Table 3 of Kim, Mol Vis 2011; 17:1136-1143.

Table 3. Association tests for 17 typed SNPs on 2p14–2p21.

  Controls Glaucoma POAG Co-dominant, p†
SNP (A>B)/position* MAF/AA/AB/BB MAF/AA/AB/BB MAF/AA/AB/BB Glaucoma POAG
rs11685904 (C>T)/48861904 0.060/719/96/1 0.039/188/16/0 0.041/158/14/0 0.289 0.374
rs13024367 (C>G)/48899516 0.075/717/116/5 0.074/180/27/2 0.077/149/25/1 0.793 0.973
rs17542930 (T>C)/49086284 0.187/583/245/40 0.198/138/61/11 0.212/112/55/10 0.893 0.599
rs17483987 (C>T)/49090453 0.158/594/204/29 0.168/143/47/10 0.175/119/41/9 0.661 0.578
rs17831941 (A>G)/49484456 0.027/641/33/2 0.032/192/13/0 0.029/162/10/0 0.738 0.908
rs13025974 (T>C)/50135149 0.242/469/286/52 0.274/112/68/21 0.272/94/58/17 0.124 0.224
rs17039430 (G>A)/50139486 0.244/523/345/52 0.268/121/83/18 0.269/101/67/16 0.304 0.249
rs11681755 (A>G)/50457643 0.118/635/176/9 0.147/149/45/7 0.153/121/41/5 0.044 0.079
rs727248 (T>C)/51580556 0.163/614/240/23 0.152/158/52/7 0.142/134/415 0.386 0.360
rs6545379 (A>G)/54220898 0.074/743/114/7 0.085/173/31/2 0.090/143/27/2 0.715 0.520
rs243016 (T>A)/60588713 0.141/630/199/20 0.138/158/46/6 0.136/134/36/6 0.882 0.580
rs243052 (C>T)/60590257 0.143/649/207/22 0.137/159/46/6 0.136/135/36/6 0.880 0.583
rs12476816 (G>A)/62074097 0.308/412/374/80 0.343/89/111/20 0.341/72/96/14 0.104 0.053
rs7581802 (A>C)/62089938 0.300/438/397/74 0.330/96/107/20 0.324/79/92/14 0.397 0.351
rs888351 (T>A)/65026329 0.103/739/157/15 0.109/180/41/4 0.104/151/33/3 0.844 0.991
rs2098480 (C>T)/65026460 0.097/637/129/11 0.085/141/20/4 0.084/122/18/3 0.333 0.476
rs737366 (G>T)/65034194 0.102/700/151/13 0.111/166/38/4 0.106/140/31/3 0.804 0.966

*Major allele of each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is referred to as A and minor allele as B. Chromosome positions of SNPs are based on the NCBI genome build 37.1. Not listed are rs1020049, rs13396706, rs983511, and rs17049908 with minor allele frequency (MAF) <1%. †The p-values for association with susceptibility to glaucoma or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were calculated according to a co-dominant genetic model using logistic regression with adjustment for age and gender.

Kim, Mol Vis 2011; 17:1136-1143. http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v17/a128

©2011 Molecular Vision http://www.molvis.org/molvis/

ISSN 1090-0535