuan1

The first three authors contributed equally to the work

1Department of Ophthalmology, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Department of Ophthalmology Key laboratory, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; 2Department of Medical Genetics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, WHO Collaborating Centre for Community Control of Hereditary Diseases, Beijing, China

Correspondence to: Huiping Yuan, Department of Ophthalmology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, P.R.China 150086; Phone: 86-451-86605757; FAX: 86-451-86605757; email: yuanhp@yahoo.com

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the mutation in the fibrillin-1 gene (FBN1) in a Chinese family with ectopia lentis (EL) and to predict the structural and functional consequences of the mutation.

Methods: Patients and family members were given complete physical, ophthalmic, and cardiovascular examinations. Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes of venous blood of three affected and three unaffected individuals in the family, and 100 healthy controls. All 65 coding exons and their flanking intronic boundaries of FBN1 were amplified in the proband by polymerase chain reaction, followed by direct sequencing. The mutation identified in the proband was screened for in other family members and 100 healthy controls by direct sequencing. Protein conservation analysis was performed in seven species using an online ClustalW tool. Protein structure was modeled based on the Protein data bank and mutated in PyMOL 1.1r1 to predict the structural and functional consequences of the mutation.

Results: A heterozygous c.2262A>G change in exon 18 of FBN1 was detected in the proband, which resulted in the substitution of tyrosine by cysteine at codon 754 (p.Y754C). This mutation was also present in the affected family members, but absent in other unaffected family members and 100 healthy controls. The mutant residue, located in the calcium binding epidermal growth factor-like7 domain, was highly conserved among mammalian species. The mutation could probably affect the disulfide bond formation of the domain and calcium binding of the adjacent domain, which would induce a critical functional change of the domain itself and neighboring domains.

Conclusions: We indentified a p.Y754C mutation in FBN1, which is the causative mutation for EL in this family. This missense mutation introduced an additional cysteine residue by substitution of a highly conserved tyrosine residue within the cbEGF-like7 module.

Introduction

Ectopia lentis (EL; OMIM 129600) is an inherited connective disorder characterized by lens dislocation connected with stretched or discontinuous zonular filaments [1]. It often occurs as one of the symptoms of Marfan syndrome (MFS; OMIM 154700), an autosomal dominant disorder that is characterized by manifestations mainly involving the cardiovascular, skeletal, and ocular systems [2]. The diagnosis of MFS is made according to the Ghent nosology [3]. Isolated EL or predominant EL with relatively mild skeletal features belongs to Marfan-related disorders as it does not satisfy the Ghent criteria.

Mutations in the gene of human fibrillin-1 (FBN1), fibrillin-2 (FBN2), transforming growth factor-β receptor-1 (TGFBR-1), and transforming growth factor-β receptor-2 (TGFBR-2) cause MFS [4-7]. Isolated or predominant EL is mainly caused by mutations in FBN1 on chromosome 15q21.1 [4]. Human FBN1, a 350 kDa modular glycoprotein, is a major component of the 10–12 nm extra-cellular matrix (ECM) microfibrils [8]. The structure of fibrillin-1 reveals a highly repetitive protein that contains three repeated modules: 47 epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like modules (43 calcium binding (or cb) EGF-like modules and 4 non-cb EGF-like modules), seven transforming growth factor-binding (or TB) protein like modules (8 Cys/TB), and two hybrid modules [9]. To date, over 600 FBN1 mutations spread over the entire gene have been registered in the Universal Mutation Database (UMD)-FBN1 database for MFS and its related diseases [10]. Missense mutations account for a major proportion (more than 60%) of the pathogenic mutations, and the majority of these mutations are localized in cbEGF domains (including those which result in substitution of calcium-binding residues or cysteine residues involved in the formation of disulphide bonds) [11,12].

Presently, no genotype/phenotype correlations have been identified except for neonatal MFS [13]. Besides, some recent studies showed strong correlations between isolated or predominant EL and cysteine substitutions, regardless of its location within the protein [14]. As a result, long-term study on genotype/phenotype correlations for MFS and its related diseases is vital, and molecular analysis of FBN1 is becoming important for the possibility of prenatal diagnosis and detecting at-risk individuals at an early stage for awaking of serious output of the disease.

