SLAT/Def6 plays a critical role in the pathogenic process of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU)

Mice

SLAT/Def6 deficient (“KO”) mice on a C57BL/6 background have been previously described [4]. C57BL/6J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. SLAT/Def6 KO mice and age-and gender-matched control C57BL/6 mice, between the ages of 8 and 12 weeks, were used in this study. The mice were housed in a pathogen-free facility and all experiments were performed under protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Eye Institute, NIH.

Induction and evaluation of EAU

SLAT/Def6 KO mice and their C57BL/6 controls were immunized with bovine IRBP (150 μg), emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA), administered subcutaneously [10]. In addition, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.2 μg pertussis toxin (List Biological Laboratories, Inc., Campbell, CA). The development of ocular inflammation was determined by fundoscopy on day 12 post-immunization and by histological examination on day 14, following euthanization. Severity of disease, on a scale of 0–4, in half point increments, was scored as detailed elsewhere [11,12].

Lymphocyte responses: Proliferation assay

Lymphoid cells from draining lymph nodes (dLN) were collected 14 days post-immunization and pooled within each group. LN cells were cultured as detailed elsewhere [13]. Briefly, draining lymph node cells were collected 14 days post-immunization and cultured in triplicate in flat-bottomed 96-well plates, at 4×10⁵ cells in RPMI-1640 medium, supplemented with HL-1 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD), 2-mercaptoethanol (50 µM), and antibiotics. The stimulants included IRBP at several concentrations and purified protein derivative (PPD), a component of CFA. Following incubation for 72 h, the cultures were pulsed with [3H]-thymidine (0·5 µCi/10 µl/well) for an additional 16 h. Data are presented as mean delta counts per minute (Δcpm)= cpm in stimulated cultures minus cpm in unstimulated cultures.

Dendritic cell (DC) functional assay

DC were isolated from spleens of WT and KO mice by digestion with collagenase D and magnetic separation with autoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) [14]. IRBP responder cells (CD4+) were isolated from spleens and LN of IRBP-immunized mice (day 7) and cultured with the WT or KO DC for antigen presentation, alone, or with stimuli, phytohemagglutinin (PHA), or different concentrations of IRBP. Proliferation of the cultures was measured as detailed in [13].

Lymphocyte responses: Cytokine production

dLN cells were cultured in 24-well plates at 5×10⁶ cells/well in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 2% HL-1 serum replacement (Lonza, Walkesville, MD), antibiotics, and 2-mercaptoethanol. The cultures were stimulated with whole IRBP at 10 μg/ml. Supernatants were collected following incubation for 48 h and their levels of interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-17 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Expression of FoxP3 by lymph node cells

Lymph node cells of the dLN were also tested for their expression of the transcription factor specific for T-regulatory (Treg) cells, FoxP3, using the method described in [15,16]. Briefly, isolated dLN cells were fixed and permeabilized with the Fixation/Permeabilization buffer for 1 h at 4 °C before intracellular staining with allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-Foxp3 antibody, following the procedure recommended by the manufacturer (eBioscience, San Diego, CA).

Serum antibody levels

Mouse sera collected on day 8 and 14 post-immunization were tested for the level of antibody to IRBP by ELISA [17].

qPCR Analysis

qPCR was used to compare the transcript levels of immune-related molecules in inflamed eyes, using the procedure detailed elsewhere [18]. Data obtained were normalized with values of β-actin and calculated to obtain relative expression values.

T-regulatory (Treg) cell functional assay

Tregs (CD4+ CD25+) were sorted by FACS from spleens and LN of WT and KO mice. Naïve responder cells (CD4+, CD25-) were FACS sorted from naïve WT mice and activated with soluble anti-CD3 antibody and APCs (CD3-depleted, irradiated). Tregs from WT or KO mice were cultured alone, with the stimuli and APC, or added in various ratios to cultures of naïve responder cells to test for the ability of the Tregs to block proliferation of the responder cells.

Statistics

Unpaired, two-tailed t test was performed for comparison of severity of disease, proliferative responses, and cytokine analyses. ns=not significant; *p<0.05; **p<0.005.

