Table 3 of Yousaf, Mol Vis 2011; 17:1153-1163.


Table 3. XPD and XRCC1 combined genotype comparison of controls and patients.

XPD/
XRCC
Male+Female
Controls (n=193)
Male+Female
POAG (n=160)
p
2)
p
(z)
Male+Female
PCAG (n=163)
p
2)
p
(z)
AA/GG 48(25%) 25(15%) 0.01 (20.44) <0.05(2.14) 31(19%) >0.05 (7.18) >0.05(1.32)
AA/GA 30(16%) 19(12%)
>0.05(0.99) 18(11%)
>0.05(1.24)
AA/AA 14(7%) 8(5%)
>0.05(0.87) 9(5%)
>0.05(0.66)
AC/GG 40(21%) 29(18%)
>0.05(0.61) 35(21%)
>0.05(1.72)
AC/GA 26(13%) 45(28%)
<0.001(3.42) 26(16%)
>0.05(0.66)
AC/AA 10(5%) 3(2%)
>0.05(1.64) 14(9%)
>0.05(1.28)
CC/GG 10(5%) 16(10%)
>0.05(1.73) 13(8%)
>0.05(1.07)
CC/GA 9(4%) 9(6%)
>0.05(0.41) 12(7%)
>0.05(1.08)
CC/AA 6(3%) 6(4%)
>0.05(0.33) 5(3%)
>0.05(0.02)
XPD/
XRCC
Male Controls
(n=101)
Male POAG
(n=80)
p
2)
p
(z)
Male PCAG
(n=81)
p
2)
p
(z)
AA/GG 36(35%) 12(15%) <0.001 (27.04) <0.001(3.12) 17(21%) >0.05 (9.60) <0.05(2.16)
AA/GA 11(11%) 12(15%)
>0.05(0.82) 11(14%)
>0.05(0.55)
AA/AA 9(9%) 3(4%)
>0.05(1.39) 5(6%)
>0.05(0.69)
AC/GG 20(20%) 9(11%)
>0.05(1.56) 17(21%)
>0.05(0.20)
AC/GA 14(14%) 26(33%)
<0.001(3.00) 12(15%)
>0.05(0.18)
AC/AA 4(4%) 1(1%)
>0.05(1.10) 8(10%)
>0.05(1.60)
CC/GG 2(2%) 6(7%)
>0.05(1.79) 4(5%)
>0.05(1.11)
CC/GA 3(3%) 5(6%)
>0.05(1.07) 6(7%)
>0.05(1.37)
CC/AA 2(2%) 6(7%)
>0.05(1.79) 1(1%)
>0.05(0.39)
XPD/
XRCC
Female Controls
(n=92)
Female POAG
(n=80)
p
2)
p
(z)
Female PCAG
(n=82)
p
2)
p
(z)
AA/GG 12(13%) 13(16%) >0.05 (13.01) >0.05(0.60) 14(17%) >0.05 (5.57) >0.05(0.74)
AA/GA 19(21%) 7(9%)
<0.05(2.17) 7(8%)
<0.05(2.24)
AA/AA 5(5%) 5(6%)
>0.05(0.23) 4(5%)
>0.05(0.17)
AC/GG 20(22%) 20(25%)
>0.05(0.50) 18(22%)
>0.05(0.03)
AC/GA 12(13%) 19(24%)
>0.05(1.82) 14(17%)
>0.05(0.74)
AC/AA 6(6%) 2(3%)
>0.05(1.25) 6(7%)
>0.05(0.21)
CC/GG 8(9%) 10(12%)
>0.05(0.81) 9(11%)
>0.05(0.51)
CC/GA 6(6%) 4(5%)
>0.05(0.43) 6(7%)
>0.05(0.21)
CC/AA 4(4%) 0(0%)
>0.05(1.89) 4(5%)
>0.05(0.17)