In the present study, we investigated a two-generation family affected with EL and found a missense mutation in the cbEGF-like7 domain of FBN1. The mutation found in affected individuals was not observed in any of the healthy ones. We predicted here the structural and functional consequences of the mutation and demonstrated the crucial role for tyrosine at this position in cbEGF-like domains.

Methods

Subjects

The family history revealed three affected members with EL. All the patients (II:3, III:2, and III:3) and three non-carrier members, including a spouse (II:5, III:1, and II:4), of the family were given complete physical, ophthalmic, and cardiovascular examinations after obtaining informed consent (Figure 1). One hundred control subjects without features of EL or MFS were also recruited. The study was approved by Harbin Medical University Ethics Committee (Harbin, China).

Genomic DNA preparation

Whole blood from six available members of the family (II:3, II:4, II:5, III:1, III:2, and III:3) and one hundred unrelated controls were collected in tubes containing EDTA as an anticoagulant. Genomic DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (Tiangen Biltech Co. Ltd, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Mutation analysis of FBN1

All 65 coding exons and flanking intronic regions including splice sites of FBN1 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a set of primers listed in Appendix 1. The PCR products were subsequently purified with a TIANgel Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen Biltech Co. Ltd) and sequenced with an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequencing results were assembled and analyzed using the Chromas 2.22 software (Technelysium Pty. Ltd., QLD, Australia) with reference sequence (NG_008805) on the NCBI website. The mutation was confirmed by bidirectional sequencing.

Protein structure analysis

Orthologs of FBN1 were identified with the UMD and NCBI websites, and sequences were aligned using an online ClustalW tool. Schematic of the cbEGF-like domain of human fibrillin-1 was used to assess the possible impact of the mutation at the secondary structure level [15]. A homology 3D model of the cbEGF-like7 domain was created based on the Protein data bank (PDB) template 1EMN (47% sequence identity), which demonstrated the solution structure of a pair of cbEGF-like domains of human fibrillin-1 [12]. PyMOL 1.1r1 was used to display the structure file and to predict the potential consequence of the mutation.

Results

Clinical features

All affected family members (II:3, III:2, and III:3) showed similar clinical symptoms: bilateral EL (Figure 2) was discovered in the three patients, and none of them displayed skeletal or cardiovascular abnormalities. The unaffected family members, including a spouse (II:5, III:1, and II:4), appeared normal.

Mutation analysis

Direct sequencing of FBN1 revealed a heterozygous mutation, c.2262A>G in exon 18, which resulted in the substitution of tyrosine by cysteine (p.Y754C; Figure 3A). The mutation identified in the proband was also found in II:3 and III:3 (Figure 3B,C). No mutation was detected in the healthy family members (II:5, III:1, and II:4; Figure 3D-F) or any of the 100 unrelated control subjects (Figure 3G).

Potential consequences of the mutation

This missense mutation c.2262A>G resulted in the substitution of tyrosine by cysteine at codon 754 in the cbEGF-like7 domain. The tyrosine754 residue, which was present in 18/43 (42%) cbEGF-like modules in fibrillin-1, was localized in a β-sheet between obligatory cysteine residues at the C5 and C6 positions. Protein conservation analysis showed that the tyrosine754 was highly conserved among seven mammalian species (Figure 3H). Secondary structure analysis of the cbEGF-like7 domain revealed that the mutant residue was located at the region between cysteine750 and cysteine763 (Figure 4A). Prediction by PyMOL 1.1r1 showed a loss of benzene ring due to the Y754C mutation and an additional disulfide bond formation between cysteine750 and cysteine754, which simultaneously disrupted the conserved disulfide bond between cysteine750 and cysteine763. These led to a critical structure change: the β-sheet between obligatory glycine753 and aspartic765 transformed to a loop-region. domain change of this nature could probably alter the volume of the calcium binding pocket of the posterior cbEGF-like domain because the distance between cysteine754 and the residues that formed β-turn of the pocket become farther than in the wild type (Figure 4B −4G). In addition, the protein surface area of the mutant region was smaller than that of the wild type (Figure 4H,I). In summary, the conformation and function of the mutant domain were likely to be strongly altered by the presence of this mutation, extending to neighboring domains as well.

