Molecular Vision: Romero, Mol Vis 2008; 14:829-835. Table 1

Table 1. Clinical features in the affected and unaffected family members.

					Best-corrected vision
Case	Age	Gender	Status	Age of onset	OD	OS	Corneal lesions	Synchronic	Symmetry	Degree*	Degree**
II-1	73	F	Affected	37			Yes#
II-3	69	M	Affected	42	0.13	0.13	Yes	Yes	No	Bad	4
II-4	68	F	Not affected	-	1	1
III-2	55	M	Affected	17			Yes##
III-4	42	M	Not affected	-	1	1
III-5	44	F	Affected	30	0.28	0.13	Yes	No	Yes	Bad	4
III-6	40	F	Affected	28	0.5	0.4	Yes	Yes	Yes	Intermediate	3
III-7	43	M	Not affected	-	1	1
IV-2	16	F	Affected	5
IV-3	15	M	Affected	3	1	1	Yes	Yes	Yes	Very good	1
IV-4	15	F	Affected	4	1	1	Yes	Yes	Yes	Very good	1
IV-5	8	M	Affected	4	0.5	0.67	Yes	Yes	No	Good	2

The phenotypic features of nine patients from the family affected by lattice type I are shown. The age of onset of patients II-1, III-2, and IV-2 were obtained from an interview of patient II-1. Corneal phenotypes were assessed by slit lamp examination. The lesions were considered to be synchronic if the patients perceived the first symptoms at most a month apart in each eye. The degree of severity was classified according to best-corrected vision or corneal commitment. The degree of severity according to best-corrected vision was classified as very good (>0.6), good (<0.6 and >0.4), intermediate (<0.4 and >0.33), and bad (<0.33). The degree of severity according to corneal commitment was classified as follows 1) without lesions, 2) subepithelial, white-grayish opacities, 3) refractile lattice lines, and 4) corneal edema. The following abbreviations were used right eye (OD) and left eye (OS). In the table, the asterisk indicates the degree according to best-corrected vision; the double asterisk indicates the degree according to corneal commitment; the sharp (hash mark) indicates a corneal transplant at 43 years of age; and the double sharp indicates a corneal transplant at 55 years of age.