Molecular Vision: Shimizu, Mol Vis 2012; 18:1395-1401. Table 1

Table 1. CNTNAP2 allele frequencies in patients with exfoliation syndrome and in controls in Japanese.

		MAF in this study			MAF in previous study*
dbSNP	Allele	XFS (n=108) XFG (n=85)	Control (n=199)	p-value	XFS (n=770)	Control (n=444)	p-value
rs826802	T	0.435	0.372	0.0884	N/A	N/A	N/A
		0.429		0.0198
rs1404699	T	0.412	0.307	8.57XE-3	0.445	0.397	0.0225
		0.388		0.0581
rs7803992	G	0.394	0.259	5.43XE-4	N/A	N/A	N/A
		0.359		0.016
rs700308	A	0.407	0.432	0.553	0.138	0.103	0.0117
		0.412		0.653
rs4725736	A¹	0.472	0.402	0.093	0.585	0.637	0.0121
		0.441		0.385
rs2107856	G²	0.450	0.432	0.687	0.709	0.776	0.0003
		0.441		0.843
rs2141388	C³	0.444	0.437	0.863	0.709	0.777	0.0002
		0.441		0.930
rs6970064	A⁴	0.181	0.123	0.0524	0.418	0.463	0.0306
		0.182		0.0631

*reported by Krumbiegel et al. [26]. MAF; minor allele frequency, XFS; Exfoliation Syndrome, XFG; Exfoliation Glaucoma. The significance of the association was determined by a contingency table analysis using the χ² test. Upper columns show XFS data, and lower columns show XFG data. 1. There was a difference between the Caucasian and Japanese. Minor allele in previous study was C. 2. Minor Allele in previous study was T. 3. Minor Allele in previous study was T. 4. Minor Allele in previous study was G.