Discussion

In this study, we identified a heterozygous FBN1 mutation (c.2262A>G) in a Northeast Chinese family affected with EL. This missense mutation introduced an additional cysteine residue by substitution of a highly conserved tyrosine residue within the cbEGF-like7 module.

This mutation, p.Y754C, has been previously reported in three other families: a large family of European and Australian Aboriginal origin, and two Central Chinese families [16-18]. All three families met the criteria for a diagnosis of MFS and, interestingly, the overwhelming majority of members from each family had lens subluxation, with or without cardiovascular and skeletal abnormalities. In our study, the only manifestation in the family was lens subluxation. These data demonstrate a complete correlation between p.Y754C mutation and lens subluxation. Nevertheless, more studies should be done to confirm this conclusion. To date, eight novel mutations have been published in the UMD database in the cbEGF-like7 domain, and seven of them are mutations creating or substituting cysteine residues [19-23]. A striking result of a recent study involving over a thousand probands with MFS and FBN1 mutations is the strong correlation found between EL and the presence of a mutation affecting a cysteine residue [14], which also confirms earlier conclusions on a smaller sample [16,24-27]. These findings suggest that cysteine residues may have a critical function in suspensory ligaments of the eyes and led to the speculation that the pathophysiology of ectopia lentis is related to a disruption of the structural function of fibrillin-1 in the 10–12 nm extracellular microfibrils in the ciliary zonule [14,27].

It is clear that EGF-like domains play a major role in the pathogenesis of fibrillinopathies [28]. Each cbEGF-like domain of fibrillin-1 contains six highly conserved cysteine residues that form three intra-domain disulphide bonds generating an anti-parallel β-pleated sheet conformation and a consensus sequence for calcium binding in the NH2-terminal region [12,29]. In the cbEGF-like7 domain, the intra-domain disulphide bonds are formed between cysteine727 and cysteine739, cysteine734 and cysteine748, and cysteine 750 and cysteine 763, respectively, according to the UMD database. The mutation found in our study, located at the region between cysteine 750 and cysteine 763, introduced an extra cysteine. A detailed study performed by PyMOl showed that the extra cysteine could probably disrupt the third conserved disulfide bond and introduce an additional one, which would break the β-sheet between obligatory cysteine 750 and aspartic765. It is evident that three disulfide bonds are required to maintain the cbEGF-like module-fold. The loss or addition of cysteine residues would result in module misfolding, which in turn may have deleterious effects on the global structure of fibrillin-1 and delay intracellular processing and/or secretion from the cell that lead to severe reduction of matrix deposition [30-32]. Prediction by PyMOL also indicated that such a change of the domain could probably influence the packing interaction of the cbEGF-like7 and cbEGF-like8 domain and alter the volume of the calcium-binding pocket of the adjacent cbEGF-like8 domain, which may affect calcium binding affinity of the cbEGF-like8 and expose the loop between the cysteines at the C3 and C4 positions to proteases. This would cause unexpected endoplasmic reticulum retention of the protein, consistent with a protein folding defect, and increase the susceptibility of fibrillin peptides to proteolysis [15]. In support of our speculation, a recent study by Vollbrandt et al. [33] demonstrated that a C750G substitution of FBN1 that disrupt the cysteine750-cysteine763 disulfide bond of cbEGF-like7 caused increased proteolytic susceptibility of cbEGF-like8. On the protein level, the misfolded domain of the mutant protein may be degraded by intracellular mechanisms or retained within the cell, or escape from quality control surveillance in the cell. For the latter, on encountering the extracellular space, mutant proteins may be rapidly degraded by proteases in the surrounding environment or may subsequently disrupt a specific protein–protein interaction required for the assembly of fibrillin-1 or interactions of microfibrils with other cell-matrix components [34]. This theory can also be proved by immunohistochemical staining of fibrillin in fibroblast cultures of patients from the Australia family carrying the same p.Y754C mutation: in normal fibroblasts, most of the fibrillin was located in the extracellular area, and the fibers were long, smooth, and fine in appearance; in mutant fibroblasts, most of the fibrillin was found within the cells, and the limited amount of fibrillin in the extracellular matrix was disorganized and appeared clumped rather than fibrous [16].