Mice deficient in SLAT/Def6 are poor responders to EAU induction

To examine the susceptibility of SLAT/Def6 KO mice to induction of EAU, we immunized groups of these mice and their WT C57BL/6 controls with IRBP, as detailed in the Methods section. Development of EAU in the mouse eyes was determined by fundoscopy and histological examination, with good correlation between these two methods of disease detection. Data of histological analyses of repeated experiments are summarized in Figure 1A and show that the deficient mice were significantly inferior to their WT controls in developing EAU.

Figure 1B demonstrates histological sections of representative mouse eyes of the two groups. The WT control eye shows the typical EAU changes that include heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells throughout the optic nerve head, retinal vessels, and limbus, with numerous cells in the vitreous and anterior chamber. Retinal folding is also seen, as well as loss of photoreceptor cells. The eyes of the KO mouse, on the other hand, had very minimal inflammation compared to control eyes, with only a few inflammatory cells entering through the optic nerve head. Clinical changes in inflamed eyes, evaluated by fundoscopy, included swelling and inflammatory infiltrates at the optic nerve disc, cuffing and engorgement of retinal vessels, as well as retinal inflammatory lesions and scars.

SLAT/Def6 KO mice are inferior in their lymphocyte responsiveness

Next, we compared the KO mice and their WT controls for their lymphocyte responsiveness toward IRBP, as well as PPD, a component of the CFA. Lymphoid cells collected from the dLN of mice of the two groups were collected from the mice euthanized on day 14 post-immunization and their responses were measured by the thymidine incorporation assay. Figure 2A is a representative experiment and shows that cells from the mice deficient in SLAT/Def6 responded with remarkably lower levels than their WT controls. Similar data were obtained in 2 other repeated experiments.

In addition, we determined in the lymphocyte culture supernatants the levels of IFN-γ and IL-17, the two signature cytokines for the Th1 and Th17 populations, respectively. As seen in Figure 2B, the levels of both cytokines were lower in cultures of the null mice as compared to cultures of the WT controls.

Dendritic cells from SLAT/Def6 deficient mice resemble their WT controls in their antigen presenting capacity

We next compared the KO mice and their controls for another immunological parameter, i.e., the capacity to present antigen to T-cells. A representative experiment is shown in Figure 3. We used DC preparations from naïve mice of the two mouse lines [14] and added them to cultures of purified CD4 cells sensitized against IRBP, along with their target antigen. The CD4 cells responded to the antigen only when presented by the DC (not shown) and the DC from the KO mice resembled the DC from their WT controls in this capacity.

Deficiency in SLAT/Def6 selectively affects the involvement of Th17 cells in the EAU pathogenic process

To further analyze the mode of action of the deficiency in SLAT/Def6, we compared eyes of KO and WT mice with EAU for the expression levels of IFN-γ and IL-17 transcripts. Data of two repeated experiments are shown in Figure 4. To overcome the variability in transcript levels determined by the qPCR method, we expressed the data as the ratios between the values of IL-17 and IFN-γ transcripts in eyes of WT and KO mice in each of the two experiments. As seen in Figure 4, the involvement of IL-17 in the pathogenic process of EAU was relatively lower in the SLAT/Def6 KO mice as compared with the controls.

The poor cellular immune response in SLAT/Def6 KO mice is not due to increase in Treg activity

Reduced immune response could be due to enhanced activity of Treg cells [18-20]. To examine this possibility in our system, we compared SLAT/Def6 KO mice and their WT controls for the proportions of T-cells that express FoxP3, a transcription factor specific to the majority of Treg cells [14]. The data of a representative experiment, shown in Figure 5A, indicate that the proportions of FoxP3 positive cells were similar among the draining lymph node populations from the immunized SLAT/Def6 KO mice and their controls. Likewise, the KO mice resembled their WT controls in the functional activity of their Treg cells (Figure 5B). Together, these data thus indicate that the possibility of enhanced Treg activity in the KO mice is unlikely.

Deficiency in SLAT/Def6 does not affect the production of specific antibody

Unlike the reduced specific cellular responsiveness in the SLAT/Def6 KO mice, negligible differences were noted between the deficient mice and their WT controls in their production of antibody against the immunizing antigen, IRBP. The data of repeated experiments are summarized in Figure 6 and show similar levels of antibody in sera collected from the two mouse groups on days 8 or 14 post-immunization.