Table 7 of Ayala-Lugo, Mol Vis 2007; 13:151-163.


Table 7. Aggregate statistical summaries in Asian populations screened for R545Q

Results from computing the upper and lower 95% confidence interval bounds around the odds ratio indicate that none of the Asian divisions are statistically different from an odds ratio of 1. The Woolf test for homogeneity indicates that across studies within each ancestry group the odds ratios are statistically equivalent (i.e., homogeneous, because a p value less than 0.05 would indicate heterogeneity [25]). A two-sided Fisher's exact test on the pooled frequencies was computed for those instances when the Woolf test indicated homogeneity at the 0.05 level. The ancestry groups are collated for China from Chen et al. [14] and Fan et al. [15]; and for Japan from Alward et al. [11], Funayama et al. [16], Fuse et al. [17], Tang et al. [20], and Umeda et al. [21]. The Asia listing includes data pooled from the China and Japan categories. Only Fan et al. [15] report on NTG for China.

                                                                                              Fisher's
                Cases         Controls         Percent              95% CI bounds    Woolf     exact
            -------------   -------------   -------------   Odds    -------------    test       test
Ancestry    R545Q   Total   R545Q   Total   OAG   Control   ratio   Lower   Upper   p value   p value
---------   -----   -----   -----   -----   ---   -------   -----   -----   -----   -------   --------
China       32      518     24      412     6.2   5.8       0.98    0.57    1.70    0.648     0.89
Japan       62      1208    28      661     5.1   4.2       1.20    0.76    1.90    0.838     0.43

Asia        94      1726    52      1073    5.4   4.8       1.12    0.78    1.58    0.925     0.541

China-NTG   7       106     5       150     6.6   3.3       2.04    0.54    8.41    -         0.244
Japan-NTG   40      705     28      661     5.7   4.2       1.40    0.84    2.33    0.848     0.263

Ayala-Lugo, Mol Vis 2007; 13:151-163 <http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v13/a18/>
©2007 Molecular Vision <http://www.molvis.org/molvis/>
ISSN 1090-0535