Collectively, evidences from our study and published data supported that the p.Y754C mutation was the causative mutation for EL in this family. Mutations involving cysteine substitutions in cbEGF-like domains of FBN1 play a critical role in the pathogenesis of EL. Our study offers the first predictions on the structural and functional consequences of this mutation in detail. The result expands the genotype-phenotype spectrum of FBN1 and helps the study of the molecular pathogenesis of EL and Marfan-related disorders.

Appendix 1. Primers used for FBN1 amplification.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the patients and their family, as well as the healthy volunteers, for their help and cooperation. This study was supported by the Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (ZD201015), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Educational Committee (12521261), and a grant from the Key Program of the Science Foundation of the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University (2010).

References

  1. Dietz HC, Pyeritz RE. Mutations in the human gene for fibrillin-1 (FBN1) in the Marfan syndrome and related disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 1995; 4:1799-809. [PMID: 8541880]
  2. Robinson PN, Godfrey M. The molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and related microfibrillopathies. J Med Genet. 2000; 37:9-25. [PMID: 10633129]
  3. Loeys BL, Dietz HC, Braverman AC, Callewaert BL, De Backer J, Devereux RB, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, Jondeau G, Faivre L, Milewicz DM, Pyeritz RE, Sponseller PD, Wordsworth P, De Paepe AM. The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome. J Med Genet. 2010; 47:476-85. [PMID: 20591885]
  4. Dietz HC, Cutting GR, Pyeritz RE, Maslen CL, Sakai LY, Corson GM, Puffenberger EG, Hamosh A, Nanthakumar EJ, Curristin SM, Stetten G, Meyers DA, Francomano CA. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature. 1991; 352:337-9. [PMID: 1852208]
  5. Mizuguchi T, Collod-Beroud G, Akiyama T, Abifadel M, Harada N, Morisaki T, Allard D, Varret M, Claustres M, Morisaki H, Ihara M, Kinoshita A, Yoshiura K, Junien C, Kajii T, Jondeau G, Ohta T, Kishino T, Furukawa Y, Nakamura Y, Niikawa N, Boileau C, Matsumoto N. Heterozygous TGFBR2 mutations in Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2004; 36:855-60. [PMID: 15235604]
  6. Singh KK, Rommel K, Mishra A, Karck M, Haverich A, Schmidtke J, Arslan-Kirchner M. TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 mutations in patients with features of Marfan syndrome and Loeys Dietz syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2006; 27:770-7. [PMID: 16799921]
  7. Sakai H, Visser R, Ikegawa S, Ito E, Numabe H, Watanabe Y, Mikami H, Kondoh T, Kitoh H, Sugiyama R, Okamoto N, Ogata T, Fodde R, Mizuno S, Takamura K, Egashira M, Sasaki N, Watanabe S, Nishimaki S, Takada F, Nagai T, Okada Y, Aoka Y, Yasuda K, Iwasa M, Kogaki S, Harada N, Mizuguchi T, Matsumoto N. Comprehensive genetic analysis of four relevant genes in 49 patients with Marfan syndrome or Marfan-related phenotypes. Am J Med Genet. 2006; 140:1719-25. [PMID: 16835936]
  8. Sakai LY, Keene DR, Engvall E. Fibrillin, a new 350-kD glycoprotein, is a component of extracellular microfibrils. J Cell Biol. 1986; 103:2499-509. [PMID: 3536967]
  9. Collod-Béroud G, Boileau C. Marfan syndrome in the third Millennium. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002; 10:673-81. [PMID: 12404097]
