Table 2 of
Ozgul, Mol Vis 2005;
11:916-921.Table 2 of
Ozgul, Mol Vis 2005;
11:916-921.
Table 2. Comparison of the phenotype variables between POAG patients with and without the MYOC.mt1 variant
Comparison of the phenotype variables between POAG patients with and without the MYOC.mt1 variant. The influence of the MYOC.mt1 polymorphism on different clinical parameters did not differ between MYOC.mt1 carriers and non-carriers.
Carriers Non-carriers
MYOC.mt1 (24 patients) (64 patients) p value
------------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------
Mean age
at diagnosis (years) 51.58 ± 9.47 53.94 ± 9.73 0.313
at inclusion (years) 61.96 ± 10.88 62.92 ± 10.17 0.699
Mean IOP
at diagnosis (mm Hg) 27.29 ± 3.9 26.14 ± 3.4 0.182
at diagnosis in females 27 ± 3.18 25.84 ± 3.13 0.213
at diagnosis in males 28 ± 5.5 26.62 ± 3.82 0.455
Mean C/D ratio (median) 0.58 ± 0.21 (0.60) 0.54 ± 0.21 (0.50) 0.524
Mean mean-deviation (median) -7.08 ± 6.8 (-4.73) -8.98 ± 7.15 (-5.4) 0.307
Mean pattern standard deviation 4.90 ± 4.16 (2.62) 5.16 ± 4.03 (2.45) 0.793
(median)
Mean number of medications 1.9 ± 0.8 1.7 ± 0.8 0.375
Family history (number and 5 (20.8%) 14 (22.2%) 0.889
percentage)
Trabeculectomy (number and 2 (8.3%) 8 (12.5%) 0.721
percentage)
|