  10. Stheneur C, Collod-Béroud G, Faivre L, Buyck JF, Gouya L, Le Parc JM, Moura B, Muti C, Grandchamp B, Sultan G, Claustres M, Aegerter P, Chevallier B, Jondeau G, Boileau C. Identification of the minimal combination of clinical features in probands for efficient mutation detection in the FBN1 gene. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 17:1121-8. [PMID: 19293843]
  11. Collod-Béroud G, Le Bourdelles S, Ades L, Ala-Kokko L, Booms P, Boxer M, Child A, Comeglio P, De Paepe A, Hyland JC, Holman K, Kaitila I, Loeys B, Matyas G, Nuytinck L, Peltonen L, Rantamaki T, Robinson P, Steinmann B, Junien C, Béroud C, Boileau C. Update of the UMD-FBN1 mutation database and creation of an FBN1 polymorphism database. Hum Mutat. 2003; 22:199-208. [PMID: 12938084]
  12. Downing AK, Knott V, Werner JM, Cardy CM, Campbell ID, Handford PA. Solution structure of a pair of calcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like domains: implications for the Marfan syndrome and other genetic disorders. Cell. 1996; 85:597-605. [PMID: 8653794]
  13. Tiecke F, Katzke S, Booms P, Robinson PN, Neumann L, Godfrey M, Mathews KR, Scheuner M, Hinkel GK, Brenner RE, Hovels-Gurich HH, Hagemeier C, Fuchs J, Skovby F, Rosenberg T. Classic, atypically severe and neonatal Marfan syndrome: twelve mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in FBN1 exons 24–40. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001; 9:13-21. [PMID: 11175294]
  14. Faivre L, Collod-Beroud G, Loeys BL, Child A, Binquet C, Gautier E, Callewaert B, Arbustini E, Mayer K, Arslan-Kirchner M, Kiotsekoglou A, Comeglio P, Marziliano N, Dietz HC, Halliday D, Beroud C, Bonithon-Kopp C, Claustres M, Muti C, Plauchu H, Robinson PN, Adès LC, Biggin A, Benetts B, Brett M, Holman KJ, De Backer J, Coucke P, Francke U, De Paepe A, Jondeau G, Boileau C. Effect of mutation type and location on clinical outcome in 1,013 probands with Marfan syndrome or related phenotypes and FBN1 mutations: an international study. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81:454-66. [PMID: 17701892]
  15. Whiteman P, Willis AC, Warner A, Brown J, Redfield C, Handford PA. Cellular and molecular studies of Marfan syndrome mutations identify co-operative protein folding in the cbEGF12–13 region of fibrillin-1. Hum Mol Genet. 2007; 16:907-18. [PMID: 17324963]
  16. Summers KM, Xu D, West JA, McGill JJ, Galbraith A, Whight CM, Brocque SL, Nataatmadja M, Kong LK, Dondey J, Stark D, West MJ. An integrated approach to management of Marfan syndrome caused by an FBN1 exon 18 mutation in an Australian Aboriginal family. Clin Genet. 2004; 65:66-9. [PMID: 15032979]
  17. Xu D, Wan F, Wang J. A novel mutation in exon 18 of the FBN1 gene causes Marfan syndrome with cardiovascular and ocular abnormatities. Beijing Medical Journal. 2001; 23:34-6.
  18. Hao P, Tang X, Song H, Wang L, Wang Y, Ying M, Han R, Li N. Screening of FBNl gene mutations in a family with Marfan syndrome. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2010; 46:984-8. [PMID: 21211293]
  19. Katzke S, Booms P, Tiecke F, Palz M, Pletschacher A, Turkmen S, Neumann LM, Pregla R, Leitner C, Schramm C, Lorenz P, Hagemeier C, Fuchs J, Skovby F, Rosenberg T, Robinson PN. TGGE screening of the entire FBN1 coding sequence in 126 individuals with Marfan syndrome and related fibrillinopathies. Hum Mutat. 2002; 20:197-208. [PMID: 12203992]
  20. Nijbroek G, Sood S, McIntosh I, Francomano CA, Bull E, Pereira L, Ramirez F, Pyeritz RE, Dietz HC. Fifteen novel FBN1 mutations causing Marfan syndrome detected by heteroduplex analysis of genomic amplicons. Am J Hum Genet. 1995; 57:8-21. [PMID: 7611299]
  21. Halliday DJ, Hutchinson S, Lonie L, Hurst JA, Firth H, Handford PA, Wordsworth P. Twelve novel FBN1 mutations in Marfan syndrome and Marfan related phenotypes test the feasibility of FBN1 mutation testing in clinical practice. J Med Genet. 2002; 39:589-93. [PMID: 12161601]
  22. Hayward C, Rae AL, Porteous ME, Logie LJ, Brock DJ. Two novel mutations and a neutral polymorphism in EGF-like domains of the fibrillin gene (FBN1): SSCP screening of exons 15–21 in Marfan syndrome patients. Hum Mol Genet. 1994; 3:373-5. [PMID: 8004112]
  23. Oh MR, Kim JS, Beck NS, Yoo HW, Lee HJ, Kohsaka T, Jin DK. Six novel mutations of the fibrillin-1 gene in Korean patients with Marfan syndrome. Pediatr Int. 2000; 42:488-91. [PMID: 11059536]
  24. Loeys B, De Backer J, Van Acker P, Wettinck K, Pals G, Nuytinck L, Coucke P, De Paepe A. Comprehensive molecular screening of the FBN1 gene favors locus homogeneity of classical Marfan syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2004; 24:140-6. [PMID: 15241795]
  25. Biggin A, Holman K, Brett M, Bennetts B, Adès L. Detection of thirty novel FBN1 mutations in patients with Marfan syndrome or a related fibrillinopathy. Hum Mutat. 2004; 23:99 [PMID: 14695540]
  26. Arbustini E, Grasso M, Ansaldi S, Malattia C, Pilotto A, Porcu E, Disabella E, Marziliano N, Pisani A, Lanzarini L, Mannarino S, Larizza D, Mosconi M, Antoniazzi E, Zoia MC, Meloni G, Magrassi L, Brega A, Bedeschi MF, Torrente I, Mari F, Tavazzi L. Identification of sixty-two novel and twelve known FBN1 mutations in eighty-one unrelated probands with Marfan syndrome and other fibrillinopathies. Hum Mutat. 2005; 26:494 [PMID: 16222657]
  27. Rommel K, Karck M, Haverich A, von Kodolitsch Y, Rybczynski M, Muller G, Singh KK, Schmidtke J, Arslan-Kirchner M. Identification of 29 novel and nine recurrent fibrillin-1 (FBN1) mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in 76 patients with Marfan syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2005; 26:529-39. [PMID: 16220557]
  28. Schrijver I, Liu W, Brenn T, Furthmayr H, Francke U. Cysteine substitutions in epidermal growth factor-like domains of fibrillin-1: distinct effects on biochemical and clinical phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 65:1007-20. [PMID: 10486319]
  29. Reinhardt DP, Ono RN, Sakai LY. Calcium stabilizes fibrillin-1 against proteolytic degradation. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272:1231-6. [PMID: 8995426]
  30. Jin C, Yao K, Jiang J, Tang X, Shentu X, Wu R. Novel FBN1 mutations associated with predominant ectopia lentis and marfanoid habitus in Chinese patients. Mol Vis. 2007; 13:1280-4. [PMID: 17679947]
  31. Robinson PN, Booms P. The molecular pathogenesis of the Marfan syndrome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001; 58:1698-707. [PMID: 11706995]
  32. Schrijver I, Liu W, Brenn T, Furthmayr H, Francke U.. Cysteine substitutions in epidermal growth factor-like domains of fibrillin-1: distinct effects on biochemical and clinical phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 65:1007-20. [PMID: 10486319]
  33. Vollbrandt T, Tiedemann K, El-Hallous E, Lin G, Brinckmann J, John H, Bätge B, Notbohm H, Reinhardt DP. Consequences of cysteine mutations in calcium-binding epidermal growth factor modules of fibrillin-1. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279:32924-31. [PMID: 15161917]
  34. Suk JY, Jensen S, McGettrick A, Willis AC, Whiteman P, Redfield C, Handford PA. Structural consequences of cysteine substitutions C1977Y and C1977R in calcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like domain 30 of human fibrillin-1. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279:51258-65. [PMID: 15371449]